4 September 2024

Lyneham parents push for 30 km/h trial around schools

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
68
People using a footpath outside Brindabella Chrisitan College

Is 40 km/h not slow enough? Lyneham parents are asking. Photo: Kate Bradney.

A long-running campaign to lower Canberra’s residential speed limits to 30 km/h has received fresh backing, this time from parents in Lyneham.

Kate Bradney, with kids in the Lyneham Primary School, is on a mission to make the morning school run safer.

She founded the local group ‘Walk Cycle Lyneham and Beyond’ to encourage active travel in the area, and in December last year, launched the ‘Lyneham Primary School Bike Bus’ together with Paris Lord from ‘Canberra by Bike’.

Every Wednesday morning, a rolling convoy of kids on bikes set off from the North Lyneham Shops, accompanied by Kate and Paris and often a few parents, en route to Lyneham Preschool, Lyneham Primary School and Brindabella Christian College.

READ ALSO Ever wondered what one of Canberra’s oldest houses is like inside? Ruth is opening hers this spring

“Some people meet us at the start, others literally wait along the route, and the older kids often ride with us for a little bit before they peel off and finish the trip by themselves,” Paris explains.

“It’s a convoy of joy. We play loud music, we sing and ring our bells, all that kind of thing.”

It’s inspired by a worldwide ‘bike bus’ movement, and the idea is safety in numbers.

“At its peak, it attracts around 50 kids,” Kate says.

However, the bike bus entered a hiatus around May of this year due to a near miss outside the Brindabella Christian College car park.

Children wearing bike helmets

Children ready to board the ‘bike bus’. Photo: Kate Bradney.

“One driver who dropped their children off then pulled out in front of children riding and claimed they didn’t see them,” Kate says.

“In another instance, earlier in the term, a driver illegally dropped their children in a bus zone on Brigalow Street, then crossed onto a footpath to try turning right and skipping traffic.”

Now, with the weather warming up again, Kate and Paris have decided to relaunch the bike bus with “a lot of improvements and strategies to keep kids safe”, including volunteers to stop and direct traffic around the problematic car park.

But they’re also campaigning for lower speed limits around Lyneham as a longer-term solution.

“The kids and the community in Lyneham just love to ride – it’s a big part of our culture – but it’s becoming more and more dangerous to ride, and this is a way of bringing the joy back into riding and … also attention to how much we need more traffic calming measures,” Kate says.

READ ALSO Electric bike library charges into Tuggeranong

The petition for 30 km/h streets is nothing new.

In 2021, the World Health Organisation (WHO) launched a campaign, arguing slower streets would “save lives and protect all who use them, especially the most vulnerable, like pedestrians, cyclists, children and older people and people with disabilities”.

“When streets are safe, people walk and cycle more,” the website reads.

In the lead-up to last year’s ACT Budget, Pedal Power ACT again lobbied the government to drop the speed limit from 50 km/h to 30 on roads without separated cycle lanes or off-road cycle paths.

ACT Greens leader Shane Rattenbury responded by saying the focus should be on improving cycling infrastructure and “being kind to each other on the roads”.

Riding a bike to school

The bike bus was put on pause after an incident outside the Brindabella Christian School car park. Photo: Kate Bradney.

Kate and Paris, however, offered Lyneham as the place to see how it could work.

“We think Lyneham would be a really nice place to pilot 30 km/h speed limits,” Kate says.

“We think it’s time it was tried here in Canberra because there are other jurisdictions in Australia that are doing it now, and it ultimately results in a better quality of life,” Paris adds.

“Traffic noise is lower, people feel safer … and it’s a way of getting people outside and moving in their neighbourhoods.”

Join the conversation

68
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

distinct lack of at least one very important thing in this story: evidence of ongoing dangers due to the current speed limit. There were a couple of examples of people doing stupid things, that could have been avoided if we’d only locked them up at home, but apart from that, nothing about speed, and even if it did, the examples were only very limited.

The prognosis: this brain fart is the result of people having much too much in *life, with the decadence leaving them with nothing more to do except make life a living hell, in pursuit of unrealistic safety levels of perfection, that can only be attained by not living.

If, despite things mostly being good, for most people, most of the time, all you see are dangers around every corner, then either keep to yourself at home in your own little corner, or go and get yourself looked at by a shrink, leaving the rest of us alone to just live.

And while I’m on a role, I might as well include the following for your edification: everyone being driven mad by 30km/h, in order to fix a kids’ problem that wasn’t shown to exist, is truly something special when you place it alongside how people like in this story probably support abortion – or the ripping apart of fully formed babies with clamps.

Whatever world some people live in, it’s totally mad.

*not a reason for socialism.

I agree that this is something worth trialling. After all, plenty of European cities have 30km/h limits on residential streets. However, there needs to be more traffic calming measures (as mentioned in the article) and better enforcement to go along with it. These measures do make streets safer.

Incidental Tourist9:16 am 09 Sep 24

More kids get injured in private driveways where speeding is not an issue. Honestly I don’t believe such speed reduction even outside of school hours has much connection with the safety of kids. Locals simply want less traffic through their front yard. The same narrative was used in the civic centre around 40 km/h zone which makes traffic bottleneck and extra fines revenue.

Steven Green8:06 am 09 Sep 24

I advocate for 30 kph around schools. And make the limits permanent, not just during school times. School buildings are regularly used for other activities outside school times.

Given all the stupid driving that happens before school down that street it’s surprising that I’ve never seen any police there monitoring/pulling people over. I get that it’s busy and slow there, but everyone is in the same situation and these people act like they are the most important people there (often at risk to pedestrians and other vehicles alike).

An aspect of traffic safety is the psychology of risk acceptance and habit. A probable unintended consequence is that with traffic at only 30kph or less, pedestrians, etc will perceive a lower risk, and thus be more likely to move out in front of traffic. This effectively would tend to treat the 30kph zone as a ‘shared’ zone. That would be very unsafe as ‘shared’ zones have a much lower speed limit. Also in other less local streets where the speed limit is higher, habit can kick in with unfortunate consequences.

Road safety is a very complex area, and what seems to be an obvious straightforward idea (which apparently works in another environment) may not be so straightforward as it seems.

It’s worth a shot?

By this reasoning, the only truly safe risk free speed is zero so let’s go the whole way and just ban movement.

Then everyone will always be safe all the time.

Steven Green8:09 am 09 Sep 24

Not a bad idea. Let’s limit traffic around schools as much as possible. Make the area a pedestrian mall to encourage walking and riding to school.

How would a 30km speed zone prevent a ‘near miss’ from a parent pulling out and not seeing?

Similarly, it is already illegal to stop in bus zones, so reducing a speed limit to 30km/ hour will also not be effective in making anyone safer.

Are there any incidents actually relating to speed? Where a driver going 40km / hour injured a child? Or nearly injured a child? Of course not a driver exceeding and already speeding in such a zone.

What about the back of Alfred deakin high that has never been a school zone – despite the fenced side of Melrose high counted as a school zone?

What about limiting the times of school zones like nsw so it is actually the busy pick up and drop off times and not an arbitrary all day thing when kids are in school.

Steven Green8:19 am 09 Sep 24

If reduces the stopping distance from 45 to 30m, mostly due to the distance travelled during the response time. 15m is a big difference.

In South Australia it’s 25 kph. So yes, 30 is appropriate. Children are not all trafic smart and can pop out anywhere. 40 kph is 11 metres per SECOND. Even 30 kph is 8 metres per second.

Steven Green8:23 am 09 Sep 24

Considering it takes the average driver 2.5 seconds to apply the brakes this reduces the reaction distance from 27.5 to 20 metres.

If you take 2.5 secs to apply the brakes to avoid an accident, please surrender your licence

wildturkeycanoe6:50 am 08 Sep 24

From the examples given above, it doesn’t appear that speed is a problem, it’s the quality of driving. Whether cars are doing 10,20 or 40km/h there wouldn’t be any issues if people obeyed the road rules and children were aware of their surroundings or being properly supervised.

Parents who are under pressure to get to work on time but feel the need to drop their child off as close as possible to the front doors of the school are the issue.
If parents be this concerned about vehicles around schools, why not just prohibit cars in the area altogether and have an exclusion zone. Then you’ll have the safest possible environment.

One thing that does my head in is having 40 zone all day long. Kids should not be outside the school premises between 9 and 3, so why do drivers have to slow down? Works for NSW!

Neil Madgwick11:29 am 08 Sep 24

Or does it.

“Kids should not be outside the school premises between 9 and 3, so why do drivers have to slow down?”

Sometimes they go on authorised school excursions where they walk off the school property.

Kids have been known to chase balls across roads which can happen during lunch time and recess.

I’ve known of some kids who get upset and run from school.

Some kids just sneak away from school for a bit to smoke/drink/etc.

Colleges (years 11 and 12) have 40 zones. Their students only need to be on premises when they have class. Students whose first class isn’t until 11 (for example) don’t have to be there until that time so there is a constant glow of kids arriving and departing from them

Great idea – kids should be able to get to school safely and independently without mum and 1.5 tonnes of steel

I fully support the proposal, but it’s only part of the solution for Lyneham. The biggest problem is that no traffic plan has been imposed on Brindabella College. The strip of public land they have been allowed to take over as a parking lot only has a single entry and exit point. Traffic backs up to the lights on Mouat St during pick up and drop off times. I’ve twice seen cars bump each other entering and leaving the carpark.

Absolutely. The terrible situation is traced back to this poor planning, unregulated enrollments expansion and this school constantly breaching development rules.

We should fight the illegal car park, and enrollments, but in the meantime, we can re claim the streets and make it safer for local kids to walk and ride to school again by calming traffic, especially the cars that rat run after they leave this carpark.

It’s horrendous that this car park and this school has taken away our right to safely enjoy our suburb.

ChrisinTurner2:05 pm 07 Sep 24

30 Km/hr applies to most of Paris. Seems to work OK.

I get the feeling it’s going to take a tragedy before something is done about the traffic on Brigalow Street.

There was a tragedy, an elderly gentleman was killed while crossing the raised pedestrian crossing at the Brigalow St/Lyneham Shops in 2022.

Yes, and they upgraded that crossing. I’m thinking down further around BCC.

Yes, and they upgraded that crossing. I’m thinking down further around BCC.

Fully support Lyneham and looking at the same concept in Ainslie.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.