Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Ask RiotACT

Buying or selling? Get the right advice

Renting and Open House days?

By Gantz 16 June 2011 29

Hi Rioters,

A subject I know has been presented most likely many times previously, I just spent a few hours searching but could not find anything, so here I go:

Recently the owner of our apartment passed away, leaving the place to her two sons. They have came and checked out the place previously, and assured us they would honour  our Rental Agreement and see it through till November when the lease is up.

The issue now is they wish to sell the place, which is fine, although they have now requested to take pictures, measurements and have Open Houses for prospective buyers on Saturday mornings.

We (My partner and I) believe we’re well within our rights to decline the requests, as we’d prefer to not have images of our belongings online for anyone to view, and believe we should not have to go through the continual hassles presented by having to vacate OUR home each Saturday morning.

I have attempted to contact the Tenants Union, with no luck. I hope you guys can help with some clarification.

What’re your thoughts on the issue?

Cheers!

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
29 Responses to
Renting and Open House days?
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Watson 1:46 pm 20 Jun 11

Clown Killer said :

There’s two “n’s” in chardonnay.

I wouldn’t know, because I can’t afford the stuff! Only kidding, I prefer Shiraz.

Clown Killer 1:31 pm 20 Jun 11

There’s two “n’s” in chardonnay.

Watson 1:12 pm 20 Jun 11

SheepGroper said :

The owner of the house is allowing you the use of an asset worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s only reasonable that they want it to remain in good condition, and regular inspections confirm that you’re treating their property correctly. You really think this is a bad thing?

And I really object to the “allowing you the use”. As if I don’t pay through the nose for the privilege? It’s not a bloody charity organisation!

I allow them the use of my hard earned rent dollars, probably paying off their mortgage for them so they can spend their money on lattes and chardonays. They should be bloody grateful for that and leave me alone!

Watson 12:58 pm 20 Jun 11

SheepGroper said :

Watson said :

It’s not about good or bad landlords at all. It’s about the culture of renting here. You are supposed to leave the property in exactly the state as when you moved in, allow regular inspections, etc. These are constant reminders that this is not your home and they can boot you out anytime. This is not the case in other countries I’ve lived in where you are allowed to act like the place is yours until you move out, obviously apart from trashing it. You still pay for any repairs for damage caused by you apart from normal wear and tear.

The owner of the house is allowing you the use of an asset worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s only reasonable that they want it to remain in good condition, and regular inspections confirm that you’re treating their property correctly. You really think this is a bad thing?

Look, all I was trying to say is that in other countries it is not regarded as necessary and noone is telling landlords they are idiots for not inspecting their properties. If tenants are going to trash a place, they’ll trash it, inspections or not. And even then it would be pretty hard and very rare for them to destroy the whole half a million asset before someone stops them. I don’t see how inspections prevent that at all.

What may seem totally logical to you – and obviously you think anyone who doesn’t agree is just deluded – is not logical for millions of landlords out there who happily keep renting out their properties.

SheepGroper 12:23 pm 20 Jun 11

Watson said :

It’s not about good or bad landlords at all. It’s about the culture of renting here. You are supposed to leave the property in exactly the state as when you moved in, allow regular inspections, etc. These are constant reminders that this is not your home and they can boot you out anytime. This is not the case in other countries I’ve lived in where you are allowed to act like the place is yours until you move out, obviously apart from trashing it. You still pay for any repairs for damage caused by you apart from normal wear and tear.

The owner of the house is allowing you the use of an asset worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s only reasonable that they want it to remain in good condition, and regular inspections confirm that you’re treating their property correctly. You really think this is a bad thing?

Kt01 11:22 am 20 Jun 11

I’ve been through this hell before. The property I was living in went on the market at the start of my 12 month lease and didn’t sell until well after we had vacated the property. 10 months of open houses and cleaning the house to inspection standard every week or 2nd week was a nightmare! Plus it got messy when we tried to get out of the lease and the owners were completely unreasonable.

You will have a hard time not having any open houses, but you can only agree to giving them a short window on whatever day you choose, possibly once a fortnight – Otherwise you give them grounds to call you unreasonable if your matter ever has to go tot rent tribunal. If you are really not keen on open houses, you can choose to give them access to show the property by appointment only, on a day of your choice. I have had confirmation from the Tenants Union that this isn’t unreasonable access.

You can also limit the pictures they show of the property, it is, after all, your things on display for the world to see. It’s an invasion of your privicay and you aren’t getting anything out of being understanding. You can actually refuse to have photos of the inside if you choose.

I would try as hard as possible to get out of the lease – this is not going to be a fun process for you, epically if the property doesn’t sell quickly.

madamcholet 12:03 pm 17 Jun 11

You can limit the photos they take. Most rental properties on allhomes have very few photos. With regards to the open house times – maybe do four or so and then draw a line if it looks like not being sold quickly. You could ask them to do open homes at times more suitable to you rather than just the agent.

Holden Caulfield 9:33 am 17 Jun 11

I-filed said :

I dropped in to an open day up the road out of curiosity and I was a bit confronted by the number of people the agent was letting through the house without supervision. The agent just hung around the front door…

Have you ever been to an open house at all before? That’s pretty much how they work, regardless of who owns or lives in the house.

You’re right, the possibility of petty theft is quite high, but if the agent did their job properly they would have asked you for a name and phone number. Not a foolproof security measure I admit, but the issue can’t be that bad or else there’d be a different system employed by agents across the board.

MissChief 10:10 pm 16 Jun 11

urchin said :

the tenant’s union site says that allowing inspection by appointments, but not open days, is a valid approach. less invasive and less risk of people lifting your belongings.

+1

It’s fair enough to say what’s reasonable to the landlord may not be reasonable to you. It might not be your house but it is your home. We rejected open houses outright due to the amount of valuable equipment we had in the house and security concerns. At least with inspection by appointment the identity of individuals is confirmed beforehand. Our insurance policy also made it clear that we would be liable for any loss resulting from any access we allowed.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site