Sydney Seaplanes estimates Lake to Harbour flight would cost about $300 one-way

Ian Bushnell 9 December 2020 15
Sydney Seaplanes

Only an hour away if Sydney Seaplanes are able to establish a Canberra service from Lake Burley Griffin. Photo: Sydney Seaplanes.

A seaplane trip to Sydney will cost about $300 each way, according to the owner and managing director of Sydney Seaplanes, which is seeking to run the Lake Burley Griffin service.

Aaron Shaw said he hoped to launch the one-hour service between Canberra and Rose Bay next spring, but at present the focus was on ticking the regulatory and technical boxes.

A demonstration flight will splash down on the lake to the west of the National Museum of Australia on Tuesday, and the National Capital Authority will likely open community consultation about the service in the new year.

Mr Shaw said the proposed Canberra connection was part of the company’s longer-term plans to extend transport services to coastal destinations north and south of Sydney. He foresaw Canberra passengers being able to hub through Rose Bay to destinations such as Newcastle.


READ ALSO: Sydney seaplane service proposed for Lake Burley Griffin


The company has returned to its Lake Burley Griffin plans after first floating the idea in 2007 but Mr Shaw believes there is a greater chance of success now.

”We’ve got a more forward-thinking and vibrant [NCA] board there now,” he said.

Mr Shaw approached the NCA in January and despite a difficult year for aviation, he believes there is a market for a faster more direct service into the centre of both cities.

Driving the idea was the prominent role of seaplanes in places such as Vancouver, Seattle, New York and Miami, cities where seaplanes are used primarily for transport services, more than for tourism or leisure.

”It was really noting the opportunity to leverage our Sydney Harbour-based airport, so people can get right in and close to the centre of Sydney, and the convenience that offers to travellers is huge compared to the hassle and crowds of a normal traditional airport,” he said.

Mr Shaw said 11 million people a year travel between Sydney and Canberra, and nine million of those were in cars.

”We believe a one hour service between the centres of both cities will entice a number of those people from their cars to a genuinely fast convenient aviation service,” he said.

Lake Burley Griffin

The demonstration flight will land in the western area of the Lake and tie up at the National Museum of Australia.

But Canberra Airport also plays a role in the proposal, as the amphibious planes carry landing gear in their floats and can land on tarmac as well.

Sydney Seaplanes plans to keep a plane at the Airport, and there would also be services from there to Rose Bay and back, as well as the Lake flights.

If the weather is bad or conditions on the Lake are unsuitable, the seaplanes can divert to the Airport.

Mr Shaw said the company may also offer more services to Canberra Airport from Rose Bay to minimise effects on the Lake.

He said the only infrastructure needed for the Lake would be a floating platform or pontoon attached to a dock.

There are docks on both sides of the Museum, which Mr Shaw says is very supportive of the idea.

A fuel trailer from the Airport would meet the plane and return there after refuelling.

Mr Shaw said the planes would have a minimal impact on the Lake, spending only five minutes per flight there, and observing maritime rules to give way to non-powered craft.

The company would be in communication with other lake users such as yacht or rowing clubs to be aware of events or significant traffic on the Lake.

Mr Shaw said it had coexisted comfortably for years with other water users in the busiest harbour in the Southern Hemisphere.

The company would be looking to forge tourism ties with the national institutions.

”What we do very well is packaged tours and products,” Mr Shaw said, ”and we want to be partnering with those national institutions and offering packages to Sydney market. Things like that that have huge popular appeal to the Sydney market.”

He said the service would not just be for the rich and famous or be unattainable, but something everyone could benefit from.

The proposal is likely to meet opposition from those worried about environmental damage such as fuel spills and heritage impacts, but Mr Shaw hoped they would also weigh up the benefits of being within an hour of Sydney Harbour and what the service could bring to Canberra.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
15 Responses to Sydney Seaplanes estimates Lake to Harbour flight would cost about $300 one-way
Margaret Ryan Margaret Ryan 9:19 pm 10 Dec 20

Speed boats are not allowed on lake,because of damage to the lakes built walls !How can planes landing(2 or 3 a day)and taking off be allowed just to make money

Nick Anderson Nick Anderson 5:44 pm 10 Dec 20

Considering that this is Canberra, there will (probably) be an additional landing fee, passenger charge, outdoor security checkpoint, carbon offset levy, environmental impact compensation, and x-ray machines on the jetty. And that’s before you even step foot on the plane.

Granted, some of the above might be exaggerated but not by much. Call me a skeptic but i have a few questions about the feasibility.

    Nick Anderson Nick Anderson 5:49 pm 10 Dec 20

    Oh, I almost forgot: I suppose the seaplane would have to navigate around restricted airspace surrounding Government house or Parliament? Wouldn’t want to pose a risk to national security.

    David Perkins David Perkins 6:09 pm 10 Dec 20

    Nick Anderson and avoid small boats, rowers and kayaks.

    Jolanta N-m Jolanta N-m 6:42 am 16 Dec 20

    Oh you negative Nellie or in this case Nick.

    Nick Anderson Nick Anderson 2:28 pm 16 Dec 20

    Jolanta N-m What can I say, I’m a realist. Still optimistic though 💁‍♂️

Acton Acton 6:19 am 10 Dec 20

The map shows the seaplane company plans to land and takeoff in a zone right in front of the Canberra Yacht Club, where regattas and kids sailing courses are run. The proposal is dangerous, selfish, provocative and impractical. Lake George would be better for a seaplane.

    ssek ssek 8:05 am 10 Dec 20

    The yacht club are not the exclusive owners of the lake. Talk about selfish.

    Acton Acton 3:57 pm 10 Dec 20

    The seaplane company is acting in an entirely selfish manner when it expects the CYC, other clubs and all users of LBG (yachts, paddle-boards, wind-surfers, rowing boats, kayaks, canoes, even swimmers….) to immediately vacate the vicinity of the lake on the approach of a seaplane.
    LBG is a public recreational area, not a zone for private commercial aviation activity.
    Definition of ‘Selfish’:
    “concerned excessively or exclusively with oneself : seeking or concentrating on one’s own advantage, pleasure, or well-being without regard for others”
    Go to Lake George instead.

    ssek ssek 9:42 am 11 Dec 20

    Again, the yacht club, windsurfers and kayakers do not have any right to exclusive ise of the lake. They are a tiny minority of people who want to use the lake. The rest are excluded, like people who would like to use powerboats. Considering the ACT has over 30 thousand registered boat trailers, I’d say they outweigh yacht club members.

    It’s tiresome hearing people with a complete lack of self awareness whine about selfishness.

Jeremy Jeremy Jeremy Jeremy 9:53 pm 09 Dec 20

I’d pay it. Cheaper than Qantas haha

Marc Edwards Marc Edwards 6:21 pm 09 Dec 20

Considering there proposing to land and take off in the western end, how will this effect the main users of this part the sailing clubs, and general sailors

    Martin Budden Martin Budden 6:45 pm 09 Dec 20

    Marc Edwards same as the other waterways the seaplanes already use: the planes just go around the boats. There's plenty of room.

Suzanne Milne Suzanne Milne 6:08 pm 09 Dec 20

great we'll be there

Capital Retro Capital Retro 4:39 pm 09 Dec 20

On the other thread about this proposal someone posted that the aircraft to be used was unpressurised and was exposed to turbulence. There are people who wouldn’t handle this well in a light plane so there would have to be lots of barf-bags and a toilet available.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site