Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Canberra Confidential. A review

By johnboy - 14 March 2013 32

screenshot

Canberra Confidential screened on the ABC tonight and you can watch it via that link or soon enough on iview.

For the purposes of disclosure I should note I got a Burmese curry out of it to share my ideas on stories they could include, and I was invited to a preview screening at the National Museum last week but had other things to do. While I doubt she remembers my name; over a decade ago Annabel Crabb and I used to sneak out of our press gallery offices and find ourselves at the same press conferences of visiting world leaders that it appeared no one else in the Canberra Gallery could take the time out of party gossip to make it to. (I once ended up asking Mikhail Gorbachev questions due to being one of very few non-cameraman or sound techs in the room).

After the preview screening last week the ruling elites of Canberra took to Twitter to howl they had once again been done down by cliche.

It’s true that if you’re a very keen student of local and Australian politicial history there’s not much new in there.

As well they used some really flimsy material early to smear conservative leaders, to balance the weightier Labor scandals.

But while those who walk the corridors of power will be on nodding terms with these scandals the rest of the population probably will come at it for the first time.

Which is no bad thing.

Annabel does come across as far too twee at times. But she is a journalist and not an actress.

And the conclusions that Canberra is becoming a fortress of secrets, because that’s what Australia wants us to be, bears some thinking about.

(Also the establishing shots of the landscape are really nicely done and show off what little remains of the Griffin legacy use of the landscape)

Well worth a watch.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments
32 Responses to
Canberra Confidential. A review
1
poetix 10:01 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Mikhail Gorbachev, not Michael. And that’s a shocking story; that so very few people turned up to interview him.

Report this comment

2
dpm 10:36 pm
14 Mar 13
#

poetix said :

Mikhail Gorbachev, not Michael. And that’s a shocking story; that so very few people turned up to interview him.

I like how your corrections always include an additional ‘value add’ comment or two to the thread! So much nicer than your standard grammar/spelling nazi! :-)

Report this comment

3
Masquara 10:51 pm
14 Mar 13
#

Really enjoyed tonight’s episode having come in a little way in so I’m not sure whether it was the first. Annabel seemed drained though – I think she was pregnant during the filming, so maybe it was early pregnancy. Loved the footage of kids rolling down the side of APH. So sad that that vital symbolism has been lost – what exactly is the security risk of having the people walk over the building, if they are allowed to walk half way up?

Report this comment

4
Holditz 10:57 pm
14 Mar 13
#

I’m hoping that’s not the only doco about Canberra in this centennial year. As much as we locals think Canberra is a great city, there’s not much telling people in the rest of the country, other than a plaintive “please like us!” A decent doco that talks about the birth and life of the city would be nice.

Report this comment

5
poetix 10:57 pm
14 Mar 13
#

dpm said :

poetix said :

Mikhail Gorbachev, not Michael. And that’s a shocking story; that so very few people turned up to interview him.

I like how your corrections always include an additional ‘value add’ comment or two to the thread! So much nicer than your standard grammar/spelling nazi! :-)

I love how your comments are invariably positive in some way, even when pointing out a problem or foible!

Mine contain the added extra so that after JB corrects, people don’t just think ‘God she’s an idiot, he spelt it right all along.’ They may think ‘Mmm, perhaps there was a fault here which has been corrected after our esteemed editor gave due weight to the thoughtful comment of another Rioter. For someone who makes such a telling comment would surely not be such a klutz as to wrongly identify a mistake?’

Pathetic. But we all have our hobbies.

Report this comment

6
EvanJames 11:18 pm
14 Mar 13
#

I found it quite interesting actually, I remember the Coombs thing, very vaguely, so it was good to get the whole thing, with old pollies and journos being interviewed for their versions… it was good. Not sure what all the complaining was about. Good TV.

Report this comment

7
Madam Cholet 8:37 am
15 Mar 13
#

I found it interesting being not an original Canberran or Australian, but I thought that it was negative in general about Canberra – boring grey streets etc etc. I know it wasn’t meant to be a ‘why we think it’s wonderful here’, but hell, there is more to life here than ASIO.

It made out we all have to get around constantly watching our backs.

I note that the credits had some kind of ACT logo on it – so must have had some funding from the locals. Would have thought they could have made sure it was positive at least.

Report this comment

8
devils_advocate 9:05 am
15 Mar 13
#

poetix said :

Mikhail Gorbachev, not Michael. And that’s a shocking story; that so very few people turned up to interview him.

No, the spelling would be closer to ??????. As far as attempts go to put a phonetic translation into roman letters, Mikhail and Michael are roughly equivalent.

Report this comment

9
veg 9:24 am
15 Mar 13
#

I thought that her attempt to tie in the “open” plan of WBG’s design with the curent “secretive fortress” attitude was quite weak. I would have preferred to see either a doco on WBG or a doco on the spy stuff.

I realy dislike her “reporting” style too with all her subtle looks at the camera and “I’m above this” attitude. Although it wasn’t as painful as her contrived Kitchen Cabinet show. I’m trying to think of a better word but I think the OPs “twee” comment is just about perfect.

Plus I couldn’t help but laugh at all the dark footage and especially the bit where they are just driving around the old ASIO building carpark to make it appear grey and boring

Report this comment

10
Madam Cholet 9:27 am
15 Mar 13
#

devils_advocate said :

poetix said :

Mikhail Gorbachev, not Michael. And that’s a shocking story; that so very few people turned up to interview him.

No, the spelling would be closer to ??????. As far as attempts go to put a phonetic translation into roman letters, Mikhail and Michael are roughly equivalent.

And Australians are very good at Anglicising people or place names. And how do we know if we are pronouncing his surname correctly?

Report this comment

11
HiddenDragon 10:36 am
15 Mar 13
#

“Annabel does come across as far too twee at times” – perhaps, but this is, after all, the ABC – where (with apologies to Roy & HG) too much tweeness is hardly enough. I’d much rather this than yet more of Kevin McCloud or Stephen Fry (and Annabel looks so much nicer in a floral frock).

Even if this, and Kitchen Cabinet, offer some offence to the exquisite sensibilities of some Canberrans, I think Annabel is at least helping to make this town appear a little more normal and human to the rest of the nation (i.e. the people whose taxes keep the whole three ring circus rolling along).

Report this comment

12
switch 10:46 am
15 Mar 13
#

Surprised she didn’t go into the VENONA decrypts which mentioned several people here who were being very free with information flow to the Russians back in the late forties. Which led to Chiefly setting up ASIO in the first place. e.g., talk to Ric Throssell about career limiting.

Report this comment

13
JessP 10:49 am
15 Mar 13
#

I enjoyed it! Remeber some of the stories from my youth (Junie and Dr Jim, Coombes affair) and enjoyed getting the inside story.

A good show!

Report this comment

14
secretmumma 11:40 am
15 Mar 13
#

Really enjoyed this, have one question, where was this “Charlies” place/bar they kept refering to?

Report this comment

15
EvanJames 11:47 am
15 Mar 13
#

Every show about Canberra or set in Canberra doesn’t have to be some rah-rah beat up funded by ACT Tourism. Last night’s show was about a very interesting story, I hope there’s more like it. I loved the gossip, and the retrospective view, especially by Coombs himself. Fascinating stuff.

Report this comment

1 2 3

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2016 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Search across the site