9 February 2024

No delaying infrastructure, says Barr, as Budget dips deeper into red

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
Andrew Barr holdign the Budget

Chief Minister and Treasurer Andrew Barr with the Budget Review: the Territory can’t afford not to fund necessary infrastructure. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Chief Minister and Treasurer Andrew Barr has defended his government’s ambitious infrastructure program amid a deteriorating budget position and ballooning debt.

Today’s mid-year Budget Review reveals that revenue hits, higher spending and increased interest payments have blown out the expected 2023-24 ACT Budget deficit by $340 million.

The 2023-24 deficit is now expected to be $782.8 million, with another higher-than-expected deficit in 2024-25 before the Budget returns to surplus, albeit slightly lower than forecast, in 2025-26 ($100 million) and 2026-27 ($145 million).

Mr Barr said the economy and the Budget were expected to recover as interest rates stabilised or hopefully fell, along with inflation, although he admitted there was a risk that might not eventuate.

READ ALSO Police officers forced to move out of City Station for ‘foreseeable future’

A slump in GST payments as consumers cut back on their spending and payroll tax due to the Australian Public Service’s shift away from consultants and contractors to employing its own staff has contributed to a $189 million hit to revenue in 2023-24 and $99.2 million over the four years to 2026-27.

At the same time, the government will have $169.4 million more in total expenses this financial year and $619.8 million more over the forward years.

The Budget review shows extra spending of $170.6 million on services and infrastructure in 2023-24 and $308.8 million over the forward years, much of which has already been announced.

An increase in borrowing costs and extra borrowings has added $80.8 million to interest payments over the four years, while net debt has also grown by about $180 million to be $7.4 billion (an expected 13.7 per cent of Gross State Product) in 2023-24, and will now increase over the forward years to $11.6 billion in 2026-27.

Borrowings this year total $13.4 billion and will increase over the four years to $18.4 billion, with interest payments more than doubling from $334 million to $685 million in 2026-27, reflecting the government’s long-term infrastructure program.

Asked whether the ACT could afford it, Mr Barr said the question should be, can the Territory afford not to fund necessary infrastructure?

“The alternative is to delay,” he said.

But he said the government was looking to reduce the impact on the Territory’s balance sheet by attracting Commonwealth funding in 50:50 partnerships and through complementary asset sales, such as land, particularly for new housing.

He said a number of projects would not be able to proceed without Commonwealth support.

Mr Barr said the infrastructure program was operating at full pelt at a little over $1 billion a year and he hoped to cover that from a combination of the operating cash surplus, Commonwealth contributions and asset sales.

He would welcome a couple of interest rate cuts to reduce the cost of forward borrowings, but the ACT had taken advantage of the ultra-low rates available during the pandemic.

Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee said that due to Mr Barr’s poor economic management taxes would have to increase to pay for the debt.

“The figures we are seeing out of this Budget Review are staggering,” she said. “To service Andrew Barr’s staggering debt, Canberrans will be paying almost $2 million a day in interest repayments alone.

“Canberrans are right to ask, where has all the money gone?”

Ms Lee said Mr Barr was now expecting federal Labor to bail him out.

The slump in Commonwealth payments to the ACT includes $58.9 million less GST, although this is expected to recover in coming years, and $39 million in grants, but this is offset by an increase in other Commonwealth grants of $219.8 million over the four years to 2026-27, mainly due to the Commonwealth’s contribution to education and skills, roads and Light Rail Stage 2A.

Payroll tax revenue is down by $58 million and is expected to be $144.4 million lower over the four years to 2026-27.

Mr Barr said if the APS switch to insourcing continued to impact the ACT Budget, he would ask the Commonwealth for some form of compensation.

Land tax revenue is forecast to be $6.6 million lower in 2023-24 but $16.7 million higher over the four years to 2026-27, while commercial stamp duty is down by $12 million ($8.9 million lower over the forward years) as interest rates uncertainty impacted the property market.

General rates and stamp duty revenue remain as forecast.

There have also been lower dividends from the Suburban Land Agency, City Renewal Authority and Icon Water, which are expected to mean $39.5 million less coming into the government coffers over the four years, partly due to a drop in land sales.

Fewer people appear to be gambling as well. Revenue from that source is expected to be $30.7 million lower in 2023-24 and over the forward years.

But other ACT-based taxation revenue is expected to be $18 million higher over the forward years, thanks to higher than expected collections from the lease variation charge in 2023-24.

READ ALSO ‘You had 11 years to sort this out’: Replacement of non-compliant buses delayed yet again

The Budget Review papers say the ACT economy performed strongly in 2022-23 posting 4.3 per cent growth, and the outlook remains positive despite this year’s interest rate and cost of living headwinds.

Growth in 2023-24 is forecast to be slightly higher than expected at Budget, but moderating to 2.5 per cent and then picking up in 2024-25 and continuing to strengthen from 2025-26.

The ACT population increased by 2.2 per cent through the year to June 2023, but the government believes the ABS is still underestimating interstate migration, which can affect GST payments.

It is expected to grow strongly over the forward years by 2.25 per cent in 2024-25 and stabilise at a growth rate of 2 per cent after that.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

No delaying infrastructure, well build it whatever it costs. No time for a business case or even a pub test.

Hasn’t most infrastructure been delayed.. 10 years between being announced and contracts sought.

We have worse infrastructure now than we did 10 years ago, as so much has been cut or allowed to deteriorate to fund new initiatives that are not as effective or efficient as the older ones. Progress is great, but only when it’s an improvement on what you already have.

Investing in infrastructure to improve a city is good long term planning.

Investing in infrastructure that your own analysis shows is only worth 38 cents in the dollar is bad policy and throwing away money.

Mr Barr has totally lost the plot with sane investment in the best value, best return infrastructure projects for Canberra.

If I could Time Machine back a decade and ask Mr Barr whether he would choose to invest in a project that was worth less than half what it costs, I bet he’d say that wasn’t a wise decision and that’s not something he would do as a powerbroker. He’s not a dumb guy, he’s just caught in a blind spot like so many long term leaders.

No blind spot, just intentionally ignoring the needs of Canberrans to focus on political power and personal pet projects.

Infrastructure here was better 10 and even 20 years ago. More effective and more efficient as well as more cost-effective for people living here. Progress is great but only when it is an improvement.

Whilst it is still less expensive to buy here than in Sydney, the ongoing costs of maintaining a home and living here are much greater than in Sydney. Health care, food and services here are more expensive and much more limited.

Canberrans will never learn lol. Thank god I left.

So the payroll tax hit by eliminating contractors hasn’t provided any employee cost savings is what I read from your statement. What a great idea that was then hey?

We have to Vote you out of office mate. You’re hopeless.

@Michael M
You do realise that it’s the federal government that is trying to reduce the number of contractors employed in the APS don’t you? So obviously no savings for ACT government then is there.

Obviously not letting the truth hamper your politicisation of the situation are you?

Jeannie Young9:34 am 10 Feb 24

Barr is referring loss of ACT revenue (payroll tax and consumer spending) due to Commonwealth government. reduction in contractors.

Marco Prevost4:56 pm 09 Feb 24

Wow, imagine if the work experience kid hadn’t torched $77 million, certainly wouldn’t look so bad!

Barr is bankrupting us all!

They keep saying the surplus will becoming soon.

You get the feeling , we are in the red whats a bit more

HiddenDragon9:06 pm 08 Feb 24

With so few certainties in the turbulent times in which we now live, Canberrans can at least be confident of three things in leap years – the Olympic Games, a US Presidential election, and a forecast of a miraculous turnaround in the ACT budget in the lead up to a Territory election.

Look beyond the blather about the marginal ups and downs of recurrent spending and revenue and the picture emerges of longer term fiscal unsustainability, particularly the chilling news that borrowings will increase by $5 billion and annual interest payments will more than double to $685 million by 2026-27.

To put the latter figure into some perspective, $685 million will equate to more than 75% of estimated rates revenue in that year – and all of this just to keep the circus going and provide some catch-up infrastructure. This will not end well.

This Government will never deliver a surplus. Further down the toilet we go.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.