19 December 2024

Housing goal the driver for bringing transport and planning together in new directorate

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
22

Light rail and housing go hand in hand. Photo: Jack McCracken.

This week’s announcement of a new ACT Public Service directorate combining Transport Canberra and City Services with the Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate is no surprise.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr has been talking about it all year. The surprise should be that it has taken so long to happen.

Transport, planning and housing have long been entwined in government policy. The first light rail project was as much about property development as providing an efficient way to move people.

The development along the Northbourne corridor has delivered, and continues to deliver, thousands of high-density homes next to light rail.

READ ALSO Low-density housing slump: Here’s what ACT Government should do, says HIA

Stage 2A will also be a spur for new multi-unit housing in City West and at Acton Waterfront, as will 2B, although the development profile will be more mixed, such as what is planned for North Curtin.

It reflects a long accepted urban strategy of developing new, denser housing along transport corridors closer to employment and the city where many people want to live.

But beyond light rail, transport links such as buses, roads and active travel are vital to any new housing whether it be greenfield or infill, so bringing them together is a good thing.

The goal is to streamline development processes and approvals to get much-needed homes built, particularly the so-called missing middle.

The property industry is happy, having had it on its wishlist. Approval delays have long been a bugbear for developers, especially in the current environment of high costs and tight finance.

The government has promised 30,000 new homes by 2030 so it wants the bureaucracy to be in harness to help deliver them, now that the new planning system is in place.

If the recent history of the ACT Public Service is anything to go by, wrangling the two directorates into one entity will not be straightforward and the test will be what results start to flow.

That’s what will matter.

But it won’t simply be a case of waving projects through for the sake of it. Yes, reducing delays and roadblocks is important but at the same time higher-quality outcomes should also be more achievable.

READ ALSO Coalition now says it will slash as much as $30 billion from the public service

The other move is for the multi-headed Access Canberra to come out of Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development, where it administers a plethora of things property related – from fees and registrations to regulation and compliance.

So that too makes sense.

It should mean closer communication and collaboration, easier interaction with developers and builders, and less delays. Fewer executives might also allow for more staff at the coalface.

Again, it will need more than a change of letterhead to make this happen.

But these new arrangements are welcome and hopefully will lead to a more integrated and coordinated approach to delivering new precincts and suburbs in Canberra.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The people of Tuggeranong should be happy to not have light rail. After all the majority of units in Canberra will be built where the light rail goes.

Tuggeranong will be stuck with more parkland and bigger blocks of land. I for one hope it never turns up here.

HiddenDragon9:05 pm 21 Dec 24

In a small, recent city with only one level of government (untroubled by the periodic transfers of power which otherwise characterise democracies) coordination and timely delivery of housing and transport should not be the proverbial rocket science – but apparently in Canberra it is.

Yet another bureaucratic re-jig/re-shuffle is unlikely to resolve the fundamental problems in this area of administration – likewise for the merger of health and community services.

Aside from allowing the government to be seen to be doing something, and thus to play for time, both of these exercises will create lots of lovely bureaucratic busy-work, and be very nice earners for the team-building and various other management consultants around the town – so things will jog along contentedly for some time.

Eventually, and almost certainly before the end of the present term of government, both mergers will be seen as examples of the old saying about old wine in new bottles, and will be bringing forth old (and generally well-founded) whines about the new bottles – and their contents.

GrumpyGrandpa6:17 pm 21 Dec 24

Ok, we are talking LR and the expected apartment infill along the line. All’s good, provided you live in one of the new towers. The problem becomes if you need to join the slow train towards the beginning of the journey. This is why the government has never talked about travel times for commuters starting at Woden, or busing from Tuggers, then needing to change services at Woden to join the LR.
However, LR isn’t about public transport. It’s about property development.

I still think that (Waymo) and self-driving electric cars are the way of the future. Be picked up from your front door and deliver to your destination is a much smarter and properly cheaper option.

Transport has a goal of moving people the least and slowest way possible.

Eventually we’ll all be living in one of those uni container houses.

Leon Arundell1:42 pm 20 Dec 24

One of the best ways to reduce transport costs, traffic congestion and transport emissions is to plan our city so that more organisations locate closer to their clients and their employees (rather than locating centrally in the CD), more people live within cycling distance of where they work or shop, and more people live within walking distance of schools.

another option is get rid of Hight limits in Canberra. A 50 story building could have 45 floors of residential and 5 floors of office space. No need to ride that pesky bicycle when you have catch a lift to work. There is also infill where you use every small piece of land.

Other option is to cut down on immigration and plan cities better.

You have to have rocks in your head to believe that they will achieve 30,000 dwellings over the next 5 years.
That is like 16 dwellings per day for the next 5 years… In your Dreams!

Funny how it has taken the breakup of the ALP/Green alliance to finally make Barr realise that all this is now down to them. No chances to blame the partner (as useless as they were) for all the mistakes and poor decisions. Could be an interesting four years.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.