30 July 2024

Light rail is safe but this is what could make it even safer, says study

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
29

A car and a Light Rail Vehicle collided on 7 July 2022. This has been the most common form of incident and an area safety measures should focus on, the Monash University report says. Photo: John Mikita.

Drivers running red lights and pedestrians crossing against red signals and at inappropriate places have been behind most Canberra light rail incidents since the line opened in 2019.

A new study from Monash University has found light rail to be a well-designed and safe means of transportation and the public perceives it to be safe, and the level of risky behaviour is low.

But it warns against complacency and recommends a mix of countermeasures, education and enforcement to make the network even safer, especially when it is to be extended in the coming years, will carry more passengers and have more interaction with traffic.

READ ALSO Turbulence ahead for Rex after share trading halted and rumours of restructure in face of continued losses

The study looked at the four years from April 2019 to May 2023, in which there were only 18 incidents. It does not discuss near misses.

Twelve accidents (67%) involved a motor vehicle and six (33%) a pedestrian or cyclist.

In 10 of the motor vehicle incidents, a red light was disobeyed, with drivers generally making right-hand turns and proceeding into the path of a Light Rail Vehicle, either colliding with the side of an LRV or a Light Rail Vehicle colliding with the side of the motor vehicle.

The study says traffic lights for vehicles and LRVs should be kept well apart, more time allowed for lights to change, warning signs installed, raised platforms should be added on approach to high-risk intersections and lower speed limits mandated for motor vehicles.

“Flashing warning lights that are integrated into signs and activated when a Light Rail Vehicle is approaching the intersection could also be considered to warn motor vehicle drivers of the approaching danger and provide them with ample time to stop,” the study says.

Pedestrians also disobeyed red lights at crossings, and a site inspection found undesignated rail crossings marked by trampled vegetation, marking out unofficial trails.

The study suggests pedestrian signals should be embedded into the pavement to prevent pedestrians from crossing against red signals and installing extra controlled crossing points.

It also says low walls or other barriers near garden beds near stops could discourage crossing, particularly at risky locations.

The study found that ACT light rail safety campaigns were well recognised by the public and recommended they continue.

An online survey found 70.7 per cent of respondents reported they were aware of a Light Rail safety campaign.

READ ALSO Public servants getting a ‘reasonable’ right to disconnect (whatever that means)

Respondents were also positive towards the adequacy of light rail infrastructure, with 84.6 per cent saying road signs are adequate, 77 per cent that road markings are adequate, 76.3 per cent that street lighting is adequate and 73.3 per cent that the external lights on Light Rail Vehicles are adequate.

They were also asked about risky behaviour, including motor vehicles, motorcycles, bikes, scooters, skateboards or rollerblades travelling along the tracks; vehicles or motorcycles failing to give way to LRVs or speeding near them; and LRVs speeding.

High numbers said they had never seen such behaviour, although only 33.9 per cent said they had never seen motor vehicles or motorcycles travelling at unsafe speeds when near LRVs.

Join the conversation

29
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell9:02 am 13 Aug 24

I support light rail wherever and whenever it is the most cost-effective option. The ACT Government concluded that bus rapid transit between Gungahlin and Civic would be twice as cost-effective as light rail, and that doing nothing would be more cost-effective than building light rail stage 2a. Bus lanes between Civic and Woden will be twice as fast as light rail, at a tiny fraction of the cost, and can meet projected public transport demand along that route until 2046.

I’m a big believer in natural selection and should leave well enough alone as we can only nanny state so much. God knows the heard needs some thinning. Not even that bastion of law abiding citizens the Federal Police can get it right as they too have had an ‘interaction’ with the light rail! Perhaps we need to go back to the early horseless carriage days when there was a person who walked in front of the said horseless carriage and waved a flag and fired a shot in the air at each intersection to warn the public of the carriage’s imminent arrival.
It would seem that the only way is to keep the general populace safe from themselves would be the erection of an attractive 20-foot-high electrified fence along the full length of the track with interlocks at intersections and stops to manage access. That’d look nice, wouldn’t it? A viable alternative could be to give Mr Musk a ring and see what the Tunnel Boring Co can do for us. No more worries about interactions between Darwin Award candidates and the light rail, no overhead wires and if Elon was on board so to speak, would be finished in record time and on budget. Wouldn’t that be a positive change?

Leon Arundell9:16 am 04 Aug 24

Stage 2 of light rail will be safer than stage 1. Stage 1 travels at an average speed of 28 km/h. Stage 2 will average less than 24 km/h.

You have been a vocal critic of the tram over the years Leon Arundell but very misleading in your regular comments to this site and other media.

Maybe you should be more up-front in citing evidence when making your usual false and deceptive comments!

Leon Arundell3:52 pm 09 Aug 24

Can Jack D cite any evidence (other than baseless and very misleading ad-hominem ‘arguments’) to disprove the government’s claims that Stage 2 will take 30 minutes per trip, and that Stage 1 takes 26 minutes per trip?

I really don’t know where to start with your frequent and misleading comments on the rollout of the light rail network in Canberra Leon Arundell. I am one of those unfortunate commuters who used to live in Gungahlin and remember the congested bus only network. Flemington Road and Northbourne Avenue were particularly bad for commuters during peak hours, with long delays in getting to work or appointments. The Liberals anti-tram, bus only transport policy which they are taking to the election brings back those unfortunate memories, a bus only service that can’t even make it down Commonwealth Avenue, over the bridge and on to Woden!

Light rail now takes only 24 minutes to get from Gungahlin to the City. A safe and comfortable transport option, it is 99.99% on time 7 days a week and popular with those who travel on it. There are up to 15,000 bus trips a day with less traffic and road congestion!

As you are well aware, contracts for stage 1 and 2A of the project are public and can be found by doing a simple Google search or looking on the ACT Government website. Stage 2B will be released when finalised with negotiations still in progress due to the complexity of the project. Travel times between the city and Woden are yet to be finalised but estimated to be less than 30 minutes with travelers entering and exiting at stops along the way.
https://www.transport.act.gov.au/travel-options/light-rail/network-planning

Jack D complaining about others not providing evidence for their stance on Light Rail.

Now I’ve seen it all.

Leon has made a factual comment around travel times Jack, if you think they are misleading, provide evidence as to why. The government’s own links suggest 30 mins as does any comparison with the current travel times for Stage 1.

Im still waiting for Jack to provide the business case for light rail Stage 2 that outlines all the benefits he claims exist, rather than his standard government issued talking points and meaningless motherhood statements.

Leon Arundell7:07 am 10 Aug 24

Light rail stage 2 will be slower than stage I, even though I overstated travel times. The Business Case for Stage 2A estimated a City to Woden travel time of 25-30 minutes, plus 2 to 2.5 minutes for wire-free operations. The biggest delay for Gunghahlin-to-Civic buses was a bottleneck at the intersection of Flemington Road and the Federal Highway. A short extension of the right hand turn lane would have fixed that bottleneck. My observations show that light rail services arrive on average a minute late. As for your claim of “less traffic and road congestion,” household travel surveys showed that daily car travel increased from 6.5 million kilometres in 2017 to 8.2 million km in 2022 and the 2021 census showed a record high proportion of commuters driving cars.

Here we go, hammered again by the RiotAct’s two most vocal opponents of light rail to produce evidence of its benefits. Their constant and one-sided criticisms are doing my head in, always using tired and worn out arguments but careful not to reveal how popular and successful the project is, and benefits for a growing population and work force.

Prior to the 2016 election the government released its full business case for stage 1 of the Gungahlin leg of the project. This detailed and 158-page document is publicly available on the government’s website.

The Stage 2A business case was released in 2019. This is the busiest leg of the project providing access to businesses, residences, entertainment precincts, ANU and major entertainment events at Commonwealth Park. This detailed 154 page report is also publicly available. Despite criticisms and delaying tactics from the opposition and its transport spokesperson Mark Parton, construction was approved by the federal government, through the NCA and is currently underway.

Contracts for stage 1 and 2a are also publicly available.

This year the government released its 5-year light rail progress report. This 66-page report is also publicly available.

Planning for Stage 2B of the project to Woden is still underway. This is the most complicated infrastructure project the government has ever undertaken. The business case will be released when finalised as one would expect.

The opposition is now taking us to our fourth light rail election with another bus only transport option. Their lack of commitment to the project and the recent revelations that their policy proposal can’t even make it down Commonwealth Avenue and its bridge is revealing. Mr Parton criticised the media at the time claiming it was a beat up and “a storm in a teacup”.

Jack,
That’s a lot of words to provide absolutely no information to support your claims.

The business case for the first stage of light rail showed a very poor return for such a project with over half the claimed benefits associated with land development, with very low transport benefits.

It’s the reason why no Stage of the project has been able to be included in Infrastructure Australia’s priority funding list because it doesn’t meet the objective funding criteria designed for these types of projects.

Stage 1 has a claimed cost benefit ratio of just over 1, on the easiest and most beneficial route in Canberra. As you yourself admit, future stages are significantly more challenging, with much lower benefits

And as the government’s own data shows, the patronage rates used in the business case for Stage 1 have not been met despite significantly higher population growth than expected. For something so “popular” it’s funny how the usage data doesn’t agree.

The published benefits realisation study ignores obvious failures of governance and provides little in the way of objective analysis.

The business case for Stage 2A, shows a significant loss in returns on investment and was savaged by the Auditor General for how poorly the government has prepared and managed the decision making.

“The business case will be released when finalised as one would expect.”

Sorry, but in reality, one would not expect a government to make a decision on such an enormous and costly project without completing a robust options study and business case first.

Thanks for admitting that the ACT government is making huge infrastructure decisions without doing their due diligence.

What you are demanding chewy is for the government to release a business case before doing any due diligence or planning. Stage 2, the most complex stage of the project, is currently in the planning processes and the route unknown. The federal parliament and ACT government have not completed their approval processes and the NCA, whose decisions are integral to the extension of light rail to Woden, has not granted any planning approvals.

The proposed route through the parliamentary triangle crosses some of our city’s most environmentally significant land and buildings belonging to the Commonwealth. The rail will traverse Commonwealth Avenue past the National Library, Lake Burley Griffin and Capital Hill, the most complex stage of the project.

The stage 1 light rail route is a success and popular with commuters. It has opened up business and created economic activity along the route. No amount of whining, nitpicking and undermining from you or anyone else will change that!

Jack,
That is completely incorrect.

I’m asking for them to do their due diligence before making the decision on committing to the project.

You actually agree with me in your own comment that the work currently hasn’t been done, yet you still support the project and the government’s decisions. Your own comment outlines that the supporting information to make an informed infrastructure investment decision is not currently available.

You also keep highlighting the complexity of future stages of light rail, which is exactly what calls its viability into question. The costs will be far higher than light rail Stage 1 and the benefits far less because the ACT Government owns less developable land along the route.

They haven’t even completed any options assessment for Stage 2 and beyond, which flies in the face of any sort of good infrastructure planning or economic management.

“The stage 1 light rail route is a success and popular with commuters.”

Popular by what metrics? As above, patronage is still well below the forecast 2021 numbers despite far higher than predicted population growth along the route. No matter how much you attempt to spin it, the hard facts are that it is not meeting its own government set performance metrics.

As for cresting economic activity along the route, the government’s own business case showed that the entire project barely returns the project expenditure with a cost benefit ratio of just over 1, including that increased economic activity.

The opportunity cost of using limited taxpayer funds for such a purpose is huge.
Particularly when a large part of the profits generated are private. It’s extremely inequitable.

It’s not nitpicking to point out the flaws in the project and the evidence as to why the government shouldn’t be wasting limited resources so outrageously at this time.

It’s simply outlining the facts over the emotional arguments being provided by light rail supporters.

Where pedestrians are at risk of being hit by cars we reduce the speed limit for the cars.

Presumably the same tactic would have similar results for issues with our light rail vehicles.

Reduce their speed limit.

Also throw some speed humps in stupid places for no actual benefit. Keep with the theme.

GrumpyGrandpa5:25 pm 31 Jul 24

Cross any railway line in country NSW and there are warning light, bells and boom gates.
Yet in Canberra, the ACT Government has believed it’s own hype, that education was all that was needed to make our LR crossings safe!

John Coleman7:54 pm 31 Jul 24

Those are railway lines however. In Melbourne or Sydney, as far as trams and light rail are concerned, education and being aware is pretty much all there is. And that’s fine.

1. There are many railways crossings that are unprotected in country NSW and indeed in the wider Australia.
2. Light rail lines in Sydney also use Traffic lights.
3. Warning lights, bells and boom gates are also not a full proof. We know this, because of the incidents that occur in other jurisdictions.

Education is all that’s required if people are willing to take it on-board. Check out my video posted below.

As for boom gates, can you imagine the out-cry if they were built along the route in Canberra? No, and not necessary for a tram going that slow (in comparison to a train) on infrastructure with signage which is so obvious.

The red light running is the issue. Most red light runners gamble on the fact that traffic in the other direction is proceeding from a standing start when their light turns green.

Light rail rarely if ever gets a green from a standing start. The LRV is almost always approaching a red light which turns green before it arrives at the stop line.

ChrisinTurner2:05 pm 31 Jul 24

Are the pedestrian signals now activated by an approaching LRV? For a long time pedestrians had to ignore a red. It was a design problem.

As a regular tram user the signals have never been a problem which pedestrians have had to ignore!

What absolute rubbish!

The study correctly identifies the issue with passengers having to cross busy roads. But the proposed solution ignores the blatant disregard of pedestrian signals by the majority of passengers /pedestrians and it’s proposed solution is likely to be ineffective.

All tram stops should have ground level access across roads blocked with under or overpasses built with provision with prams, wheelchairs, bicycles etc. This is going to be needed even more for future tram stages with tram stops in 80kph zones.

I’m constantly amazed when I see (or hear) about such accidents with the trams in Canberra. Such effort has gone into making the trams and their route safe for all, yet there’s still people who demonstrate a lack of peripheral awareness or simply feel they can compete with the tram. It only takes 30 more seconds of your life to wait…

To demonstrate my point, this is a video I took while visiting Leipzig (Germany) in 2023. Note how well trams CAN co-reside with pedestrians and drivers.
https://youtu.be/NPm9B2nnbNM

We really need to stop hindering natural selection. The tram is a hige bright red thing, on a set course. If you run into it, get run into by it or run over by it, it’s probably best that your genetic line be stopped right there. For the good of humanity.

Very well said Ken. It’ll also prevent the need for the adoption of another useless department charged with delivering sustainable outcomes on an hollistic level.

Margaret Freemantle11:25 pm 09 Aug 24

Living right at a team stop, I see many people crossing Northbourne Avenue anywhere close to them, rather than walk to lights. They have their heads down with earbuds and no regard for the tram or cars. I am with Ken!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.