14 December 2022

Drugs found in half of all drivers involved in fatal crashes this year

| Lottie Twyford
Join the conversation
26
Police cars during road safety operation on Monaro Highway

Drugs and driving are “wicked problems” that no jurisdiction has yet solved. Photo: ACT Policing.

After a horror year on the Territory’s roads, data from ACT Policing has revealed a high percentage of drivers involved in fatal accidents had drugs in their system.

Of the drivers who could be tested, 70 per cent had cannabis in their system while 50 per cent had both cannabis and alcohol or methamphetamine (also referred to as methylamphetamine).

When taking into account those who were not tested, just under 50 per cent of all drivers had drugs detected.

READ ALSO Light rail-related construction disruptions to blame for reduced bus services next year

Police data provided in response to a question on notice taken as part of the ACT Legislative Assembly inquiry into dangerous driving confirmed 15 separate fatal crashes in the year to November resulting in 18 deaths.

Police have so far been able to run toxicity tests on 10 of the 15 drivers involved in these incidents, including those who died.

Seven of these had marijuana in their system and five had not only marijuana but also methamphetamine or alcohol as well.

Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan

Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan has urged Canberrans to drive responsibly. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

While police have publicly confirmed they believe alcohol and/or drugs played a role in most crashes, this has yet to be confirmed by coronial inquiries in most cases.

Police have previously stated their concern that drug decriminalisation could lead to community perception that driving under the influence of drugs is acceptable.

ACT Policing Operations Commander Linda Champion said it was frustrating for police when people “blatantly disregarded” road rules and road safety and drove under the influence of drugs.

“While there are legislative changes pending regarding the possession of small amounts of certain drugs, it remains illegal to drive a motor vehicle with any illicit substances in your system,” she said.

“Importantly – the presence of illicit drugs, including cannabis, methylamphetamine and cocaine in any driver’s blood or saliva remains an offence.

“We know there are road users who believe they can take medicinal or recreational cannabis and then later drive a vehicle. This is not the case. For as long as the substance is in your system, it is an offence to drive.”

READ ALSO This Canberra triathlon legend pretended to join the national games to escape Yugoslavia

In the last three financial years, the number of fatalities that involved a driver with cannabis or other drugs in their system has increased from three in 2019-20 to four in 2020-21 and eight in 2021-22.

Laws that decriminalised small amounts of cannabis came into effect in the Territory in 2020. A further swathe of drug decriminalisation laws for substances like ice, meth and cocaine will come into effect next year.

Labor backbencher Michael Pettersson has been behind the drug decriminalisation push.

He described the issues relating to drugs and driving as “wicked problems”.

Michael Pettersson in the Legislative Assembly

Labor backbencher Michael Pettersson introduced both sets of drug decriminalisation laws to the ACT Legislative Assembly. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Mr Pettersson stressed that driving under the influence was entirely different from possessing small amounts of drugs and that driving while affected by any substance was “remarkably dangerous”.

“The response from the state needs to be [criminal sanctions] for drug driving … it’s the only response to take,” Mr Pettersson told Region.

“For a person caught possessing the substance not behind a wheel, the response needs to be a health-based one to reduce the harms they may potentially cause to others.”

But Mr Pettersson described these issues as “wicked problems” which neither he nor technology had the answer for yet.

“I’m very sympathetic to the argument that someone was not impaired on the road, but they had the presence of these substances in their system,” he said.

“It’s a terrible situation, but in keeping our roads safe, we have to be overly punitive.”

READ ALSO ‘My life has been forever altered’: Ex-union secretary details impact of unsupported allegations

He said some of the complexity of drug testing and impairment was that each substance had different effects.

“To use cannabis as an example, we know that remains in drivers’ systems for a very long time, long after you’re impaired,” he said.

“Our drug detection system relies on detection, not impairment. There is potentially a very real issue there because people on our roads could face serious drug charges if they are not actually impaired.

“But for other substances, like cocaine, there’s a higher likelihood that if drug tests can detect it, you’re impaired by it.”

READ ALSO Ainslie man Angus Gottaas-Hughes admits sexually abusing victim

A spokesperson for the ACT Government said the ACT has a zero-tolerance approach to drug driving which means a driver cannot have any amount of a drug in their system at any time.

This is unlike the approach taken to alcohol where there is a prescribed acceptable limit.

This is despite the fact sometimes drivers have had drugs detected in their system when they have not consumed the substance for a number of days.

No technological developments have yet been able to establish a causal link between specific levels of drugs and impairment, which can be applied across the population, the ACT Government spokesperson said.

The government would continue to monitor this space, the spokesperson confirmed.

Join the conversation

26
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Frankly, I do not see a difficult issue here. We live in a risk based society. You take/consumers substances known to affect the way you respond to inputs, means you change how you will operate a car. Simple, you need to choose between you recreational drug of choice and driving. Risk to other road and path users is too great. We have supplied the Tram. Use it.

Capital Retro10:27 am 18 Dec 22

Can’t find the tram stops in Tuggers. Can you advise?

Stay home and detox?

I can’t recall the last time I saw a large RBT/MDT setup in Canberra. Maybe once in the 24 years I have lived here.

William Newby8:21 am 16 Dec 22

If only the Labor/Greens put as much priority on enforcing crime and keeping us all safe!
Instead they choose to focus on themes such as allowing people to freely carry more than enough drugs for personal consumption.
We already are Australias drug capital, of course this will lead to more drug related road deaths.

Scott Anthony12:02 am 16 Dec 22

Blind Freddy knows that a soft on drugs policy encouraged MORE drug use, more criminal activity, more drug violence (even murder) and more road fatalities…. its not a health issue, its a criminal issue… The ‘war on drugs’ is what keeps these fatalities under some degree of control… removing these laws just makes it worse…. as humans we should be smart enough to know this but the ‘super educated’ university fools think they know better from their rarefied air of their crystal towers…. here in the real world, people know better..

Capital Retro5:53 pm 15 Dec 22

Random drug testing of all ACT politicians should now apply and those found with drugs should be expelled permanently.

If power going to their heads is a drug, then that will be all of them

These drug driving laws really are ridiculous.

They rely solely on tests that USYD have proven to be ineffective and give police zero disgression to evaluate someones level of impairment. Not to mention they cost $40 a pop, are a massive inconvenience to drivers (due to the 10 minute test time) and waste the time of police where they could be doing important work.

Given the lack of efficacy of these tests, it seems they are more about stripping away the right to move freely from people who use drugs recreationally, as shown in this lovely piece of corny media produced by AFP:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUhZhEsoshA

Can we stick to catching actual criminals please?

https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2019/09/12/study-casts-doubt-on-accuracy-of-mobile-drug-testing-devices-.html

I would argue that those who drive under the influence are real criminals, and their suppliers are even worse. Maybe offer incentives to “dob in a dealer” and see how long before Cracky McGee seeks out his $500.

Well there are drug drivers and drunk drivers. Yes they are criminals but how do governments tackle these issues without them becoming wicked problems. People spend their lives researching, investigating and tackling wicked problems. Can’t say I’m familiar with Cracky McGee though or his $500. Call me old fashioned!

Yep – let’s decriminalise drugs 😳

Decriminalisation is fine, but the ACT govt needs to enfore driving rules around them. The issue is that it costs too much to run RDT’s, but it is 100% what is needed. Rules without enforcement is worthless.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.