21 July 2006

Tent embassy fires deliberately lit - coroner

| johnboy
Join the conversation
22

In 2004 there were some suspicions that the fires plaguing the Aboriginal Tent Embassy could have been the result of poor camp discipline.

The ABC now reports that Coroner Ron Cahill has decided that arson was the cause of the fires. Sadly there are no ideas about either motive or who might have done it.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

As I understand it, the Police are unable to dismantle it as a result of it being under the control of the National Capital Planning Authority – I could be wrong.

I don’t support it. Those who now reside there are an irrelevant eyesore that need to be moved on. Sooner the better.

ps – the above comment should not be taken as an indication that I don’t support the existence of the tent embassy

Re squatters’ rights (‘adverse possession’)
No adverse possession in the ACT, I’m afraid (s69 Land Titles Act 1925 (ACT)).

And before anyone else gets the bright idea, I’m pretty sure Native Title would have been extinguished on the site. But anyone who knows better feel free to correct me.

Evee, join Jessica Rowe as having been boned. And now she is preggos.

I dont know if many of you realise this, but there have been (on and off) a number of non-indigenous people living on the site. Being someone of indigenous decent, I am conflicted with the issue of it being an embassy/eyesore. I agree that the mentality of how and why it was set up all those years ago, but it has strayed very far from that. To be quite frank, the only times I have ever had cause to visit there was during my time working for child protection.
Expecting the bone to be pointed at me any moment now!!

What I love about the word “embassy” that the blacks use, is that it implies they are not in their own country. Go figure.

barking toad4:26 pm 21 Jul 06

Please stop calling it an embassy.

That’s the name some activists gave there little camp decades ago

What’s there now doesn’t represent what was established by those activists whether you agree with their original protest or not.

What’s there now is nothing more than a illegal camping ground for transient bludgers who descend on Canberra because they know they can play the race card when necessary and the authorities are too soft to do anything about it.

I like the makeshift leanto plunked unassailably in the middle of the architectural pomp.

It appeals to my sense of… something. ‘Being a little shit’ I suppose.

What happened to the tent embassy in Melbourne?

I recall that a similar stunt was tried in Adelaide about 10 years ago. The police had no trouble in putting the bull dozers through the site.

The tent embassy traditionally thins out during winter and gets pretty expansive during summer. For rather obvious, weather-related reasons. It’s much more comfortable to protest when you’re not going to freeze to death on the lawn…

In my opinion it doesn’t support their cause; just makes them look like a bunch of tossers with chips on their shoulders.

D9 the whole place!

I’ll probably get flamed here, but stuff it. I think the Aboriginal tent embassy is a national disgrace. If they want to play this game, then they can play by the same rules as the rest of us. Why don’t they get themselves a proper building, and get themselves on the tourist attraction map to show the world about their culture and plight? The Victorians have got the right idea: douse the fires and put canturf straight over the top. I just don’t see how having a shack and a few campfires around the place supports their cause.

Thumper – I was pondering on just why the tent residence was thinning in numbers. I thought it may have had something to do with the required ‘clean up’ in preparation for the next phase of development into a ‘recognised’ embassy with education programs delivered by representatives…of course, my oversight was that it was a touch too cold for the so called committed was an oversight.

Maybe the Israelis can be convinced to help remove this ’embassy’ from Canberra?

I’m sure I’ve seen some Muslim terrorists down there……..

Sort of like weeds in bushland … needs a controlled burn every now and then.

Anyone else notice how it’s s p r e a d i n g? What was an small ‘Embassy’ is now a small ‘compound’ and will soon be a small enclave but the gutless Pollies won’t act….

Unfortunately, or fortunately, the legal systems prefers to operate on the basis of investigations and findings of fact, rather than what “any idiot” tells you.

Stir the pot time….

What I love is: “…result of poor camp discipline”

I didn’t realise that I could pitch a tent and camp there as well 🙂

Wonder how far I would get before some sort of Govt official (police or parks ranger?) asked me to move along – be it in front of old parliament house, next to the High Court or somewhere along the lake….

barking toad11:11 am 21 Jul 06

I’ve always been disappointed that the town hoons haven’t torched this tip on a regular basis.

What’s wrong wiv the yoof of today!!

Thanks jb.. I couldn’t conceive how they would but by using this misnomer, the suggestion that that are or they have “extra” rights is being validated.

They have an unrecognized claim to sovereignty over “ever inch” of Australia.

No formal recognition at all, but after all these years they’d have to have some sort of claim to squatter’s rights.

Out of curiosity, does that place have legal “embassy” status or has it just been labelled that for the last upteen decades ?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.