9 February 2025

'Overall positive attitude' to ACT's cannabis laws but some 'wrinkles' need ironing out, new study finds

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
57

Households in the ACT are allowed to grow no more than four plants each. Photo: Ralf Hahn.

Grace (not her real name) suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic autoimmune disease causing swelling, stiffness and loss of function in the joints. For more than a decade, prescription medication was the only way to deal with it.

But that all changed in 2020 when the ACT became the first jurisdiction in Australia to decriminalise the home cultivation of cannabis.

“I have found cannabis to give me more relief than the other two medications that I’m on,” Grace told Region.

“I’m still on medication, so this is a supplementary thing on top of my medication … There are anti-inflammatory effects, but for me, there’s still a fair amount of pain, so it’s also a get-home-and-relax thing, a bit of a break from the pain a couple times a week.

“It also helps me sleep because I get a fair bit of pain when I’m sleeping, and it can wake me up.”

READ ALSO QUIZ: Can you recognise the Canberra road in the ’70s? Plus 9 other questions

A survey of 311 household cannabis growers in the ACT – like Grace – has revealed an “overall positive attitude” to the law change, but there is still some lingering confusion around the legal limits.

The University of Sydney’s Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics invited growers from the Territory to complete a “detailed survey” about their cannabis use and also submit a sample of their product for chemical analysis.

Results showed 12 per cent of current cultivators were growing it for ‘medicinal-only’ use, 34 per cent for ‘non-medicinal-only’ use, 44 per cent for ‘dual use’, with 10 per cent not currently using it.

Almost half of the respondents said they grew their own cannabis to “avoid interacting with criminal networks”.

The study invited respondents to send in samples of their cannabis for chemical analysis. Photo: Janie C Bros.

Cannabis use among the cohort was relatively modest, at around one gram a day, and most of the cannabis grown was relatively low potency, with a mean of 9 per cent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive compound in cannabis (30 per cent is considered high).

Most cannabis analysed was within recommended limits for pesticide residues and heavy metals such as arsenic and lead, and mould.

Project leader Professor Iain McGregor concluded it was clear “you can allow Australian adults to cultivate their own cannabis for medical and non-medical purposes without any obvious adverse outcomes”.

“Cultivators exit illegal networks, enjoy the process of cultivation, and grow cannabis of modest potency and decent quality that doesn’t cost an arm and a leg,” he said.

The ACT’s decriminalisation of home-grown cannabis followed in the footsteps of Canada, Uruguay, Germany, Netherlands, Mexico and some states of the US largely, as the study notes, to “reduce the burden on police and the judicial system imposed by trivial drug offences”.

Professor McGregor said this goal seems to have worked in the ACT, too, with “no overall increase in cannabis use, emergency presentations or driving offences”.

“There are lessons here around incremental drug reform that other Australian jurisdictions can learn from.”

READ ALSO Netflix film crew falls in love with ‘Canberra’s Kakadu’ while shooting survivalist thriller

However, study lead author Dr Cilla Zhou noted inevitable “wrinkles” within the ACT’s legislation that need to be “ironed out”.

For example, a household is allowed to grow no more than four plants and have no more than 50 grams of dried cannabis at any one time, but the study found this to be a “mismatch”.

More than three-quarters of survey respondents found they were yielding higher-than-legal quantities of cannabis from their four plants.

“Australian cultivators grow a median of 85 grams of dry matter and 285 grams of fresh matter per plant,” Dr Zhou said.

“Current laws do not specify how cultivators might limit their harvest when their legal number of plants yield illegal quantities of cannabis. Further refinement of the relevant legislation, passed in 2020, would prevent unintended illegal activity.”

There was also the fact purchasing and supplying cannabis seeds or cuttings remains illegal.

In Grace’s case, she sourced cuttings by “word of mouth”.

“Basically, I went to the people I used to buy it off before I started growing it myself,” she said.

“I have heard people will buy seeds and seedlings online, but there’s always the risk of where it’s coming from. So it’s all still a bit dodgy, but once you have your own plants and can cross-pollinate and stuff like that, it’s different. You don’t have to go back to those people.”

She said there was also “a lot of frustration” around the fact it is still illegal to drive with traces of cannabis in your system, and a medical prescription is no defence.

“Obviously, there are people who are going to skirt around the laws and do the wrong thing, but that’s like anything,” Grace said.

“But I definitely feel much more comfortable now knowing that I’ve grown it, in a nice system, and I know there are no nasties in it.”

Join the conversation

57
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Quite simple really. Use canabis etc as much as you like. Just don’t don’t go out and share your impaired state with other people.

Travelled in a car once with a regular user and it was like they had no connection to reality. Never again!

Capital Retro11:09 am 11 Feb 25

Reality is an illusion caused by lack of drugs.

Stop booking drivers with a bit of inactive pot in their system. It’s not making the roads safer

Keeping burnout stoners off the road is definitely making it safer.

Mr. Petersson and the ACT Government must be over the moon we are now the drug dealer support location for mind numbing, illicit & deadly Drug Capital of Australia, wait until you lose someone to drugs and let me know what you think then.

Drug dealing is still illegal and if you want “mind numbing” substances you can walk into any pub, club or bottle-o. So this is a dumb argument.

One thing NOT talked about in any of the rejigged cannabis regulation is the increase in mental health issues that have occurred in every single instance elsewhere on the planet. Every single US State that has legalised cannabis mental health issues have sky-rocketed. Cannabis is NOT a harmless narcotic. That should be the starting point of any legalisation push, and it isn’t.

None of that is backed up with real data, none of that is true.

@Rob
“Every single US State that has legalised cannabis mental health issues have sky-rocketed.”
There are studies which suggest that cannabis legalisation, in some US states, has been associated with increased mental health issues, while other studies have found no significant association.

For example, this article (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9925044/) reports on a US study, which came to the conclusion that ‘state medical and recreational cannabis policies were not associated with a statistically significant increase in rates of psychosis-related health outcomes’.

Yes it’s something that should be studied and reported to see any increase in mental health issues. I can go back to the 80’s and a mate of mine who was a stoner became more and more paranoid and eventually never left his house. We wondered if it was the dope. Then my sons mate, same thing, he ended up having an episode at a local club one Anzac Day convinced people were following him and talking about him. There’s plenty of anecdotal evidence that it affects some individuals mental health.

There are dozens of studies showing that cannabis use can and does induce psychosis and cause even psychotic consitions like schizophrenia. People also become heavily dependent on it. There’s nothing “safe” about using psychoactive drugs.

The same can be said about alcohol. It’s a dumb argument.

We aren’t talking about alcohol though, so your whataboutism is irrelevant.

It’s entirely relevant, your not having an answer doesn’t change the the fact that alcohol has many of the same issues you’re railing against with cannabis.

Hypocrisy loses again. Thanks for playing.

Yeah, nah, it really isn’t. We are talking about cannabis. Your “but what about alcohol!” Is nothing but deflection. Using cannabis is not safe, at all.

Yeah, nah it is.

You don’t get to ignore relevant points because you don’t have an answer.

Alcohol is legal and has all the same issues that you’re whinging about with your overblown anti-cannabis drivel.

Why isn’t this grow at home taxed? You need a licence to drive what about some income from home growers.

“Why isn’t this grow at home taxed?”

Seriously? Because they’re not selling it.

Growing tobacco for personal use is banned, entirely because it can’t be taxed. This stuff should be no different.

Whilst not legal there’s virtually no one policing people growing tobacco for personal use all the prosecutions are large in scale.
https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/tax-avoidance/the-fight-against-tax-crime/news-and-results/case-studies/illicit-tobacco-case-studies

Selling homegrown cannabis is illegal the same as tobacco. BTW Cannabis has a medicinal benefit so you’re missing the point as usual.

Amusingly, the medical benefits are not from the THC. If people cared about the medical benefits, they’d be buying the CBD extracts etc. So you’re being deliberately dishonest, yet again.

Amusingly, the ATO article you linked shows the ridiculous penalty that can apply for growing tobacco, even for personal use. Up to 10 years jail, $412,500 in fines, or both. And it doesn’t cause psychiatric incidents like dope does.

Ken M, you appear to be incorrect about CBD and THC. Both of CBD and THC are reported to have therapeutic effects, with the combination producing more favourable user reports of effectiveness. There are also medical formulations in pills rather than plants. Some patients prefer CBD-only specifically to avoid the psychoactive effects of THC as a personal preference, not because it is more effective. So, people caring about the reported medical benefits will use the complete product.

I have never seen any study confirm that THC has any theraputic benefits. Even the TGA website only says “THC may also be responsible for some of the medicinal effects of cannabis”.

https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/reference-material/guidance-use-medicinal-cannabis-australia-patient-information

As you see there, Ken M, the TGA makes no distinction between CBD and THC in terms of the possibility of therapeutic effects, consistent with U.S. information I consulted. Click on “Sources” at the bottom of this article: https://www.healthline.com/health/cbd-vs-thc#takeaway
One of those speaks of (very) weak evidence that cannabis products may be beneficial for some psychiatric disorders.

I have not argued that either of CBD or THC (or about a hundred other cannabinoids) is actually effective. Please note my careful wording in relation to that in my prior post.

“Amusingly, the medical benefits are not from the THC.”

I didn’t say anything about THC I said “cannabis” so yet again it is you who is being dishonest.

There needs to be more research but there’s plenty of evidence to suggest medical benefits.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425767/

BTW Amusingly you haven’t proven your contention that “dope” causes “psychiatric incidents”.

And equally amusingly no one was suggesting growing tobacco was legal, but show me any prosecution where someone had only small quantities for personal use… You can’t.

Thanks for playing.

“…notably young individuals with pre-existing mental health problems and individuals exposed to high levels of THC”.

Proof only that you can google, reading and understanding…not so much.

Cherry picking a single line from 3 studies that say cannabis is known to cause psychosis. 🤣

Never change seanocchio. Your dishonesty knows no bounds.

LOL it’s in the conclusion to the study you haven’t read Ken.

The only person being dishonest here as always is you, genius stuff.

The study that confirms what I said? Cannabis use can and does cause psychosis, and psychotic illnesses like schizophrenia. All you have pulled out is that it is even worse for people with pre-existing conditions. Keep proving me right though, seanocchio. 🤣

You’d know if you read the study that it’s notably talking about people with mental illness or those with high levels of THC.

The same can be said of alcohol use.

Once again your not understanding doesn’t make you right; the only dishonesty here is yours.

Protip: read first then post.

I’m understanding perfectly. All 3 studies confirm my statement. Cannabis use causes psychosis, and is not safe. You can continue to lie all you like, but that won’t make my assertion even slightly wrong.

It’s not what they say, so we’ll have to add the inability to read scientific papers to your failings, Kenbo.

However it was also beside the point, another failing the inability to understand logical arguments, alcohol has all the same issues you’re whinging about with cannabis.

Once again thx for playing.

It is exactly what they say, and you are telling lies, yet again seanocchio.

It’s though so there’s that.

Alcohol has all the same issues you’re whinging about with cannabis.

Name-calling is all you have when you lose.

I have no issue with a Doctors certificate to use C where expert opinion deems it necessary. However, anyone who uses it needs to doso under home supervision. I can’t believe the Brains Trust here have decided Canberra roads are safe to drive on. Deterants in place don’t;
‘t work as our court history proves. I would rather see recreational users banned from using but must detox before getting any other social benefits. We might have to take them out the bush for awhile.

It’s illegal to drug drive as it is to drink drive. Whether personal use of cannabis is criminalised or not doesn’t change that.

We have always largely relied on the majority of people to be sensible, but we have RBT and serious punishments for those who are caught not doing the right thing.

It is legal to drive with alcohol in your system as long as you are under .05

Canberra being filled with potheads really does explain a lot.

I thought that Cocaine was the drug of choice in Canberra.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.