21 August 2024

Parliament poised to criminalise sharing sexual 'deepfakes' as survey reveals AI concerns

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
10
launch of a report in Old Parliament House

Associate Professor Tanya Notley, Western Sydney University; Senator David Pocock; Professor Sora Park, University of Canberra; and Dr Simon Chambers, Western Sydney University: the majority of adults wanted regulation to mitigate potential AI harms. Photo: UWS.

A new law that will criminalise the non-consensual online publishing of sexual material created by artificial intelligence (AI) to make it appear someone is doing something they never did (known as ‘deepfakes’) could be passed by the Senate later this week.

The federal government’s Criminal Code Amendment (Deepfake Sexual Material) Bill 2024 was passed by the House of Representatives in July and referred to a Senate Committee, which recommended it be made law urgently. The bill imposes a six-year imprisonment term for people who share digitally altered pornographic content without the consent of the person depicted, such as superimposing someone’s face on an image of a person having sex.

“[The bill] is currently caught in a legislative logjam in the Senate but may pass as part of a guillotine this week,” Independent ACT Senator David Pocock said.

A guillotine is when a majority of Senators agree to end debate and vote on a bill quickly. The legislation was debated on Monday (19 August) and is expected to become law with the support of the Greens and independents later this week.

READ ALSO You can’t pork there, mate: Dead boar found dumped at Coombs bus stop

Senator Pocock said reform was important given the results of a new survey revealing many Australians had concerns about AI.

He held a press conference at Parliament House to launch Adult Media Literacy in 2024: Australian Attitudes, Experiences and Needs, which was jointly produced by the University of Canberra, University of Western Sydney and Queensland University of Technology.

“The findings from this survey reflect what I have been hearing from the community and align with some of the big debates we are having up in parliament,” Mr Pocock said.

“The survey found that four in 10 adult Australians have experimented with generative AI services … but crucially, what it also identified was strong concern about this technology and that the majority of adults wanted regulation to mitigate potential harms.”

The Senator said it’s not just sexual images that are a problem and wants to see reforms broader than just the sexual deepfakes bill.

“Almost half [40 per cent] of the world’s population will head to the polls this year and we are already witnessing bold attempts to influence election outcomes through AI,” he said.

“From Robocalls in [US] President Biden’s voice telling people not to vote in the New Hampshire primaries to Queensland premier Steven Miles sporting some truly awful dance moves … the risk lies in the realms of deepfake democracy – where a general population with low digital literacy lacking confidence in their own ability to spot AI content – can be fooled … where misinformation takes hold and spreads like wildfire.

“Together with tougher laws and better-resourced regulators, we can manage the risks while maximising the opportunity from our digital world and AI in particular.”

READ ALSO Government promises to get ‘tougher’ on Canberra’s epidemic of derelict local shops

Associate Professor Tanya Notley, who led the media literacy report and survey, called for more education.

“Most adult Australians are not confident about their ability to identify false and misleading information online, create a video and post it online, edit a digital photo, change social media privacy settings, or seek help from relevant authorities if they are being harassed online,” she said.

“We found that there is overwhelming demand among Australians for adult and school-based media literacy education. However, too many Australians have not received any form of media literacy education, or they don’t have access to support when they need it.”

Join the conversation

10
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Plenty of deep fakes shining seats in Parliament House

The effect of this will be more censorship.
YouTube will be blocked. Free speech is not protected in Australia. The independents are just greens.

The problem they are trying to solve won’t be solved by this. However it will likely catch out many innocent people. What does digitally altered mean? If someone uses an AI filter to remove wrinkles does that count.

AI is going to make it much harder for unions to justify their existence.

@gooterz
I’m struggling to decide whether you are illiterate or just taking the p*ss.

How will legislation that will “criminalise the non-consensual online publishing of sexual material created by artificial intelligence (AI)” impact freedom of speech or ‘catch out many innocent people’?

Seems like your bent against independents (and greens?) has impeded your capacity for critical thinking.

Another absolute waste of time being pursued by Pocock. The Federal “regulate everything” version of Rattenbury it seems.

I’m far more concerned about the authoritarian control of information these people are chasing under the thin guise of “safety” than I am about AI generated porn.

@Ken M
It’s not AI generated porn they are targetting, it’s “non-consensual online publishing of sexual material created by artificial intelligence”. You do understand the concept of consent don’t you?

There is no actual person involved to gain consent from. It’s a digital rendering. It’s also, yet again, not a real problem. It’s about control of information.

@Ken M
While we all know informing yourself, is not something you do before posting comments, I foolishly assumed that even you could understand the phrase “… digitally altered pornographic content without the consent of the person depicted, such as superimposing someone’s face on an image of a person having sex …” relates to the ‘digital rendering’ of an actual person.

No matter how much you love the flavour of leather and polish, JS, it still isn’t a real problem. It is regulation and control of something that wasn’t in need of any.

@Ken M
Just because you say it isn’t a real problem, doesn’t make it so.

As usual, you and facts are demonstrably nowhere near being in the same postcode.

And to think, we wouldn’t have to suffer the “The government must regulate everything because I can’t get through life without being told what to do!” types like JS, if we had just removed the warning labels from everything and let Mr Darwin claim his bounty.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.