31 January 2025

Phone tower decision puzzles government-backed grasslands group

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
49

Friends of Ainslie Volcanic Grasslands say their taxpayer-funded conservation work is under threat. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

A mobile phone tower is to be built in Ainslie on land that a local conservation group has been given thousands of taxpayer dollars to rehabilitate.

The Friends of Ainslie Volcanic Grasslands have been working to restore native temperate grasses to the land at the corner of Limestone Avenue and Quick Street for the past three years with backing from Transport Canberra and City Services.

It received a $14,000 government grant in 2023-24 to continue their project.

But the Territory Planning Authority approved the construction of the 28-metre high tower for Optus and Vodaphone last October, saying the Conservator of Flora and Fauna had advised the site was covered in exotic grasses and had no ecological value.

READ ALSO Markets operator faces competition as government puts old bus depot out to tender

But Friends member Marianne Albury-Colless said the group had been progressively working down the slope behind the tower site and had started plantings on its edge.

The project was intended to cover the entire patch of open land, but that was now uncertain. Ms Albury-Colless said the tower construction would encroach on about a third of the area where the Friends had been working.

Ms Albury-Colless said the Friends feared the construction and the movement of trucks and machinery would interfere with their work and impact already restored grasses.

She said it appeared to be a case of one hand of government not knowing what the other was doing.

“It just seems to me to be such a strange disconnect between what the Planning Authority does and what the people who are trying to rehabilitate natural grassland and grassy woodlands are doing,” Ms Albury-Colless said.

“I used to work with the federal government and we’re very aware of silos, and I think it’s a silo effect”.

A photo montage showing what the tower will look like from Limestone Avenue. Photo: Indara.

The Friends had intended to take the matter to the ACT Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal but discovered the decision could not be appealed.

Ms Albury-Colless said the Friends were not opposed to a mobile phone tower to improve services for Ainslie residents, just this particular site, saying a better, more secluded site was available nearby next to Ainslie Village.

They are calling on Minister Chris Steel to overrule the decision and Indara, which will build the tower, to reconsider the alternative site, which it had dismissed due to access issues and electricity wires.

A government spokesperson said Mr Steel did not have the power to intervene, and it was up to Indara to reconsider the site and lodge another DA.

Ms Albury-Colless said the site next to Ainslie Village was a wide strip of land and the only wires were attached to a single pole at the bottom. Access was available from a dirt road.

She said the Limestone Avenue site was “unbelievably easy for them” and “probably an economic gift”.

Independent MLA Thomas Emerson backed the call for Indara to use the alternative site and has written to Mr Steel and the company.

Mr Emerson said the Planning Authority’s decision didn’t make sense.

“The ACT Government has provided grant funding to support the work of volunteers in preserving and restoring these grasslands,” he said.

“It’s patently unfair to turn around and approve a significant industrial structure on this site.

“This is an example of the left hand forgetting the right hand even exists. It just doesn’t make sense.

“Surely we can achieve the same telecommunications uplift without the unnecessary environmental and aesthetic damage.”

The alternative site for the tower favoured by Friends of Ainslie Volcanic Grasslands. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

While Indara said it will plant mature trees around the tower to screen it, Ms Albury-Colless said it would still dominate the corner.

The Planning Authority was satisfied that this screening would be sufficient and considered that the tower’s visual dominance would be limited given the street light and adjacent buildings, although there are residential homes directly opposite on Quick Street.

Indara had also redesigned the antenna component to lessen the tower’s visual impact.

READ ALSO ACT faces animal crisis: RSPCA says parvovirus incident shows the move to a new site is urgent

The Planning Authority said Indara would have to provide a Construction Environment Management Plan to ensure there was no impact on ecological communities.

Last November, ACT Conservation Council executive director Simon Copland said the tower would significantly impact endangered temperate grasslands and further threaten endangered ACT species, including the Golden Sun Moth, Striped Legless Lizard, The Button Wrinklewort and Gang-Gang Cockatoo.

“We cannot afford to lose any more of these ecosystems,” Mr Copland said.

“Construction and development of the telecommunications tower infrastructure will introduce invasive species, light and noise pollution, roads and vehicles. As a result, the ecosystem will no longer perform a habitat function for species dependent on the ecosystem.”

A 2023 Friends petition to the Legislative Assembly called for the site to be protected as part of the Mount Ainslie Reserve, attracting almost 600 signatures.

Join the conversation

49
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

If done correctly, and all the environmental protocols for reinstatement are followed, you’ll barely notice it once it’s built.
“IF”

If they send the ham-fisted neanderthals who recently upgraded the tower on the pedestrian bridge between Chisholm and Gowrie, it’ll be an eyesore………

If they don’t want it in their backyard don’t build it . Let them use starlink instead.

This article nicely sums up what’s wrong with the elites of Canberra.

The government that is heavily in debt, but has a spare $14,000 to give to the self-appointed “Friends” of the empty block, to do a bit of weeding and plant some seedlings that will mostly die.

The rich people of Ainslie who want a new mobile tower to for all their 5G devices, but don’t want that tower in their backyard, instead pushing it into the backyard of the poor people of Ainslie Village.

The Conservation Council who has their knickers in a twist because there might be some unusual critters living in the long grass of that empty block, and god forbid a lizard get disturbed.

The shiny new independent MLA who is struggling to find relevance sitting on the Assembly cross-bench, so decides this issue will give himself something to do.

The Journalist who forgets to check the Territory Plan, that shows the most of the vacant area under discussion is reserved for a connecting road to Monash Drive when it gets built.

John Pedestrian7:15 am 02 Feb 25

Priceless 🙂

brucewantstobecool2:56 pm 01 Feb 25

So rather than utilise a small corner near a major thoroughfare that still allows the great majority of the restoration project to continue, the concerned citizens of Ainslie want to instead install the tower closer to the actual reserve and on top of the low income housing residents at Ainslie Village. Win-win, they say, seemingly ignoring the low income residents in favour of weed infested grassland. Not surprising given previous angst from the concerned citizens of Ainslie over entirely appropriate social housing developments in their suburb.

What is wrong with having both? The only disturbance to the area would happen when building the tower,

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.