Leading disability advocate felt ‘demeaned and violated’ by Parliamentary security

Genevieve Jacobs 25 September 2019 6
Yen Purkiss and Christina Ryan

Disability advocate Christina Ryan (r) with fellow activist Yen Purkiss at the launch of this year’s CMAG activism exhibition. Photo: Genevieve Jacobs.

One of Australia’s leading disability advocates has called out security at Parliament House for “demeaning” treatment that she found threatening and intimidating.

Christina Ryan has worked at the UN on a number of occasions, flies regularly and is well prepared for the security issues around her large motorised wheelchair.

“I take everything out of my bag that I don’t absolutely need. I dress in a way that makes it easier for me to deal with their requests. I have operated like this for years because as an advocate for my sector, I am often at Parliament,” she told Region Media.

“Perhaps five visits to Parliament in the last decade have been trouble-free, the rest of my experiences have been really depersonalising and unpleasant. But last week was probably the worst experience I have had anywhere.”

Ryan, who founded the Disability Leadership Institute, was at Parliament last week for a meeting with the Australian Federation of Disability Organisations.

“I’d detached the bag I was carrying and put it through the scanner when one of the security guards approached me before I had even gone through the metal detector and started talking at the back of my head.

“I asked him to talk to my face, but next thing I know he is trying to remove the big bag that is permanently attached to my wheelchair and designed with scanners and security in mind.”

She knew she would set off the metal detector and attempted to move to one side so she could be manually scanned, but a barricade blocked her way and her bags and belongings were held in the scanner.

Ryan says she was suddenly surrounded by three security staff, one facing her and two behind her. Asked to remove her outer layers of clothing, she says her chair was jostled by the staff, who spoke over her and at her rather than to her.

By this stage, the screening process had taken more than 10 minutes and Ryan says she was beginning to dissociate to cope with the pressure.

“Then everything stopped so I asked if we were done and could I go. But then the woman security guard said to me ‘I just need to check your belly'”.

Ryan says the request left her gobsmacked, feeling demeaned and “utterly appalled by what was happening”.

Angry and feeling violated, she picked up her outer layers of clothing, held them up to her chin “and flashed my underwear at her”.

It was a statement of anger and defiance, Ryan says, amidst an experience that left her feeling dehumanised.

“I wondered if they ask anyone else if they can feel their belly?”

The experience took days to process before she decided to go public on social media and speak to a handful of trusted media contacts. Ryan says it’s been a cathartic experience and one she felt was necessary. There’s been a barrage of social media and other attention since.

“It’s important for other disabled people to know things like this happen, including to high profile people in the community like me. Going through this kind of treatment can often be very isolating.

“It’s been supportive to have such a strong response, but this is about the bigger understanding that it’s not OK, whoever it happens to. It’s not OK to be treated as an object of suspicion just because you are different.

“I know that you can’t compromise security, but this is about doing it respectfully and treating people as individuals. I’ve been treated more respectfully during an airport full-body search at JFK Airport than I was at Parliament House.”

Ryan says Parliamentary Services have been in touch and the incident is being investigated. She believes the issue is a cultural one among staff but says the level of aggravation is bad enough to make her question whether she can handle going into the building.

“Fundamentally, I am pretty physically vulnerable. There’s not a lot I can do to deal with people being intimidating. I do assert myself but I’ve learned that I don’t argue – it will make it worse. Switching off and enduring it is the only option you have.

“The critical thing is that Parliament is the people’s building. Twenty per cent of us are disabled. We look different, some of us come with bits of equipment and they are just going to have to learn to deal with us. They can’t make us so unwelcome that we cannot do our work,” Ryan says.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
6 Responses to Leading disability advocate felt ‘demeaned and violated’ by Parliamentary security
lynehamovaluser lynehamovaluser 8:17 pm 30 Dec 19

In 2000, they were unable to process me through their usual security access, my scooter was too big. I was isolated from my fellows and when I asked if I could be accompanied was told ‘no’; taken to a separate entrance, I had to wait for someone with keys. I was told that I would not be able to come and go outside with other associates for ‘smoke breaks’, that I would have to remain inside for the duration of the event. By the time they had ‘finished’ with me I was almost in tears of frustration and anger. After finding some organiser types who were ‘able bodied’ and explaining what had occurred, they tried to negotiate; I was given ‘permission’ to ‘smoke’ ALONE in a courtyard that I would need to request access to each time. For those who remember networking at smoke breaks you will understand my extra frustration.
Suffice to say I left early, I have not been back and I can only hope things have improved. Demeaned and violated! I call it discrimination when you are treated unfairly solely due to the effects of a disability.

Margaret Freemantle Margaret Freemantle 10:45 pm 25 Sep 19

There are also very good people that belong to the security staff at parliament house. However, this situation is dreadful.

Phyl Oliver Phyl Oliver 4:05 pm 25 Sep 19

I visited Parliament House back in 2000. As I was going through the check point a young lad of about 17 went through at the same time. The alarm went off - as I had recently had back surgery and had titanium down my spine I knew it was my fault. The officer on duty grabbed the young lad by his collar and pulled him back and asked him what he had. I interrupted and explained that it was my fault the alarm went off (and why) I was told to "move on lady and don't try to tell me my job" I felt very deeply for this young lad - he was the innocent one.

Karen Nicholson Karen Nicholson 1:52 pm 25 Sep 19

It is abuse. It needs to be treated as abuse.

Matt Frawley Matt Frawley 1:30 pm 25 Sep 19

They are shocking there. Totally unprepared for anyone with special needs.

Kriso Hadskini Kriso Hadskini 10:42 am 25 Sep 19

Absolutely not good enough! Probably agency staff as everything these days is outsourced. Undertrained and uncaring.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site