11 March 2025

Orthopedic surgeons resign over hospital 'interference' in clinical decisions

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
73

Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith has defended the Canberra Hospital’s operations centre. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith has offered an olive branch to surgeons upset at the new operations centre at Canberra Hospital but insists the centralised oversight of care will continue.

The Minister was speaking after three of the hospital’s 14 orthopedic surgeons, including head of department Professor Paul Smith, decided to resign over the role of the operations centre, which is designed to prioritise surgery according to patient need and the efficient allocation of resources.

Professor Smith, one of Australia’s most experienced orthopedic surgeons, accused the operations centre of “administrative interference in clinician decision-making”, and lack of consultation and collaboration with surgeons.

“Every gain we’ve made in terms of achieving quality of service has come at a significant cost in terms of battling with administration to try and get the resources to achieve quality,” he told the ABC.

Professor Smith resigned last week after 25 years at the Canberra Hospital.

READ ALSO There is no turning the clock back on home-based work

Orthopaedic surgeon Dr Sindy Vrancic has also resigned, claiming bureaucrats were making decisions for doctors using an algorithm, which Ms Stephen-Smith said was false.

The Minister said the operations centre was run by experienced doctors and senior nurses.

Dr Vrancic said that in the past six months, frontline doctors’ clinical autonomy had been disrupted.

“While it’s really important that we don’t impact patient care, that’s our primary focus … interference with my capacity to offer that care by an external operation centre has now reached the point where I can’t put my hand on my heart and offer the care that I believe our community deserves because of budgetary constraints,” she said.

Dr Vrancic said the new system was compromising patient safety by overriding clinical decisions of frontline doctors.

“There’s been more than one occasion where the operations centre has overridden our clinical decision and I find that unacceptable,” she said.

“I personally believe I’ve seen evidence of it impacting on direct patient care, which I cannot watch without saying something.”

Canberra Hospital emergency building

Canberra Hospital has seen surging demand this financial year but the ED has seen improvements. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Dr Vrancic said the loss of Professor Smith, whom she called a national treasure, would be huge, given not just his surgical skills but his research and teaching value.

“It is very sad when such a senior, kind surgeon decides to turn his back on a health service that he has essentially built,” she said.

“It was because of him that we have such a bespoke and specialised orthopedic team here in Canberra, and now that has been dismantled by a change of focus from the executive.”

Ms Rachel Stephen-Smith offered doctors an ‘escalation process’ to challenge operations centre decisions.

“Canberra Health Services will be consulting about that escalation process in the next couple of weeks, but it’s a real demonstration that we’ve been listening to what the clinicians have to say,” she said.

But the Minister said the hospital could not have individual clinicians make decisions without reference to the operation of the hospital as a whole, resulting in efficiencies and queue jumping.

“What we need to do and what I’ve talked to the orthopedic surgeons about is bringing together the understanding that the specialists have of the list that they are seeing, with the understanding of what is going on in the rest of the hospital and health system, including orthopedic lists that they don’t necessarily have visibility of on a day-to-day basis,” she said.

“It’s about improving transparency so that better decisions can be made in the interests of patients and with their care at the centre.”

Ms Stephen-Smith said the new approach in the hospital had already borne fruit with improvements in the emergency department and elective surgery.

“We’re not going to move away from our focus on patient centered care and ensuring that our patients are seen fairly and equitably and as quickly as possible across our hospital system, but we of course want to work with clinicians to understand how we ensure the system is also working for them and how they can be part of this journey,” she said.

READ ALSO Transforming mindsets: How public sector professionals can escape the validation job search trap

Ms Stephen-Smith said the hospital had to run more efficiently because funding was not limitless.

“We cannot see it continue to grow significantly above the rate of revenue increase, or we’re going to have to cut back significantly on other services. We hear from Canberrans that this is not what they want.”

Ms Stephen-Smith said arrangements were in place to provide locums to cover an impact on orthopedic services. In any case, at least two of the three had very limited clinical hours in the public area.

The Budget Review allocated an extra $227 million to Canberra Health Services due to surging patient demand.

Join the conversation

73
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

In the light of the publicity this fiasco has generated – i.e. the resignation of such a high profile and impeccably qualified professional over “administrative interference in clinician decision-making”, I wonder will the Opposition Health spokesperson, Leanne Castley, move a motion of no confidence in the Minister for Health.

If she does propose such a motion, it will test the mettle of the “newly minted non-governing” Greens plus the two independents.

Peter Curtis5:51 pm 12 Mar 25

The minister is full of it. She is incapable of admitting the system is a mess and pretty much dysfunctional – I am Cat 2 elective surgery and I received one of the ACT Health’s fraudulent letters stating that I would be dealt with inside 90 days and if the public system cannot deal with it alternatives would be found – now up to approx 150 days on the surgical list my hernia is about paw-paw size – up from a mango!

And Ms. Stephen-Smith is qualified to make such decisions or is it her less qualified bureaucrats making those decisions for her, IE no care no responsibility.

When medical professionals resign due to unnecessary administrative interference that directly effects the doctors and patients. It just shows the system is sick and the root cause of this who believes nothing is wrong needs to resign. Besides to whole ACT health system in the ACT is in the red and is toxic to work in.

Laurence De B. Anderson1:34 pm 12 Mar 25

‘Escalation’, ‘process,’ – in other words a long-winded, form-riddled frustration that wastes time and gets nobody anywhere.

It seems unreasonable to me that people imply a low opinion of the near-80% of doctors who did not resign.

Triage and later priorities are difficult decisions. There will always be cases where some of a large group disagree, and sometimes the minority will be right, but usually not. That is why processes exist to try to balance competing tensions.

I see little in the comments which represents a serious appraisal of anything. Riders of hobby horses are in full flow, beating the wooden frames as their wheels bog in their desert of thought.

Heywood Smith11:15 am 12 Mar 25

Wife and I spent over 6 hours at the Registrar Review Clinic, last Friday… 8.30am appointment, were seen just before 3pm!

“ Ms Rachel Stephen-Smith offered doctors an ‘escalation process’ to challenge operations centre decisions.” So they’ll spend precious time away from their actual work, arguing with the Health Department? Can’t imagine anything more time wasting and soul destroying. Time the Minister left.

To lose someone of the quality of Professor Paul Smith is a searing indictment of the ACT Health system. I don’t know the other doctors, but have met Professor Smith when he was providing medical care for a close friend of mine. Not only are his skills exemplary, he was that rare doctor, with empathy and compassion. This is a loss which will resonate and damage Canberra health system’s reputation.

Whilst ensuring consistency and equity of care is a reasonable aim, i’m wondering if the “operations centre” has also overriden front line doctors calls so that patients received faster or higher priority care than recommended?

Because from the way the article is written, it seems to only be going one way, in overriding more “enthusiastic” doctors attempts to get better and faster care for their patients.

Which doesn’t exactly fill you with confidence around the actual aims of the service.

When I went to Canberra Hospital Emergency for an emergency eye issue I got referred to Sydney. Had to make my own way there that day. From my experience our health system is broken.

Did you enquire about the ACT interstate patient travel assistance scheme (ACT iptas)?

IDK what your problem was, and I hope it has been sorted out for you you.

But we’re still a regional centre and not every issue can be covered. Similarly there’s plenty of people from Yass who have to come to the ACT for treatment. Australia is a big country and health care is expensive. As JS points out there is a travel assistance program.

We hear from Canberrans that this is not what they want

Yes it is.. can the tram…

Give it a rest mate, that…tram…has sailed.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.