17 January 2025

New battery-powered light rail vehicles slip quietly into service

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
93
New LRV017

The new LRV017 was spotted recently at the Alinga Street light rail stop in the city. Photo: Amy Jelacic/X.

Four of five new battery-powered light rail vehicles are now in Canberra and two are already in work on the Gungahlin to City line.

Keen public transport observers have spotted the new light rail vehicles (LRV), which progressively arrived with little fanfare last year from Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) factory in Spain.

Transport Canberra said the LRVs were in various stages of testing, commissioning and acceptance.

Two had reached preliminary acceptance and were currently in service while the other two were in the final phase of testing before entering service in the first quarter of the year.

The new LRVs are pre-fitted with an Onboard Energy Storage System, required for wire-free running on Stage 2A from Alinga Street to Commonwealth Park and a section of the proposed Stage 2B route through the Parliamentary Triangle on the way to Woden.

All of the original 14-strong fleet are being progressively retrofitted for wire-free operation ahead of Stage 2A services starting in 2028.

READ ALSO Electric buses sent back to manufacturer for rehab after running out of puff

The five new LRVs will allow existing vehicles to be taken out of service for the work without affecting the light rail timetable.

Other features of the new models include enhanced hearing loop coverage, which helps people with hearing difficulties, within the passenger saloon; upgraded passenger display information in the interior and on the exterior of carriages; and an anti-drag safety system on the passenger doors.

The National Capital Authority required Stage 2 to be wire-free to preserve the heritage vistas.

The five additional battery-powered LRVs were ordered in 2022.

These will be charged as the LRV travels along the wired sections of track, supplemented by a regenerative braking system where the motor acts as a generator during deceleration.

The Mitchell depot has been expanded to fit the new LRVs.

Construction of the 1.7km Stage 2A is due to start next month as the enabling project to create a level intersection at London Circuit and Commonwealth Avenue enters its final stages,.

Join the conversation

93
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Saul Goodman12:52 pm 19 Jan 25

so much droning negativity about ACT light rail-trams.

you realise there’s expectations of a much bigger local population in years to come?

to read the remarks of many critics now and in past few years is akin to reading abbott era criticisms of 2010 NBN proposal such as this gem – “only people who want NBN are perverts trying to download faster porn!”……..and then came 2020-covid and many industries thanked NBN concept for allowing many to work from home, keeping their industries afloat.

Leon Arundell5:09 pm 19 Jan 25

Canberra’s growing population means that in ten years we will have to upgrade Adelaide Avenue’s T2 lanes to T3 lanes to keep them uncongested, and some time after 2046 we will need to upgrade the T3 lanes to bus rapid transit (at half the cost of light rail).

As a scientist in the field of renewable energy, I must say that this is the STUPIDEST idea I have ever seen. You should almost always use the cabled electricity whenever it is possible. Batteries are still expensive, relatively unsafe; they have short life, needs time to recharge, and negatively impact the “duck curve”.

Think you miss the use case. They will still run on wires but need to be able to travel about 2km between wired charging opportunities. The batteries are only meant to cover that gap.

They only nees th batteries for the 2km gap. They will use wired power the rest of the time.

You may think it stupid but it’s a requirement of the Capital Authority.

An odd comment for a supposed physics PhD. It was not the local government’s decision not to cable the run through the triangle. They have no option.

Take time to charge? Golly, gee whiz. Relatively unsafe? Short life? Sounds like the usual spurious talking points.

Concentrate on physics, if that is a reality. Given you seem to be starting behind, check out Galileo and go from there.

I agree. If Melbourne can have wires outside parliament, so can Canberra (sounds like it will outside the Assembly), but the RWFW “LIBERAL” appointed NCA tried to wreck the LR by making it harder and more expensive. Don’t blame Barr or the Greens for this stupidity, nor the Greens. Even Brunel’s Grade I Listed Maidenhead Railway Bridge have had overhead fitted for the Great Western Line to Bristol / Cornwall. They just altered the spacing so the staunchions line up with the brickwork supporting the bridge, and lit looks quite good. Canberra’s bridges were built last week, by comparison.

Leon Arundell5:12 pm 19 Jan 25

Buses can make the trip in 18 minutes. Light rail will take at least 25 minutes. That’s why the government expects that Stage 2 will reduce the ACT’s public transport travel by 5%, The need for battery operation will add at least another 2 minutes.

Wherever you got your PhD from, it obviously didn’t provide much value, nor basic skills of comprehension it seems. The premise is they’ll only run under batteries when they need to…..

I wonder if the purchasing, trialling, acceptance and introduction to service of these trams, was included in Stage A’s costs?

I wonder further if the inability to construct overhead wires through the parliamentary triangle was even considered.

On top of that, the tram’s lack of ability to scale the Everest like State Circle probably wasn’t on the horizon either.

Inept.

Totally wrong actually. From day dot of the first stage it was known the NCA (the unelected body that controls planning in the parl triangle and other “import” locations in the ACT) made it clear wired would not be allowed in the triangle.

So from the beginning the requirement for future wire free running was factored into the project and was one of the reason the CAF trams were chosen as when the time came for them to need batteries they could easily be retrofitted. Which will happen to the original deliveries soon.

As for grades getting into state circle again all factored in and was why the ACT governments prodded route was not state circle. But again dealing with an unelected body.

So call it what you will it’s far from inept.

JC,
The NCA is no more an “unelected body” than the ACT Government’s planning authority is.

Leon Arundell2:05 pm 17 Jan 25

This is part of the government’s $2+ billion plan to reduce public transport travel by 5% (relative to the base case), as per Figure 7-7 of the City to Woden Light Rail: Stage 2A City to Commonwealth Park Business Case : https://www.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1758178/Stage-2A-Light-Rail-Business-Case-redacted.pdf

They will increase. The option not to work will be removed to live in Canberra as everyone will be taxed through the roof and be the working poor. No one will be able to afford a car

So, ‘relative to base case’. What does that actually mean? An adjustment in forecasts?
The reference you provided is well over a hundred pages long. Some detail of where in the document would be helpful. Likewise reference to the ‘base case’ and where there-in is the relevant data.
Can’t help thinking that, as it stands, the comment is partisan and meant to engender a perception that actual patronage will fall by 5% (quite unbelievable in the light of the widely reported success of stage 1) as a consequence of providing light rail.

Roger,
What “widely reported success” of stage 1? Perhaps you can link it?

Quite unbelievable in the face of still not meeting the 2021 patronage targets for Stage 1 that were included in the government’s own business case. You know the one that outlined a transport benefit of 20c in the dollar.

Can’t help but thinking your comment is partisan as it stands.

Leon Arundell3:04 pm 18 Jan 25

What part of “Figure 7-7” do you not understand? Light rail stage 1 was faster than buses. In its first 9 months, in combination with a month of free travel and a 4% increase in the remaining bus services, stage 1 increased the ACT’s per capita public transport patronage by 11%. Stage 2 will not increase patronage, because it will take more than 27 minutes to do a trip that a bus can do in 18 minutes.

Thank you for mentioning fig 7.7. it would have been valuable to your comment to reference that in the first place. There does seem to be a caveat though. see Footnote 107 on page 134 of the report you linked.

Seems to me there is a big difference between headlined reports in the Canberra Times, the Riotact, ABC TV, and radio; and a comment drawing on a particular unreferenced detail in a well over 100 page report.
In answer to your question, reference examples include The Riotact 1st and 3rd May 2024 and Rail Express 3rd May 2024. (BTW Rail Express is Australia wide).

Roger,
Leon did “mention” the reference in the first place, you simply didn’t read or comprehend the comment.

I know reading may be hard for light rail supporters, but the report linked is the government’s own evidence showing that light rail does not remotely stack up economically nor improve public transport usage for the city.

And the construction costs have significantly increased since that report was written making the return even worse.

As above, one can’t help thinking your comments are partisan in ignoring the actual evidence.

Leon Arundell5:05 pm 19 Jan 25

Roger S If you bother to read my original comment, you will notice that I DID refer to fig. 7-7. Does footnote 107 change the report’s conclusions that stage 2 will reduce public transport travel and increase car travel?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.