Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Excellence in Public Sector consulting

Liberals not convinced by Chiefly testimony. Is anyone else?

By johnboy - 6 July 2012 25

The Liberals’ Jeremy Hanson is hot and bothered following Chief Minister Gallagher’s estimates interrogation yesterday in the wake of Auditor-General’s findings that health statistics at Canberra hospital were manipulated on an industrial scale (11,700 records altered) by (probably) multiple people of which only one (Kate Jackson) has been identified:

“Katy Gallagher has misled the community about the nature of her conflict of interest in this scandal,” Mr Hanson said today.

“Her relative’s direct working relationship with the individual at the centre of the scandal should have been fully disclosed from the outset. Instead, she has continued to be tricky with her words and keep the community in the dark.

“She’s continually changed her story, and up until today, hasn’t explained the full scope of her conflict of interest.

“Katy Gallagher was silent on any potential conflict until the Opposition started asking direct questions in April, and even then, she failed to disclose the full extent of the conflict of interest.

“It was revealed under questioning today, that not only does her relative have a personal relationship with the Manager who falsified emergency department data, they also work under them in an area associated with the Emergency Department.

“Katy Gallagher simply cannot be trusted to tell the full story on any health issue.

“These continual changes to Katy Gallagher’s story are precisely why we need a Royal Commission into this scandal,” Mr Hanson concluded.

The ABC reports that the Chief Minister’s solution to the problem is a “Director of Data Integrity” within the Health Directorate.

Will this Director be reporting to the as yet unidentified data rorters?

An internal position hardly seems like a real solution to an integrity issue. It looks a lot more like a position tasked with making sure they don’t get caught in the future.

She’s also commissioning old hand Professor Mick Reid to review governance in the Directorate. Professor Reid reviewed ACT Health in 2002.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
25 Responses to
Liberals not convinced by Chiefly testimony. Is anyone else?
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
PantsMan 6:16 pm 11 Jul 12

PantsMan said :

And now the FOI dumps roll in!

In the two minutes I’ve looked at the “Triage Reform” FOI release today ( I’ve noticed the following:

“If you use the override catorgory, do you triage up or triage down:

Up: 2 responses

Down: 17 responses”

Source: page 5 of this:

Does anyone know what this means:

2. EDIS daily data review
In place since 2004. Time corrected daily for a number of set & approved criteria.
Eg time of commencement of medially approved and supervised protocol,
Chest pain pathway – ECG review, earliest Dr seen time in notes or on EDIS, etc.
Continue to ensure capture of earliest legitimate time seen.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site