7 February 2025

Zoning changes on the way to bring 'missing middle' to existing suburbs, says Steel

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
69
Sold sign in front of townhouse strip.

More of these will be coming to a suburb near you. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Work to unlock the development of new housing in existing suburbs will accelerate this year with zoning changes planned across Canberra so more low-rise, medium-density homes can be built, Planning Minister Chris Steel told the Legislative Assembly this week.

Mr Steel said these and other reforms would support Labor’s plan to build 30,000 new homes in the ACT by the end of the decade.

He said work was already underway on zoning changes that would go beyond dual occupancies where just a 120 square metre unit-titled second dwelling on a block larger than 800 sqm was permitted.

“It is intended that the new reforms will allow a diverse range of housing to be built, not just dual occupancies, but a range of townhouses/duplexes, row houses and walk-up apartments in existing residential areas, including RZ1 zones,” he said.

READ ALSO Pricing your home for a fast, smooth and successful sale

The government was also developing a new “missing middle” design guide with a technical advisory group, including architects, to support the new range of medium-density homes that will spring up as a result.

Mr Steel said a Major Plan Amendment was also in the works and he expected these reforms to be made law by the end of the year.

He told the Assembly that other significant zoning reforms would be developed to allow larger-scale medium-density housing in areas close to services, shops and transport.

“Like European cities, this is intended to support human-scale housing that will promote access to public transport, renewal of shopping centres and the public spaces around them,” he said.

This includes so-called shop-top apartments, above retail and commercial tenancies, and units developed on surface car parks or next to local shops.

This next stage of planning reform will be directed to building more housing in the City and Northern Gateway.

Mr Steel said work will also start on a new Southern Gateway Planning and Design Framework to support the future light rail extension to Woden.

“This is about bringing land-use planning and transport planning together to ensure that existing and new residents are well connected with transport, jobs and services,” he said.

The government’s land release program would continue, but Mr Steel said housing would also be increasingly built on leased land.

READ ALSO Labor moves to scrap ACAT third-party appeals to put public housing and health projects on the fast track

The ACT Property Council said its research showed these reforms could unlock 60,000 new homes – helping to meet demand, make better use of existing infrastructure, and provide more housing choice for Canberrans at every stage of life.

It said Mr Steel’s commitment to allowing a greater diversity of housing in existing suburbs was a key recommendation of the Property Council’s 2024 report, 60,000 Homes.

Executive Director Ashlee Berry said the planning system wasn’t keeping up with Canberra’s growing population.

“By unlocking more housing with these reforms, more people will have the opportunity to live where they want without being pushed to the fringes,“ she said.

Join the conversation

69
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

More spin to build slums of the future. We want a green city with trees and real parks not concrete heat sinks. Stop fuinjng our beautiful city.

Anything with a strata is not ok – lifetime of income for developers – time for green title here (townhouses are great without shared walls and not simply glorified apartments), time for negative gearing to go for people who have more than one property

devils_advocate10:39 am 09 Feb 25

How does a strata provide income for developers?

HiddenDragon8:40 pm 08 Feb 25

So much for Barr’s soothing pre-election assurances about “gentle urbanism”.

In the same week that the budget con-job has been revealed, this is another betrayal of people who cast their votes for Labor – just over three months ago – on the basis of understandings which have been dumped now that the election is conveniently in the rear vision mirror.

This is a dressed up revenue grab and an attempt to distract from the government’s handiwork in making housing in this glorified country town the second most expensive in the nation by pretending that some sort of long overdue liberation is happening.

The “unlocking” which is referred to in the propaganda for this initiative is a slimy spin on leaving tens of thousands of Canberra households open to having their peace, privacy, amenity and solar access trashed and stolen without a cent of compensation, and with every likelihood of even more extortionate rates on the back of even more inflated land valuations.

This won’t be the last predation of this sort because it won’t solve the supply and affordability problems it pretends to address and won’t save a broken ACT budget. The truth is that the ACT government’s finances now rest heavily on a population/real estate Ponzi scheme which is in its latter stages – and those schemes never end happily.

I, for one, voted Labor ahead of Liberal because I knew they were more likely to build missing middle housing. There’s a lot of misconceptions in HiddenDragon’s comment. The location of these proposed townhouses, is means they are not going to trash anyone’s peace, privace, amenity or solar access. If there is a ponzi scheme, it is the ever expanding sprawl of single family dwellings that was the normal development pattern in Canberra. Such a development pattern results means that a lot of infrastructure needs to be built (roads, pipes, drains, wires, etc) for a relatively small number of dwellings. 20-30 years down the track, this starts to get expensive to maintain. Where does the money come from? Typically from more land sales. It’s only the gradual densification that’s being proposed that can break this sort of ponzi scheme.

Where do they find the architects who are so adept at designing such ugly, boxy, bland, aestheticly challenged human kennels? Did they get their training in the North Korea School of Architecture? Could they not find a job anywhere else? Once these ‘structures’ are built, as cheaply as possible, but with inflated sales prices, they leak, they crack and are afflicted with quality control problems because Canberra building approvals, inspections, architects and corporate builders are a farce. Government should be stipulating some design standard across Canberra. There should be more use of bluestone, which is a local stone and pleasing to the eye when incorporated into housing facades. Canberra once had a Canberra style, now long gone under Barr’s program of uglification.

justsomeaussie5:12 pm 08 Feb 25

All this sounds great but it means more parking spaces that arent being built. You cant grow housing in the suburbs without increasing parking in the suburbs

Rosemary Landy2:10 pm 08 Feb 25

Totally agree Jilly, heartbreaking to see the lack of trees in the new suburbs and old trees being chopped down.

The problem with population increases, of any kind, is that amenities often don’t get delivered for another couple of decades. If at all. Both major parties seem intent on growing the ACT population incessantly, although to a large extent ACT governments have no say in the matter. Neither have a plan to deal with it, beyond the far too delayed tram.

If population increase is necessary medium density is far better, and cheaper to deliver services to, than urban sprawl. But the areas need to have infrastructure being built now if the populations are going to be substantially increased in the next couple of years.

Victor Bilow2:04 pm 08 Feb 25

We have come a long way in town planning, as these look exactly like the 1950s and 1960s Northbourne avenue flats that have been demolished. This Government has no idea now and has never had any idea in the past about a good town plan.

As the ISCCC has pointed out many times, there is no “missing middle” in the Inner South, with 60% of dwellings being units or apartments (last census). More under construction already!

Alan Foulkes1:25 pm 08 Feb 25

There should be no mass grade level parking in Canberra.

devils_advocate12:39 pm 08 Feb 25

Unless that address the punitive lease variation charges, stamp duties, excess delays with planning and adversarial bureaucracy, all of this will be for nought

Such a great opportunity to do what has been done in parts of Sydney where proximity to existing rapid bus or light rail stops results in up-zoning. The College St, Haydon Drive, Barry Drive corridor has so many opportunities – and combined with bus lanes would make for very convenient living. Same goes for Northbourne Ave. Can the value capture in increased rates be calculated and directed into local infrastructure like light rail to Belconnen?

They want to infill existing suburbs but there is ZERO desire to increase infrastructure to support that growth. This is not a policy but wishful thinking from a broke government.

Having super dense population is not the answer.

Incidental Tourist9:16 am 08 Feb 25

The problem is not deficit of dwellings or even zoning. The problem is the deficit of investors. Investors sell off and leave Canberra for NSW, QLD and WA. If this government wants 30,000 extra homes then they have to persuade many more than 30,000 people to buy into ACT on top and above many who are selling off. And what does this gov offer? Highest rates and land tax? A billion dollar budget deficit ensuring rapid property tax growth? Or maybe most restrictive tenancy legislation with rent caps heavily biased to tenants? Or perhaps sluggish capital growth?

Maybe we don’t need those investors? Maybe all those new homes can be bought by people who want to live there instead? Maybe the role of government is ensuring that people have good places to live, not underwriting easy returns for lazy investors.

Just a thought…

From what I have seen, Incidental Tourist always pops up with this tripe. His “arguments” have more holes than a sieve.

Incidental Tourist9:22 pm 08 Feb 25

You’ve got a point. If you don’t need investors, why do you need tenants in your utopia? If you need house go get a job which pays well. Then go get mortgage and buy a house. Why do you need housing problem?

Fundamentally, small investors are not suppliers of houses. They mostly purchase to rent, not build. For all your repetitious fear-mongering, there continues to be a healthy supply of investors and rentals in Canberra and that will continue.

Incidental Tourist9:26 pm 09 Feb 25

Saying that “mum and dad” investors who buy established houses and provide 80% of rentals are bad to housing market is as foolish as saying that since the same “mums and dads” invest in super fund and their super buys “blue chip” companies this is equally harmful to Australian businesses and overall economy.

Gregg Heldon8:28 am 08 Feb 25

So many issues with this article.
Human scale housing? What the he’ll is that? Since every human is different as are their housing circumstances and needs, is a superfluous bit of word saladry.
If the Northern gateway is Northbourne Ave, surely the Southern gateway is the Monaro Highway and Jerrabomberra Ave. Even though they’re implying Adelaide Ave.
I do think that apartments above local shops is an idea to be explored. It won’t work for every shopping centre, but it should work for some. Capped to two stories above the shops, maybe.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.