Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Your convenient chemist with the biggest range of Beanie Boo’s in CBR

Unprovoked attack left gaping wound in greyhound’s side

By Ian Bushnell - 5 February 2018 32

Warning: This article includes images that may cause distress to some readers.

Sophy Hart and her seven-year-old greyhound Charlie: “He’s very gentle.” Photos: Supplied.

Sophy Hart’s traumatised seven-year-old greyhound Charlie is nursing a wound that required at least 10 stitches after being attacked in her Scullin street by a male, tan pit-bull type animal running free in the neighbourhood.

Sophy, Charlie and her two other dogs, small white Maltese terrier types, only got as far as two doors down in Kauper Street on their morning walk last Thursday (1 February) about 10 am before the collared and tagged tan dog ran across the street and went for Charlie.

“They were all in a ball in a mess. I was yelling at them to stop. Once they stopped, my dogs’ leads was tangled in the other dog’s feet so I unhooked Charlie’s lead so he could get away,” the 28-year-Australian Protective Service officer said.

“He ran back home and cowered up at the front door. He went home and the other dog followed. He was trying to get inside the yard and have another go.”

Back inside the house, Sophy was shocked to see a gaping 10-15 centimetre wound on her greyhound’s right side.

The wound inflicted on Charlie during the attack.

Realising he needed immediate veterinary attention, she prepared to leave but the attacker was still outside.

So she called the police who then called Domestic Animal Services (DAS) on her behalf. Knowing she would require proof, Sophy went round to the side of the house to take photographs of the animal, who met her at the gate.

Sophy then waited for DAS to show up but with Charlie shaking and panting. She was worried about him going into shock.

When the attacker disappeared she took the opportunity to get him to the vet, where he was admitted for the day and underwent surgery.

When she rang DAS at midday, she was relieved to find that the attacker had been seized after someone else had reported it.

On her return to the vet that afternoon, Sophy learned that another dog had been brought in with an attack wound and after cross-checking photos, confirmed that the culprit was the same tan dog.

Charlie needed surgery and stitches.

But this time the owners had been able to tie up the attacker so DAS could collect it.

It appears this dog was a serial offender with six dogs reportedly attacked in the Scullin area.

“Why does it attack other dogs and why is it running free?” Sophy asked.

The initial vet’s appointment cost Sophy $850 and there will be follow-up appointments during the recovery process but she is more worried about the trauma and its ongoing effects on Charlie.

“He’s been attacked a few times, which isn’t fair on him, mainly because he’s a larger dog and other dogs see him as a threat,” she said. “He gets quite scared of other dogs he hasn’t met before now and stays close for protection.”

DAS said investigations were ongoing.

The Legislative Assembly passed new dangerous dog laws last November in the wake of the death of a Watson woman.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
32 Responses to
Unprovoked attack left gaping wound in greyhound’s side
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Andrew Gooch 6:34 pm 09 Feb 18

My beautiful Staffy after meeting this same dog in Scullin.

I Agree that it’s not the breed, it’s the owners. Having a big dog like this is a huge responsibility and not one that can be taken lightly.

    Dana Phillips 1:01 am 10 Feb 18

    That’s terrible Gooch! Hope your dog makes a full recovery, ive had staffys there lovely dogs!!

Sue Colwell 7:50 pm 08 Feb 18

This is disgusting! My dog was attacked with punctures in the neck. Act gov did nothing!

HiddenDragon 5:40 pm 07 Feb 18

The double standards about powerfully-built, potentially aggressive dogs in this town are amazing.

Many (perhaps not all) of the people who are busily temporising and down-playing the risks presented by these animals would be horrified and outraged (quite rightly) at any suggestion that there should be a watering down of the gun laws, and yet they see no problem whatsoever in allowing four-legged weapons (with minds and instincts of their own, unlike guns) to roam our suburbs without penalty – unless death or serious injury results.

The NRA clearly has antipodean canine-fancying soul-mates.

A_Cog 4:17 pm 07 Feb 18

Grimm said: “Has nothing to do with the breed of dog. Yet again this nonsense is trotted out by people with no idea.”

Sorry Grimm, but the data disagrees:

Councils report dog attacks in NSW. Go to the middle of the 2011 report (tables 10 and 11)where the proportions of attacks are (not the raw numbers). The top dogs are the usual suspects, shown by the “rate of attack per 100”

I like this bit too: “the rate of attack for desexed dogs is almost 4.8 times lower than the rate of attack for dogs that are not desexed.”

It is ALL breed, and males are worse. They’ve been bred for violence. At the very least, make desexing of dangerous breeds a requirement with massive fines for breaches.

At best we should ban ’em entirely

    Grimm 6:08 pm 08 Feb 18

    And the data is heavily flawed, because probably 90% of what is considered a dog attack is never reported.

    But yeah, ban dogs….

Melinda Parrett 3:45 pm 07 Feb 18

Where is the government in all of this. Standing by at a time it should be responding urgently to this epidemic. Shame on you government. You are Doing nothing about owners who have their dogs loose. It’s not the dogs fault!! It’s the owners!!!!!!!!!!

Ian 10:20 pm 06 Feb 18

The owner of the attacking dog should have the decency to pay up for the vet bills. But if not should be forced to by DAS without a process taking years to extract the money.

In this case, where it appears to be a serial offender, it should be removed from its owner and euthanased (Ideally so should the owner). Unfortunately many people who like to have a large intimidating dog are exactly the type of people who shouldn’t be allowed to have a large intimidating dog.

Trudy Anderson 8:31 pm 06 Feb 18

Another week another dog attack. Fine the offending owner and get them to pay all vet bills for the injured animal and a dollar amount in compensation to the owner of the injured greyhound to say sorry. It’s abt time dog owners started taking responsibility for their dogs actions!

Zara Kivell 12:44 pm 06 Feb 18

Sincere sympathy to Charlie, his owner and her two other little dogs. How terribly traumatic.
It scares me when off-lead dogs come running up to me and my Greyhound when we are out walking. My Greyhound is muzzled and on a short lead.
I now carry pepper spray for my own personal protection, and would not hesitate to use it on a dog attacking me or mine.

Grimm 11:25 am 06 Feb 18

Has nothing to do with the breed of dog. Yet again this nonsense is trotted out by people with no idea.

I have Bull Arabs, which people would call pit bulls. They are very well trained hunting dogs. They chase and catch pigs, when they are geared up. Any other time they chase nothing. Never show any aggression towards people or other dogs. They will however harass you to death for a scratch on the head. This is the case with all the other people I know with these type of dogs that are responsible owners.

Yeah, they are capable of inflicting a lot of damage, but so is any other large dog. The difference is training and socialisation, and the fault lays squarely on the owner, not the breed of dog. When walking mine I see people with all kinds of large dogs growling and carrying on at my dogs, while mine show no interest at all.

Some dogs are just aggressive and it’s almost impossible to get it out of them, and those go for a walk up the paddock and don’t come back. Fairly rare, but it happens. If you have large dogs and don’t socialise them very early on, you shouldn’t have dogs. If they are aggressive and you can’t/won’t/don’t know how to train it out or aren’t willing to put it down for that, don’t own large dogs. Common sense, really.

Alice Leda Shornwoolly Lamb 7:32 am 06 Feb 18

I saw a pit bull grab hold of an Irish wolfhound at a crowded New Year’s Eve event in Vic . Both dogs were on the leash. About 6 people were thumping the dog to make it release hold of the wolfhound , without success. My partner dashed up and gave it a kick to the base of its jaw and it released immediately. It was then wagging its tail while the other dog was yelping. Such dogs do not belong in public places at all, ever, they are akin to carrying a weapon

Margaret Gracie 6:55 am 06 Feb 18

It may be a sad situation where the dog has been used in dog fights. The owner of the dog should have the animal taken away and banned from ever owning pets. I feel very sorry for all the dogs who have suffered because of this roaming dog. But if you can't report the actual breed of the offending dog, don't assume it;s a "pit bull" type dog. That is just feeding into an unnecessary fear of a breed.

Dave Phillips 2:07 am 06 Feb 18

This is ridiculous and out of hand. Rangers and other council staff should be rounding these dogs up on the very first call to bring it to their attention. Dogs that have genuinely gotten out and are ok can be picked up from the pound, but any dog that has already attacked another dog or worse still a human should be put to sleep. Not after 7 days or whatever, but as soon as they are caught.

Narrelle Miners 11:30 pm 05 Feb 18

Poor Charlie, hope you get well soon. Such a gentle soul,

Donna Venables 10:48 pm 05 Feb 18

The owner of the attack dog should pay all the vet bills for all the pets his dog has attacked.

Kylie Apps 10:34 pm 05 Feb 18

Donna!! This is why I don’t walk them!

Peter McArdle 10:33 pm 05 Feb 18

Prosecute the owner of the pit bull who lets it run free. Meanwhile, ask the gentleman with the cricket bat to visit the Northside.

Why would anyone have a pit bull?

They are bred to attack and kill other dogs.

They should be banned.

If not, then please justify why not.

    Andrew Pennington 5:43 pm 06 Feb 18

    Hi Peter, I understand your frustration. However after rescuing a pit bull, we also thought they were dangerous , we really can’t fault her behavior. We have socialized her and taken her to obedience training and she has even been attacked without fighting back. She meets many dogs regularly and our miniature dachshund is the boss of her. These breeds are dangerous in the wrong hands, maybe no more so than any breed and unfortunately tend to attract a type ( generalizing there) however, it all comes down to the owner and socialization. So many people don’t realize it is all about ongoing socialization. The breed was once called a nanny dog as they are so gentle and naturing. It’s such a shame people blame the breed and not the owners. Humans have a lot to answer for unfortunately...

    Peter McArdle 7:23 pm 06 Feb 18

    Andrew Pennington I basically agree with you. Unfortunately the macho posture of many owners (presumably not you) has led to many pit bulls becoming vicious. Cheers.

    Lorraine Butcher 6:47 am 07 Feb 18

    I know you love your dog, but please stop spreading the myth of the nanny dog. They were never nanny dogs. They were originally bred for bull baiting I believe, and then for dog fighting. Genetics matter incidentally so all the socialization in the world wont make a hunting dog into a herding dog. Just saying. Best of luck with your dog

John Perkins 10:10 pm 05 Feb 18

Another dog attack. I'm just so fed up with irresponsible dog owners. They should be banned for life from ever owning a dog.

Lexie Donald 10:08 pm 05 Feb 18

Its not off leash. Its roaming. And unsocislised. And aggressive. Needs euthanasing.

Cristal Jones 9:40 pm 05 Feb 18

Tiina - just around the corner from me 😬

Lauren Ashley 9:39 pm 05 Feb 18

Graeme Belinda this makes me so angry

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site