28 February 2025

New e-scooter company poised to roll into Canberra, promises fix to e-scooters' 'five challenges'

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
31
woman with scooter

Ario e-scooters being trialled in Canberra earlier this year. Photo: Ario.

A young new e-scooter company is making a pitch to operate in Canberra, and promises to come with none of the problems of current models.

Ario was established about 12 months ago, offering fleets of three-wheeled scooters in cities across Australia and New Zealand, and while it isn’t quite in serious talks with the ACT Government just yet, they’re mounting a strong case.

“We know that e-scooters are good for Canberra, and they do serve a purpose, and we’re going to submit a tender response when the government decides it’s going to run a tender,” Ario Australia executive Trent Williams told Region, after a media preview event at Regatta Point.

READ ALSO Canberra Centre announces new 1500 sqm ‘flagship store’ to replace Zara

The ACT Government has been looking for a replacement for e-scooter operator Beam Mobility since late last year, after booting hundreds of the company’s purple scooters from the city when it was revealed the company had exceeded the number of scooters it was allowed to deploy.

“Beam was authorised to operate 950 e-scooters across Canberra, including specific numbers (caps) for different regions within our city,” Transport Canberra and City Services deputy director-general Ben McHugh said at the time.

“We believe Beam has failed to meet the expectations of the Canberra community under their permit to operate and therefore we will not be renewing their permit to operate.”

Beam was banned from Brisbane, Townsville, Auckland and Wellington for the same reason.

Beam e-scooters

A rare photo of Beam e-scooters lined up neatly in a row in Ainslie Place, Civic. Photo: Photox – Canberra Photography Services.

This left only the orange Neuron scooters here, and these – like any traditional e-scooter we’ve seen up to this point – face “five challenges”, according to Mr Williams.

“People don’t wear their helmets, they don’t park them properly – they leave them as an obstruction or hazard on footpaths, tandem riding – which is illegal – is prevalent, and they ride them on footpaths that are supposed to be at a set speed, and they’re not,” he said.

The stand-out feature on Ario’s scooters are the three wheels – two at the front and one at the back – which is said to give a “much more stable and safe platform for people to ride on” and “make it more accessible for all types of riders”.

The wheels are also equipped with suspension, front and back, for a “much smoother ride”.

woman with scooter

Ario promises AI overcomes many of the problems associated with e-scooters. Photo: Ario.

But the “real gamechanger” is the heavy use of AI.

“We’ll start with the four cameras – it’s got a camera on the front, two on the side and one at the rear – and what they do is enable us to have a 360-perspective around the e-scooter,” Mr Williams explained.

At the end of each journey, the AI – with the help of human “rangers” based at Ario’s Canberra HQ – will access the cameras to work out if it’s been parked correctly, and safely out of harm’s way.

“If it’s not, we can then actually take remote control of the e-scooter, and if it passes all our safety protocols – such as, there aren’t too many people around or it doesn’t need to cross traffic lights – we can move it.”

READ ALSO Protester arrested at Ainslie phone tower site as group warns of precedent for rest of Canberra

To prevent passers-by from thinking they’ve perhaps wandered onto a set from The Conjuring, these moves will be accompanied by an audible announcement from the scooter about how it’s being remotely controlled.

The cameras also scan the way ahead to determine if it’s a footpath, bike path, or road, and adjust the speed accordingly, which Mr Williams says is “extraordinarily” more accurate than the inbuilt-GPS system used by many e-scooters.

Pedestrians won’t have to worry about two wheels hitting them in the back of the ankles, instead of just one, either. Ario has thought of this too.

“If somebody were to walk in front of the e-scooter, the camera would detect that person, and the AI would determine whether that person is a potential hazard. If it is, the scooter would automatically slow down.”

Each scooter wears four cameras to scan the way ahead (and to make sure there’s only one rider on board). Photo: Ario.

To run the fleet, there would be two groups of rangers – one based in the Ario warehouse to monitor all the cameras and AI tech, and the other, out around Canberra, replacing the battery packs and taking the empty ones back to the warehouse for charging.

As for how many Ario scooters might be deployed across Canberra, and where, Mr Williams said that’s a decision for the government.

“For the first day, if Canberra says you put 750 scooters down, we’ll probably put about a third of that out to begin with, just to make sure that everything is aligned and that we’re not causing undue disruption to the community and so on,” he said.

“I think in Canberra there seems to be a real positive vibe about e-scooters, and … we can certainly provide a solution to Canberra that mitigates the key challenges most people complain about.”

Join the conversation

31
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I’m surprised anyone would risk riding a scooter or bicycle in Canberra these days with the cost of living crisis hitting some so hard that they can’t even afford a leash for their dog – the risk of being taken down by an unrestrained, out-of-control dog is too great.

billyates19557:38 am 04 Mar 25

I have no opinion, one way or t’other about scooters, but I’m bemused to see the young guy who gets around my local area on a scooter at fantastic (Fast) speeds, his scooter furnished with a drinks crate upon which he sits, just waiting for that big accident in which he has life threatening injuries and unfortunately ends up hurting some innocent pedestrian in the process. It really looks like a circus act and I don’t understand the mentality of his parents who allow it to happen. They obviously don’t care much for him.

Sadly with the rush to embrace ‘exciting’ new technology, whole cohorts of pedestrians are being ignored and seriously disadvantaged. The elderly are often infirm in multiple ways, and a common cause of loss of independence or death is the consequence of a fall. Cyclists and scooterists ‘sneaking’ up from behind to literally brush or close pass (let alone actually bumping into) are now a very big risk to these pedestrians, whose ‘startle’ reactions can easily lead to unstable movement and a fall.
It might be noted that other jurisdictions are taking these risks and respecting the elderly far more seriously than here.

A complete load of nonsense. The most common cause of pedestrian accidents for the elderly is crossing the road due to decrease visual, mental, hearing acuity and reaction time etc.

If people were generally concerned about senior pedestrians they’d be calling for more and better public transport and better crossings at points where there are likely to be seniors.

But no they don’t because the issue of senior safety isn’t really the motivation here, it’s about people who don’t like technology and/or the young people who use it shutting down both.

It’s not just the elderly. I got abused by a cyclist after he claimed I caused him to crash. I was on a pedestrian path (I know cyclists are allowed to use them, within reason) and if a cyclist approaches from behind and lets me know they are coming (bell, calling out something like “coming through” or “on your right”) I will step off the path. I also tried to keep to the left to ease anyone else’s right to use the path. On the crash day, he came up on me from behind with speed and with no warning until he was almost on top of me. He then screamed “hey lady”, as if there was something wrong. Of course it startled me and as I turned to find what was the urgency, he swerved and ended up in the gravel. He became abusive, claimed he was going to sue me for damage to his bike and only backed off when I told him I was going to report his behaviour to the police.

Seano whilst the media focus only on trams, cars, bikes and scooters, I’ve been calling for more and better public transport ever since this government reduced it years ago, along with more pedestrian crossings, but this government is not interested in supporting the carless, the elderly or disabled, just in talking about inclusivity that is quite exclusive to their particular interests.

Try walking across Canberra Avenue anywhere between Fyshwick and Manuka. No pedestrian crossing to or from Kingston, so people (including schoolkids) play chicken with the traffic at peak times, or when idiots speed along at ridiculous rates as if no-one would ever cross the road.

So many near misses, but the ACT government refuses to act even outside St Clares & St Edmunds, as they don’t want to slow the flow of traffic they say repeatedly. I would have thought that slowing the traffic so people can cross was a logical thing to do. They also refuse to repair the footpaths outside of St Clares, with no safe walking or pram pushing let alone disability scooter use.

Exactly Psycho. Instead of talking about these issues it’s the typical reactionary “ban the scooters”.

People on this page paying lip service to issues like the safety and access of pedestrians because they don’t like scooters not because they give a rats about seniors or mums with prams is why things don’t get fixed.

I also suggest the reason, in part, is because the footpaths ??? are far too narrow for such multi-role use, and they are inevitably broken, cracked or not level which means water covering the things. We can and must do better with the basic infrastructure in this city.

@P “フィル” C
In this age of potentially intrusive technology, why single out this device?

Do you know what information is being “captured” by your car’s computer system, your mobile phone or your laptop with onboard camera – which I’m sure you are aware, all have onboard cameras?

Because the issue for most of these commenters isn’t the meta data or senior safety, it’s either a dislike of scooters which is a reasonable position but not easy to argue on the merits or the usual bandwagon jumpers because we live in an age where groupthink is king.

eScooters litter Canberra but my biggest gripe is that they do not have bells. As a pedestrian and a bike rider I have been frightened a number of times by a silent scooter going past me at great speed. We don’t need any more scooters.

“People don’t wear their helmets, they don’t park them properly – they leave them as an obstruction or hazard on footpaths, tandem riding – which is illegal – is prevalent, and they ride them on footpaths that are supposed to be at a set speed, and they’re not,”
All true. We don’t want any more of these things littering the city, deliberately abandoned, dumped or knocked over. They are a waste of resources, a safety hazard, an environmental hazard and a plaything for hoons, too lazy to walk and too stupid to care about other people.

Who is this “we”?

I can tell you I am sick of Luddites dictating what “we” do or don’t want. Especially when the basis of these arguments are way overblown. The vast majority of scooter use is safe and sensible, as it it with bicycles and mobility scooters although I’m sure I could find people who would argue for banning both of those things.

I have no problem with common sense rules and checks and balances. But this attitude of “I don’t like it therefore it should be banned” is tedious.

Today was Clean Up Australia day. I picked 4 Neuron scooter helmets out of the lake. There were others I couldn’t reach, floating in undergrowth. Just in one small part of the lake. When the actions of thoughtless irresponsibe scooter riders and profit making corporations interfere with the rights, enjoyment and safety of the majority then time to act. Common sence, unless one is a latent right wing Trumpist.

Besides the fact that I rarely believe convenient and self-serving anecdotes like that how many car parts, or bike parts or dumped household items did you find?

Are we banning cars or bikes or microwaves next?

Or was our nature pristine of all other evidence of society, and we should only ban things you don’t personally like?

PS. I don’t know how you get “Trumpist” out of being against people banning things they don’t personally like particularly on the basis of tenuous or over blown issues. I would have thought quite the opposite.

Definitely a ‘Trumpist’, when contemptuous of community safety concerns, careless of the environment, arrogantly dismissive of alternate views and experiences, in possession of a fixed mindset, abrasive and habitually rude. If you don’t believe scooter helmets were pulled out of the lake on Clean Up Australia Day then participate in the event. Unless you fear encountering facts, as in slime covered floating helmets, that conflict with your opinions.

Oh please, you don’t care about safety. What a load of absolute nonsense. The biggest risk for pedestrians particularly seniors is not scooters it’s crossing the road.

If you actually cared instead of paying lip service to the issue because it’s suits your anti-scooter, anti-youth agenda you’d be calling for more and better public transport, better pedestrian access and better crossing particularly at points that seniors are likely to need to cross roads.

As for your repeated “Trumpist” jibe, I’m not the one who wants to shutdown things I don’t personally like on basis of a flimsy pretext….the only person who sounds Trumpist here is you mate.

PS. I didn’t reject the suggest that the suggestion that helmets have been found in the lake, I rejected a self-serving anecdote in support of a weak argument. There’s a difference.

I also I pointed out other junk related to cars, bikes and households would also have been found in the lake and bushland but you’re not calling for bans on cars, bikes or household luxuries.

P “フィル” C1:45 am 02 Mar 25

Are we just going to ignore the serious privacy concerns of having 400 AI-powered scooters collecting data on people, faces, and who knows what other metadata? This isn’t just a marketing tool, it’s potential surveillance. Everyone worries about TikTok’s security risks, but this could be even more intrusive, mapping key points of interest and tracking the people around them.

I’m not even paranoid conspiracy theorist person but as someone that has worked in defence there is no way of want any of these things near any key points of interest in Canberra

If you’re worried about 400 scooters collecting meta data you haven’t been paying attention.

Capital Retro7:50 pm 02 Mar 25

They will only get micro data from you, Seano.

Why is that Capital? Explain the “joke”.

Some heroes don’t wear capes.

Love the solutions proposed above- but not sure how helmet wearing will be managed? It doesn’t mention that.

I guess they could point a camera at the rider’s head and unless a helmet is detected the scooter won’t work.

Agreed. Sounds a bit like marketing when they put forward the problems with the current offers available but don’t address them when discussing their own offer.

Capital Retro7:51 pm 02 Mar 25

The Tasmanian ones will have 2 helmets per scooter.

Natural selection will eventually take care of that one – such people obviously have nothing worth protecting.

If they have the ability to remotely check that a scooter has been incorrectly parked, why stop at moving it to a safer spot? They would also know the credit card details of the last user. If they start slugging those irresponsible users with a massive fine, I imagine it will take about two seconds for the behaviour to suddenly improve.

Exactly! Make it a condition of use that any misuse results in a fine or loss of a bond of some sort. Shouldn’t be hard.

I doubt there is a more tired clique than the old codger banging on in a rambling rant about irresponsible teens and demanding bans for things they don’t personally like ….unsurprisingly these clowns are often pro “freedom”, but you know just not for anyone else.

Anyway for reasonable people who don’t blame teens for everything and who like technology these are great innovations in the scooter space. Particularly the addition of suspension which will hopefully mean fewer accidents.

My one problem as larger person with rental bikes and scooters is that the helmets never fit. “One size fits most” is not remotely true.

These electric pedestrian skittlers are in Albury. Young irresponsible teens hire them and then ride them at ridiculous speeds down the footpaths and even along the main roads in and out of traffic in Albury. They also get left absolutely everywhere. Then you get to the visual eyesore that they are. Moves are already afoot in Albury to get them banned. Couldn’t be more approving of that move.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.