12 June 2024

Davidson: Decriminalising possession of prescription drugs 'the next logical step' for expansion of law

| Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
9
pile of medications and pills

The ACT Greens are looking at illicit possession of prescription drugs as the next step for expanding decriminalisation in the Territory. Photo: Pharmacy Facebook.

Possessing a prescribed drug without a script is currently a crime in the ACT, but this is something that could change in the next four years.

The Territory has already decriminalised possession of small amounts of illicit drugs – first, it was cannabis in 2019 and, more recently, drugs such as cocaine, meth and heroin.

ACT Greens health spokesperson Emma Davidson has turned her mind to what she described as the “next logical step” for the law: decriminalising personal possession of prescription medications without a script.

“Any substance – medicines used without a prescription or illicit drugs – might be used recreationally or to self-medicate,” she said.

“For any reason that these substances are being used, it should be a health issue, not a criminal issue.”

Ms Davidson has specifically been looking at what are known as ‘schedule four substances’ that require a doctor’s script to access and are usually located behind the counter at a pharmacy.

Prescription drugs that fall under this category include methadone, ketamine, oxycodone, fentanyl and some ADHD medications.

Currently, possessing one gram of heroin in the ACT carries no criminal offence, but carrying a substance such as ketamine or methadone without a prescription could see a person receive a maximum $32,000 fine, two years imprisonment, or both.

“This unacceptable inconsistency needs to change,” Ms Davidson said.

“Harm reduction saves lives; criminalisation undermines harm reduction.”

READ ALSO Babies included in midwife-to-patient ratios in upcoming ACT Budget

There is evidence people are using medicines without a prescription in the community.

CanTEST’s monthly summaries show medications such as ketamine and fentanyl are being brought into Canberra’s fixed pill testing site.

Its recent report for 21 March to 20 April showed that 26 samples that were meant to be ketamine were submitted to the facility during that time frame.

The expected drug turned up in 21 of those samples with purities ranging from 30 to 87 per cent.

Other drugs detected instead of the expected ketamine included diphenhydramine (an antihistamine and sedative) and a relatively new and unstudied recreational designer drug, which was detected for the first time in Australia by CanTEST in 2022.

Prescription drugs bought on the black market carry the risk of not containing what’s expected, as it is from an unregulated source.

Ms Davidson said the fact people were presenting illicitly bought prescription drugs to CanTEST showed they wanted to have health-related conversations about their addiction to or reliance upon such medications.

“Nobody goes out wanting to get an addiction to [for example] methadone or ketamine … but some people find themselves in this circumstance,” she said.

“Some people choosing to access these things without a proper prescription do have real health-focused needs they’re trying to meet … but the system’s clearly not enabling them to meet that need.

“We want someone in this situation to be able to have a conversation with someone focused on their health … rather than worrying about shame, being stigmatised or fearing a criminal penalty.”

READ ALSO Advocates say new ACT euthanasia laws will stop patients from dying alone

Ms Davidson said this was a position that her party was “absolutely committed” to but that the current government wasn’t considering it at the moment.

She hopes this is something she could bring forward as a bill in the next term of the Assembly.

“Our job is not over.”

Join the conversation

9
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

This article is misleading. In the first few lines the article states ‘possession of a drug without a script is currently a crime in the ACT’. I do not believe this to be true.
Why would the focus be on schedule 4 medications? These medications are restricted, as opposed to controlled (S8)S8 medications are clearly marked as ‘controlled’ and ‘possession without prescription illegal’. I’ve never seen this marked on S4 medications.

I just wish that something was done about injecting drug users discarding their used syringes etc in public places. Two weeks ago I found a fit pack near the Coolamon Court playground and today a full sharps container in the car park.

Incidental Tourist9:30 pm 13 Jun 24

I guess the next step for Greens is to teach kids at school how to “safely” take drugs?

Has any other jurisdiction tried this, and how did it work out? Can the local Greens point to some examples?

More drugged up driving deaths killing innocent people on the road.

It’s a choice to take drugs and illegal substances, it’s not a choice when your a victim of others crimes while on drugs.

Our law system favors the innocent, our drug laws favor the guilty.

The other side often says if you are hard on drugs people will OD. Seems like a far off example. If we went harder on drugs it wouldn’t be a problem, they wouldn’t have the drugs to OD.

GrumpyGrandpa7:46 pm 12 Jun 24

In the next 4 years (after the 2024 election), the Greens want to decriminalise the illegal possession of prescription drugs!

How would it be safe for the community if people had unauthorised possession of pharmaceuticals that could cause sedation or drowiness?

Yeah, I’m not seeing a reason to vote Greens.

Alcohol causes sedation and drowsiness, and it’s legal. What’s the difference?

GrumpyGrandpa7:18 pm 13 Jun 24

Across the counter medicines can be abused and potentially cause death, which is why there are limits on supply of some of what are otherwise seen as “safe” medications.

Prescription medicines are restricted by the TPA and can only issued by doctors, which in itself, should be a good enough reason to oppose the brainfart of an idea from the Greens.

Alcohol is legal and yes, it’s too can cause sedation, if taken in sufficient quantities. It can abused, and is a problem in our society. The police & our courts enforce laws regarding alcohol.

The difference as I see it is that under the Greens’ proposal, we are talking about people taking tablets that weren’t prescribed for them, possibly without any knowledge of their purpose, or the risks associated with them.

Wasn’t it the nonce in the greens party that was pushing this ridiculous wheelbarrow?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.