5 August 2024

Let's put safe cycling high on the election agenda

| Grit Schuster
Join the conversation
67
Woman cycling with children

Canberra cyclists have to put up with unpleasant experiences, hazards and obstacles on paths, bicycle lanes and roads that make cycling harder, slower and more dangerous. Photo: Grit Schuster.

Personal transport – such as our cars – is Australia’s fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions contributing to climate change.

One of the alternatives, cycling, is a fun, healthy and more sustainable mode of transport, but it can be scary and frustrating, which turns people off. The upcoming ACT election provides the opportunity to create an equitable multi-modal transport system.

I cycle every day. My family’s main means of transport is an electric-assist cargo bike we use for most of our commutes to school, work and after-school activities, as well as weekend sports and shopping, health appointments and more. We accumulated over 14,000 km in three years and saved 2100 kg of carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e) from entering the atmosphere compared to having driven the same distance in an average-sized motor vehicle.

We experience many beautiful moments riding through the wonderful bush capital, but we often feel vulnerable and obstructed. Canberra cyclists have to put up with unpleasant experiences, hazards and obstacles on paths, bicycle lanes and roads that make cycling harder, slower and more dangerous.

Cars are mostly prioritised in traffic flow, forcing cyclists to breathe toxic exhaust fumes while waiting for green lights or a safe gap. Cyclists have to be extremely defensive, always trying to anticipate how the design of road infrastructure or a driver’s mistake, like a motorist’s blind spot, may put them at risk of serious injury or even death. Remember, cyclists don’t have any protective metal or airbags around them.

READ ALSO Government can’t afford to turn its back on community sector in its time of need

Shared paths are generally a safer option for cyclists, but obstructions from construction sites, parked motor vehicles, as well as broken paving, muddy and slippery surfaces, sharp corners, steep curbs, fallen branches, broken glass and so on can be dangerous, not just to cyclists, of course, but also to oblivious pedestrians and dogs.

The lack of connectivity of bike paths forces cyclists onto roads or much longer, slower off-road routes.

All this can be intimidating and may prevent people from choosing to replace car trips with active transport.

Canberra urgently needs an equitable, multi-modal transport system. This would result in fewer cars clogging up the roads and polluting our air and climate. However, the planning and building of active travel infrastructure progresses very slowly.

Pro-cycling policies and initiatives, such as those advocated by Pedal Power ACT, Living Streets Canberra, and the Make The Move program, could quickly make cycling, walking and scooting a more attractive option for transportation.

Here are some relatively simple, low-cost actions to immediately promote safer and more convenient cycling.

The ACT Government could reprogram traffic signals at selected cycle-path intersections to prioritise active travellers in traffic flow. This would shorten exposure to hazardous fumes and make trips quicker.

The government should run a campaign to raise awareness about the vulnerability of cyclists and encourage motorists to keep cyclists safe.

The government should promote and incentivise active transport for shorter trips, including promoting quiet streets, creating car-free and shared low-speed zones, and implementing regular ride-or-walk-to-school/work days (not just once a year!)

Similar simple measures have been implemented with success in a number of cities. Examples include:

  • Amsterdam implemented a 30 km/h speed limit for motor vehicles on 80 per cent of its roads – a sign of the city’s commitment to making its streets safer for everyone.
  • In Paris, cycling traffic has increased by 166 per cent, thanks to bold political leadership matched by the proper levels of funding and infrastructure building.
  • In Munich, a city-wide campaign encouraged people to travel by bicycle, and numbers show that concerted investments in behaviour change can have an impact.

The Conservation Council ACT Region Transport Working Group is calling for all candidates in the ACT election to commit to rapidly building an equitable multi-modal transport system that supports more active travel and reduces emissions.

Grit Schuster joined the Conservation Council ACT Region (CCACTR) team in 2023, following her passion to protect our natural environment. The CCACTR is the ACT region’s leading environmental advocacy organisation and hub for community groups, whose mission is to protect nature and create a safe climate future in the ACT and region.

Join the conversation

67
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell4:06 am 12 Aug 24

The Conservation Council, Labor and the Greens will each propose to spend at least $200 million per year on walking and cycling, if they value the greater health benefits and lower environmental impacts of walking and cycling. Each day Canberrans walk 266,700 km and cycle 166,100 km. That’s two thirds of the 645,000 km that we travel by public transport. They all support light rail stage 2 (which will cost $2 billion or more) and the annual $80 million public transport operating cost subsidy.

Has the author ever been to these cities or just writing in the abstract. These cities are very dense. Canberra is just such a boring and over-controlled place these days.

Amsterdam, Paris and Munich have sooooo much in common with Canberra. When are these cycling morons going to grow up?!

Rupert Samuel11:15 am 09 Aug 24

Hmmmm… Using childish insults isn’t exactly the pinnacle of mature behaviour, either.

If you live in the centre of Canberra, it’s got quite a lot in common with those cities. Short commute time, flat terrain, etc. I live in the burbs, designed for cars, which shapes our thinking, or lack of thinking about how transport can work in our town.

I was in Adelaide a few years ago and was pleasantly surprised at how well cycling works there, as the drivers seem to be in a bit less of a hurry, despite it being peak hour. They seem to have have worked out just how little time they saved.

Have you actually spent more than a few nights in any of these places? Population density might make a difference, but then I am just a childish person.

wildturkeycanoe11:03 am 08 Aug 24

Reducing speed limits only increases vehicle congestion. Stop it already with that approach.
I wonder if the cycling fraternity realise the consequences of promoting more people to ride. There will be more congestion on the cycle paths, then they’ll want them widened and eventually due to the number of cycling incidents a new approach to policing, insuring and funding will be needed. The appeal of a relaxing commute on two wheels will turn sour as they get stuck in the new peak hour chaos.

Margaret Freemantle11:33 pm 07 Aug 24

Not everyone can, or wants to ride a bike. User pays.
The government is building light rail as an alternative to cars. Doing well I think!!!

GrumpyGrandpa8:38 pm 07 Aug 24

I don’t know why the pro-cycling fraternity insist on comparing Canberra with places like Amsterdam, Paris & Munich?
We aren’t a densely populated European city. Most of us live in the suburbs, often traveling along 80 or 100kph roads to get to our destinations. Imagine the chaos and road congestion, if like in Amsterdam, 80% of our roads were reduced to a maximum speed of 30kph!

Sadly, I think that suggestions of limiting car drivers speed to 30kph in order to advance cycling is inflammatory and does nothing to encourage mutual respect, and cooperation.

I also can’t help rolling my eyes whenever I read about cyclists saving CO2 emissions, in comparison to driving a car. (2100 kg of CO2 over a 3 year period in this case).
I’m not arguing those numbers, however, someone walking will also produce less CO2 than someone excerting themselves and riding a bike (at speed).
I forget the article reference, but recall reading an article comparing cycling and riding on a bus. There was less emissions from the bus and it’s passengers than from the equivalent number of cyclists exerting themselves, once the bus had reached, approximately 1/2 a load.
So yeah, riding a bike produces less CO2 than driving a car, but filling up the bus is better still.

No, I’m not a cyclists. I own a car, but mostly travel via bus.

After being hospitalised by a driver on my ride home from work last year, I was desperate to get back on a bike as soon as I could. My new ‘safe’ route is 12km instead of 5 and the share paths are bone rattling! We need a serious commitment to build a practical network and maintain the paths we have.

Margaret Freemantle11:26 pm 07 Aug 24

By all means – you pay for it

Margaret, you should try to be more community minded. We can’t afford car infrastructure to keep everyone driving everywhere while our population grows. Or to spend more and more on health while our lives become completely sedentary. Or to fix the climate after clinging on to oil companies to get to the shops. Hope this helps.

Will the cyclists be paying rego for use of the roads? This is hardly priority worthy.

Rupert Samuel11:09 am 09 Aug 24

I do. It’s paid on the car that I almost never drive to work, but use for longer trips.

Oh cool Rupert, so does that mean since I pay for rego on my car, I shouldn’t have to for my motorbikes? Great!

What’s stopping me cycling in Canberra? Well I used to be an enthusiastic cyclist before I found out just how thoughtless, short-tempered and impatient ACT drivers are. I bought a new “you beaut” bike together with the must-have safety gear, attempting to do the right thing to get fit and reduce road congestion. As a cyclist I was extremely careful on the roads and followed the rules. My workplace at the time even had a bike shed, showers and lockers to encourage cycling which I believe most offices in Canberra have these days. I haven’t regained my confidence to get on my bike after a few near misses with anti-cyclist drivers, with one almost taking me out.

I would do everything possible to dissuade any of my children to cycle in the ACT.
I would also gladly pay a registration fee on top of my car’s rego to ride my bike safely in Canberra.

Despite the usual negative posts every-time cycling comes up, I’ve found most motorists to be considerate around cyclists. There are of course the occasional idiots.

Leon Arundell1:56 pm 07 Aug 24

The Conservation Council ACT Region no longer represents Climate Action Canberra, even though Climate Action Canberra has been a member for many years. The Council has not consulted with Climate Action Canberra on any of the more than forty submissions it has made since 2022. Last year the Council’s president expelled Climate Action Canberra’s representative from the Council’s transport working group, without any consultation, because he had argued for electric buses and bus rapid transit.

Maybe, just maybe, this unnamed person was the proverbial “boil on the bum of progress”? Also, is Climate Action Canberra the Group advocating for long range fuel tanks in all large 4WD vehicles?

Leon Arundell9:21 am 11 Aug 24

Every time the transport working group found evidence supporting alternatives to light rail, PTCBR (the “boil on the bum of progress’) made pathetic attempts to discredit the evidence.

And Pedal Power ACT continues to support the Barr Govt who have continued to “commit” to cycling infrastrucutre + investment every election and fail to do bugger all. I love seeing my rates go into the Northside light rail that doesn’t support southsiders nor alternate means of transport as Bus routes have been culled

Only thing this Government has done recently for the cycling community is put in paid parking at Stromlo because that’s what they really wanted….

HELLO, not everyone can afford to run a car. I ride a bike and I catch the bus. I borrow a car if I need to move big things. No, Canberra is not a European city, but it is a clever city. I expect we can work this one out.

Unless you live near Andrew Barr and the light rail, don’t count on it!

Hey Mandy, just wondering why you think sheep who’ve been voting for Andy Baaaa and his mates for 19 years are clever?!!!
Canberra is ruined.

Flapdoodle, I don’t think Canberra is doomed, but we can’t ALL be that dumb that we ALL think we ALL need a car every time we leave the house???

Great article. Cycle commuting is fun, great exercise and often quicker than driving. It is a good mental health buffer before and after work. Do it for yourself if not the environment! Better cycling infrastructure will get more people out of cars and make life easier and safer for cyclists and moterists alike.

wildturkeycanoe9:56 am 09 Aug 24

Since when has cycling been quicker than driving? Your 28km/h doesn’t go close to doing 80.

Depends on distance and where you park. When I lived in Gungahlin my ride to the city was about the same as driving door to door.

Andrew Campbell12:37 pm 06 Aug 24

Excellent points Grit.

Sure, Canberra is not Paris or Amsterdam, but nevertheless many car trips here are only a few kms and every time we encourage someone out of their car and onto a bike, we ease congestion for everyone, including motorists. Encouraging active transport is one of the few win-win-wins in public policy (health, environment, retail revenues, average travel times), and as others have noted, the longer your defer investment, the more expensive it gets.

Rollersk8r8812:08 pm 06 Aug 24

As a commuter cyclist of over 40 years I’d argue we have it pretty good here; and have even gone too far with the installation of cycling lanes in certain places, along with the unnecessarily large 40kmh zone in Civic, as examples. However, the initiatives are clearly working with an exponential increase in the number of electric bikes, scooters and other variants on our paths and roads. The humble pedal-powered bike user is now a threatened species. Active transport is all good and well – until you have an electric scooter coming at you at 70kmh in the dark.

Heywood Smith10:06 am 06 Aug 24

Safe cycling begins with the Lycra brigade. They are very quick to whinge and whine about how unsafe it is to ride, yet want to be on public roads one minute, then if the traffic lights aren’t in their favour, quickly duck onto the footpath, only to return to the road again. Running red lights, disobeying road crossing signal etc etc.

I saw one get into an altercation at a set of traffic lights in South Canberra after the cyclist thought it was okay to lean on a vehicle whilst he waited for the lights to turn green.

They can whinge all they want, they are worse when it comes to obeying the law than those in vehicles.

Rollersk8r8811:47 am 06 Aug 24

Sure, they’re an easy and visible target, but why do road rules start with them? Are certain types of cars more responsible for road rules than others?

Heywood Smith1:08 pm 06 Aug 24

Cars, truck etc have rego plates, a means to monitor behaviour, file reports (such as the current reporting portal) and issue infringements. How are cyclists held accountable for their poor behaviour on our ‘shared’ roads? Even if you have dashcam footage of them running a red light, which is illegal, how would they be held accountable?

I hate to break it to you, but we are not Amsterdam, Paris or Munich. Canberra has a comparatively small, geographically dispersed population of which the VAST majority do not have the option of living close enough to “school, work and after-school activities” to make cycling a viable option. You are advocating for changes that would be very expensive to implement and utilised by a tiny percentage of the population.

Pass.

Much of our trips are short enough to walk and bike, not just the people who live in the inner city, but in all suburbs. Our problem is that once we have a car we use it every time we go anywhere. We lack imagination about what we can do and focus on the longest trips we make.

Yeah, nah. Cycling is well down the priority list for the vast majority of people.

Also, the old “Well they do this in some European cities!” is just BS. Cities like Amsterdam have been built fundamentally different from Canberra, largely because they existed long before cars did. Canberra is about eight times the size of both Paris and Amsterdam for a start.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.