27 June 2024

No-frills Budget as steady-as-she-goes Barr steers a narrow course to election

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
12

Chief Minister and Treasurer Andrew Barr: “We do have to make trade-offs and choices.” Photo: Ian Bushnell.

“Calm and measured” – that’s how Andrew Barr described his 13th Budget. Some might say boring, plenty seemed to think it offered meagre pickings.

A traditional election Budget it wasn’t. Apart from some stamp duty cuts, some temporary, to help owner-occupiers buy a home in tandem with increased land release, there was not much that screamed ‘I want your vote!’

Mr Barr made a virtue of this, saying the Budget, while “slightly stimulatory”, charts a sensible and sustainable path back to balance.

That’s if the economy and inflation play ball, which they didn’t this Budget. If they don’t come good next year, that path back to balance could be a long one.

READ MORE Barr’s balancing act as slowdown keeps Budget in red

Not that Mr Barr believes delivering a surplus is his job as Treasurer: “I don’t need to say that every Budget needs to be in surplus regardless of the economic circumstances and regardless of the pain that our community is experiencing. A surplus for surplus’s sake is not good economics.”

Mr Barr managed a very targeted cost-of-living package to acknowledge the tough times. The infrastructure program was kept intact, but milestones were revised, and there were savings across government and new taxes and increases in existing charges to lift revenue without too much pain.

However, in an environment of falling revenue, rising debt, and higher interest rates, Mr Barr had very little room to manoeuvre unless he wanted another credit rating downgrade before the election.

He acknowledged that the government had been in touch with ratings agency Standard and Poor’s and looked at other jurisdictions to ensure it hit the right targets to avoid any downgrade.

Mr Barr said that pre-Budget, there would not be any big spending surprises like that in Queensland.

But he can work from the relative comfort of a strong electoral position for Labor. His pitch to voters is to stick with a reliable hand on the helm and a government that delivers what the community wants.

Mr Barr’s focus on health, housing and cost of living responds to the Budget consultation.

Some may be disappointed, but Mr Barr knows he can’t please everybody.

“I understand that not every stakeholder, not every interest group, not every individual will get everything that they could possibly want out of one individual Budget,” he said.

“No one Budget can solve all the problems of the world. We do have to make trade-offs and choices.”

Expectations are being deliberately played down ahead of the election, especially when it comes to infrastructure. That is at full capacity.

READ MORE Budget Reaction: Can we have some more, please?

What Mr Barr can tick off, though, is the new Critical Services Building at Canberra Hospital and point to the new Woden CIT on the way to opening in 2025.

The other big items, such as light rail and the theatre, are in train or in planning, including those with long lead times, such as the Northside hospital, convention centre and stadium.

The shifting Budget forecasts and the long infrastructure tail allow the Opposition Leader to lambast Mr Barr for being a chronic underachiever and breaker of promises.

But she faces her own credibility gaps over how the Liberals would whip the Budget into shape when she is offering or indicating tax and rate cuts but a much more generous cost-of-living package, more neighbourhood spending, world-class health and education systems and costly infrastructure such as a stadium in the city.

Of course, what she won’t be doing is building any more light rail after Stage 2A, but that money isn’t there yet to save. The question remains how she will offer more while collecting less revenue through, for example, capping rates at 2.2 per cent in her first term.

This will also undermine Mr Barr’s tax reform program, which is designed to put the Territory’s finances on a more solid footing.

It leaves her vulnerable to Labor attacks that a Liberal Government would be economically irresponsible, slash services and shelve other infrastructure.

She could sell more land and more announcements planned closer to the election may clarify the Liberals’ economic policy. Ms Lee will be keen to avoid repeating the mistakes of her predecessor, Alistair Coe, who got into a tangle over how the Liberals would pay for their policies.

As the Chief Minister said: “Choices and trade-offs.”

Join the conversation

12
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon8:40 pm 28 Jun 24

It’s “steady-as-she-goes” towards insolvency.

Real leadership would acknowledge that the spending trajectory of the ACT government is unsustainable and likewise the revenue projections – which blithely assume that the great majority of ACT households can afford year after year of increases in rates and other charges which are above (in too many cases well above) any increases in income.

Instead, all we get from this Chief Minister, and not just in election years, is temporising, blame-shifting and denial of fiscal reality.

Domestic and international circumstances are aligning for a return to something akin to the stagflation of the 1970s. If that eventuates, the consequent pressures on the federal budget, which is already in serious structural deficit, will see the ACT in a very precarious position – which we are doing nothing to prepare for.

Someone might want to tell Barr that if you keep spending more than you earn eventually you’ll go bankrupt. Best to.see where wasted money is being spent and cancel it.

So far as cost of living is concerned this just seems to be the latest “buzz” phrase Implement by him and that incompetent clown running the country. ACTEW electricity charges are increasing by 12.75% and gas 12.5% from 1 July. Yeah a real help mate. Bring on the election. Of course he’ll still get his massive pension and not be accountable to anyone.

Satan Herself8:26 am 03 Jul 24

As long as he has his vanity projects completed before he leaves the job and moves into some cushy private enterprise position; he’s a happy fellow. He’s completely out of touch as to what his constituency needs and has been for so long I can’t remember. Yet, he’s so smug about being elected again, and why wouldn’t he be? He’s the worst treasurer, the system is as opaque as it could be and he does what he wants with our money. He’s pushing for a green city – but there is no infrastructure to support it. He needs money for that tram and he will continue to bleed the people of Canberra dry until he gets it.

You might expect Mr. Bushnell to question the Chief Minister’s ability to manage the city’s finances, especially given Mr Barr’s record budget deficits as opposed to his Federal Labor government colleagues efforts to curb public spending to help control inflation.

He might also be concerned that the Chief Minister is creating a debt burden for future households, for projects with very low cost benefit returns without Mr Barr having to pay it back himself.

But no Mr Bushnell is more focused elsewhere.

If you think Sky News is incredibly biased and partisan, just read a Bushnell article.

Anyone will be better than labor

I’m pretty sure my dog would do better.

Wouldn’t be difficult Ken. At least your dog would do as he’s told. You know. Sit, fetch, roll-over, walkies lol

Are you drunk?

The budget offers no actual “cost of living” assistance, unless you pretend that hiking rates, rego, licensing etc etc is not part of the budget. Giving with one hand and taking double with the other is all ACT Labor ever seem to do. And they spend so irresponsibly that they still continue to acrue multi generational levels of debt.

Satan Herself8:29 am 03 Jul 24

The usual “assistance” is borne by the Federal government for people holding blue concession cards. Jobseekers, as per usual get nothing but have needs – like a registered car to get a job because the public transport system is so … bad, shall I say? Barr doesn’t care about anybody but himself. You’d only need to watch the question time at the Legislative Assembly to see how smug and self assured he is that he’ll be voted back in again, to trash Canberra for another 4 years.

Strange for the second half of the article to focus on what the Liberals “might” do if they ever get into power.

How about some more detailed analysis of the long term financial management of the party that has been in charge for 20+ years rather than just repeating what Barr says each year?

Whilst no one expects him to deliver a surplus every year, he has never actually delivered one in ANY year, despite constantly predicting a surplus in the outer years of every budget he’s delivered. Despite massive increases in real revenue over that period. What are the overall impacts of massively increasing net debt? Where is the evidence that we are seeing economic returns for the large scale spending and infrastructure plans that Barr keeps touting? Particularly so when he’s already committing to projects like light rail without releasing any costs or business cases.

Far too much softball reporting from a compliant media in this town.

Satan Herself8:30 am 03 Jul 24

Yes. Riotact. Local (government) Voices. Compliant Communities.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.