ACT Government to put a price on trees to stop the bulldozers

Ian Bushnell 31 March 2021 47
Tree-lined Canberra suburban street

The ACT Urban Forest Strategy 2021-2045 has been released and points to a more diverse and resilient urban forest. Photo: File.

Developers have been put on notice that damaging or removing trees will come at a hefty price as part of new laws to protect the ACT’s urban forest.

ACT Minister for Transport and City Services Chris Steel said at present developers can remove trees and not replace them, but under plans to stiffen tree protections they face paying out tens of thousands of dollars into a new Tree Contributions Scheme so more trees can be planted.

Modelled on the City of Melbourne scheme, an ACT version would place a value on the benefits of a tree to the community, and if it is damaged or removed in the course of a development the developer would have to compensate for the loss.

“When we place a large value on the benefits a tree is providing to the community, the developer is less likely to want to damage or remove a tree,” said Mr Steel. “And if they do then that is a very significant amount of money that can go to planting out the urban forest.”

Legislation to amend the Tree Protection Act and the Public Unleased Land Act – and create the tree fund to which both government and the private sector will contribute – is expected by the end of 2021, as well as expected planning changes to mandate more space on private land for tree plantings.

On Tuesday, 30 March, Minister Steel released the ACT Urban Forest Strategy 2021-2045, which aims to increase the ACT tree canopy to 30 per cent from the present level of 19 per cent.

He said ensuring the urban forest is protected will be the first objective, before adding an estimated 450,000 trees during the next 24 years.

“It’s a massive task,” said Minster Steel.

This plan includes consolidating the current tree protection framework to include public land where the legislation does not even mention trees.

“At the moment, within the space of five metres you could have a tree that’s regulated by three different acts,” said Minister Steel.

He said public land such as reserves, easements and streets will be doing the heavy lifting when it comes to tree plantings, and the government will be concentrating on areas such as new developments where the tree canopy is low.

Minister Steel also foreshadowed legislation for a minimum 15 per cent of private blocks released to the market to be dedicated to trees, acknowledging the tendency for owners to build out to the boundaries of their properties.

The strategy will result in a bigger, but different, urban forest – one with more diversity, and species better suited to withstand a drier and hotter climate.

The older themed streetscapes of single species are likely to give way to mixed plantings, with no one species making up more than 10 per cent of the urban forest, and a balanced mix of ages.

The strategy calls for a more flexible planting approach that is site specific and less seasonal, instead planting when climatic conditions suit.

Minister Steel says community involvement will be critical to the strategy’s success, advising where trees can be planted but also participating in watering and maintenance.

“It’s going to be a real collaborative government and community effort going forward,” he said.

Minster Steel said more trees will be planted in both infill and high-density areas. He added that the two are not incompatible, and keeping these spaces green needs to be factored into their design.

He said green walls, terrace and roof plantings could also contribute to the 30 per cent canopy cover.

The ACT urban forest is also ageing, and 200,000 trees will have to be replaced during the length of the strategy.

Progress on the strategy will be reported each year and the canopy figure will be updated every five years.

In 2021, the ACT Government will plant 9000 trees.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
47 Responses to ACT Government to put a price on trees to stop the bulldozers
Eleanor Zazoniuk Eleanor Zazoniuk 12:01 pm 09 Apr 21

What about the trees which are supposed to be removed when extending the war memorial?

Virginia Dodson Virginia Dodson 8:26 pm 07 Apr 21

What a joke! Look how many trees the ACT Government have been removing to make way for new developments. If they just looked after the street trees they wouldn’t have to replace them, therefore losing years of growth and contributing to urban warming. What a bunch of hypocrites!

Ol L Ol L 3:06 pm 07 Apr 21

yet another cost add on to housing and with that eventually rental

David Brown David Brown 8:11 am 07 Apr 21

Unless they happen to be in Northbourne Avenue 😥

Cary Elliot Johnson Cary Elliot Johnson 6:12 am 07 Apr 21

Great move. Better stop promoting 250sqm residential blocks of land then.

Kathleen Pooley Kathleen Pooley 4:07 pm 06 Apr 21

How about maintaining the trees we have? The older suburbs are full of trees with dead limbs. There are a number of dead bushes just left on major thoroughfares making a once beautiful city look like some ungodly backwater town.
I was born here and I can still remember the trees being trimmed, and a street sweeper which regularly cleaned the roadside gutters.

The water rates are through the roof and you want me to water your trees at my expense. It is bad enough that I had to fork out $50 for a green bin, so that the large amount of debris dropped regularly by the street tree on my nature strip can be collected.

It is about time that the ACT Government ministers go for a drive, during daylight hours, and just see how dirty and unkempt Canberra has become. The taxes we pay for those services gone by the wayside and spent on building unnecessary monuments to themselves.

pollyhartley pollyhartley 4:06 pm 05 Apr 21

Congratulations. Only a decade or so behind other states who do this already. Meanwhile the government seemingly condones its own contractors to decimate 300 year old scar trees by investigating the incident and finding them (it’s) not at fault, as reported here and elsewhere a few years back. Conflict of interest, anyone? Anyone? Well, a bit of colonial greenwash goes a long way in a place full of tired, overpaid public servants I suppose.

Nick Anderson Nick Anderson 11:51 am 05 Apr 21

Fantastic news

astro2 astro2 8:01 am 05 Apr 21

Peta Fleming – The “beautiful trees they cut down for the light rail” were large eucalypts prone to having branches snap off and smash through the windscreen of your motor vehicle tootling down Northbourne Ave. That is why these large specimens have been replaced by dwarf eucalypts which are a lot less dangerous.

    Capital Retro Capital Retro 10:52 am 05 Apr 21

    The eucalypti mannifera trees now there grow to 20m high. They will have to be pruned to stop the branches fouling the ugly power lines for the tram which will be an ongoing expense and an interference to traffic flow.

    Hardly a dwarf variety at all. Dumb decision all round.

    ChrisinTurner ChrisinTurner 4:48 pm 05 Apr 21

    It is the same trees as Ainslie Ave which are at least 20 m high. Their common name is Brittle Gums, for a reason.

    Capital Retro Capital Retro 6:19 pm 05 Apr 21

    A very ugly tree indeed.

Peta Fleming Peta Fleming 7:42 am 05 Apr 21

Too late for the beautiful trees they cut down for the light rail!!

Paul South Paul South 9:51 pm 04 Apr 21

Opps the tree died

Christian Greten Christian Greten 9:16 pm 04 Apr 21

ROFL - Making your small building project more expensive while bulldozing loads of trees themselves...

HiddenDragon HiddenDragon 8:57 pm 04 Apr 21

This is basically green-washed revenue raising.

The policing of this rule will be entertaining, noting that the current scheme for tree protection on leased land started in the last century as a time-limited (ostensibly) set of restrictions which would be lifted once the significant trees in Canberra suburbs had been identified and listed –

“Minister Steel also foreshadowed legislation for a minimum 15 per cent of private blocks released to the market to be dedicated to trees, acknowledging the tendency for owners to build out to the boundaries of their properties.”

Mark Whithear Mark Whithear 8:01 pm 04 Apr 21

I’m waiting for a cost analysis on planting so many trees close to houses. Firstly your building project will be reclassified as a problem site

Iaian Ross Iaian Ross 7:07 pm 04 Apr 21

That massive tree opposite Ginn Street they had to protect from the Gundaroo Drive duplication works didn't fare well.

    Mark Rattigan Mark Rattigan 1:23 pm 05 Apr 21

    Iaian Ross Do you mean the long-dead aboriginal scar tree? It wasn't protected in order to keep it alive (it was already dead) - it was protected for its cultural value.

Gerard Daly Gerard Daly 2:47 pm 04 Apr 21

Great news

Julia Ross Julia Ross 1:34 pm 04 Apr 21

The ACT government are the worst offenders, either chopping them down themselves or allowing developers to do so.

    Rob Thomas Rob Thomas 2:45 pm 04 Apr 21

    and before them the federal government! They've been chopping down trees since 1901!

Lindsey Wells Lindsey Wells 1:20 pm 04 Apr 21

Trees will come down - government coffers go up ... along with the retail price of land!

Farg Gough Farg Gough 12:31 pm 04 Apr 21

Gum trees hanging over our roads... 🙄 (silent killers)

    Cary Elliot Johnson Cary Elliot Johnson 6:13 am 07 Apr 21

    Farg Gough how many people killed in the ACT?🤔

Liisa Teivonen Liisa Teivonen 12:08 pm 04 Apr 21

Yet the government will plant trees wherever they like, Kambah as an example - right next to foot paths/driveways so that as the tree grows it'll make the footpaths become cracked and lifted, needing repairs that they'll never do

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site