8 November 2009

And now, a bus driver...

| johnboy
Join the conversation
36

The Canberra Times brings word of the efforts made by one Thomas Johnston to make us all afraid of our bus drivers.

Thomas Johnston, 49, of Latham, was charged with administering a harmful substance to another person that was likely to endanger their life.

He was also charged with having child pornography.

Johnston allegedly gave the girl ether on Monday, knocking her out.

The girl and her parents complained a short time later.

This charming man is now out on bail.

Join the conversation

36
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Mysteryman said :

Yeah, I’m purely interested in the numbers – how often the police arrest the wrong people. I probably should have made it clearer in my first post 🙂

To reiterate: define “wrong”. A failure to convict doesn’t necessarily mean that the wrong person was arrested, so it would be very difficult to come up with an actual number.

shadow boxer2:00 pm 23 May 11

Ergo said

It’s time we as a society stopped tolerating this sort of behaviour.

Because we’ve been so tolerant of it up to this point?

Well yes, as the father of 8 year old twins I think we have been far too tolerant of child abuse. Most people get off without a jail sentence.

Spideydog said :

Mysteryman said :

Spideydog said :

Mysteryman said :

I’m curious… how often do you think police actually arrest and charge the wrong person? I imagine that it would be a very rare occurrence.

The whole reason there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, is so that in making the decision of guilt/innocence, they/we aren’t meant to be pre-biased. This helps ensure a fair verdict.

Up until a verdict has been handed down, it is merely a allegation, no matter how “red handed” it appears.

That has nothing to do with what I said. I wasn’t talking about the presumption of innocence. I’m interested purely in knowing how often mistakes are made (or aren’t).

Going on the previous tones from comments made in this thread, I read your comment as “because Police don’t often get it wrong, then most people that go to court, are guilty”. If your curiosity is purely about conviction rates alone, then so be it and I will retract my comment 🙂

Yeah, I’m purely interested in the numbers – how often the police arrest the wrong people. I probably should have made it clearer in my first post 🙂

Is anyone else asking the question where this all happened? If it was at his house, what was the girl doing there alone in the first place? If it was on the bus, why the was girl alone, and what happened to everyone else? I’m not saying that I defend any part of this. I don’t – not by a long shot. But I’m curious as to how this all came about without the parents knowing at the time…

Mysteryman said :

Spideydog said :

Mysteryman said :

I’m curious… how often do you think police actually arrest and charge the wrong person? I imagine that it would be a very rare occurrence.

The whole reason there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, is so that in making the decision of guilt/innocence, they/we aren’t meant to be pre-biased. This helps ensure a fair verdict.

Up until a verdict has been handed down, it is merely a allegation, no matter how “red handed” it appears.

That has nothing to do with what I said. I wasn’t talking about the presumption of innocence. I’m interested purely in knowing how often mistakes are made (or aren’t).

Going on the previous tones from comments made in this thread, I read your comment as “because Police don’t often get it wrong, then most people that go to court, are guilty”. If your curiosity is purely about conviction rates alone, then so be it and I will retract my comment 🙂

shadow boxer said :

It’s time we as a society stopped tolerating this sort of behaviour.

Because we’ve been so tolerant of it up to this point?

In terms of arresting the wrong person, it depends on how you define “wrong”. There have been plenty of cases where they’ve arrested the person who committed the act, but that person has been found not guilty of the charge for one reason or another. The number of people actually charged with something that they had nothing whatsoever to do with would be pretty low, I expect.

colourful sydney racing identity said :

PBO said :

They should put this clown in jail, hopefully into general population.

*if* he is guilty *sigh*

So there could be a legal and socially responsible reason for placing an ether soaked rag over someones nose and mouth?

Spideydog said :

Mysteryman said :

I’m curious… how often do you think police actually arrest and charge the wrong person? I imagine that it would be a very rare occurrence.

The whole reason there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, is so that in making the decision of guilt/innocence, they/we aren’t meant to be pre-biased. This helps ensure a fair verdict.

Up until a verdict has been handed down, it is merely a allegation, no matter how “red handed” it appears.

That has nothing to do with what I said. I wasn’t talking about the presumption of innocence. I’m interested purely in knowing how often mistakes are made (or aren’t).

Mysteryman said :

I’m curious… how often do you think police actually arrest and charge the wrong person? I imagine that it would be a very rare occurrence.

The whole reason there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, is so that in making the decision of guilt/innocence, they/we aren’t meant to be pre-biased. This helps ensure a fair verdict.

Up until a verdict has been handed down, it is merely a allegation, no matter how “red handed” it appears.

I’m curious… how often do you think police actually arrest and charge the wrong person? I imagine that it would be a very rare occurrence.

shadow boxer11:33 am 23 May 11

Whats going on where someone would drug an 8 year old girl.

It’s time we as a society stopped tolerating this sort of behaviour.

colourful sydney racing identity10:41 am 23 May 11

PBO said :

They should put this clown in jail, hopefully into general population.

*if* he is guilty *sigh*

The Frots said :

PBO said :

p1 said :

Why the hell does a 49 year old bus driver have ether?

Maybe he builds models and such. It is completely legal as the legitimate uses outweigh the illegitimate uses. He could have used chloroform to the same effect. This does not excuse what he did though.

This is interesting. Are you saying that ether can be readily purchased in the ACT – By anyone? Seriously, I didn’t know that. Do you need a licence for it?

This does not mean that I will advertise where to buy it though. They should put this clown in jail, hopefully into general population.

“While I agree alleged crims and their alleged crimes before the courts probably shouldn’t be discussed in any great detail, there does seem to be a trend on RA where attempts are made to shut down discussion on criminal matters by anyone other than AFP members. “

WTF are you talking about, besides showing your pig ignorance of one of the pillars of any judicial system?

BerraBoy68 said :

If an issue is posted on RA as a thread it should be open for comment and debate, otherwise what’s the point?

True, I agree. But it shouldn’t be witch hunt on a person until if and after being found guilty 🙂

PBO said :

p1 said :

Why the hell does a 49 year old bus driver have ether?

Maybe he builds models and such. It is completely legal as the legitimate uses outweigh the illegitimate uses. He could have used chloroform to the same effect. This does not excuse what he did though.

This is interesting. Are you saying that ether can be readily purchased in the ACT – By anyone? Seriously, I didn’t know that. Do you need a licence for it?

Spideydog said :

BerraBoy68 said :

Sorry, I’m just waiting for VG to chime in telling you you’re all children for daring to question Mr Johnston’s innocence before he is tried. Mr Johnston is innocent until found guilty in court, right?!.

Remember, until you hear it from someone who may, or may not, be a policeman (who may or may not be involved in the case), you know nothing.

Are u serious ???? Innocent until proven guilty is the cornerstone of our legal system, its got nothing to do with Police telling you so or not. Pfft. Wake up mate.

Sorry, you’ve missed the point (it’s robably a bit left of field but it relates to another thread too, sorry).

Regardless of how people may or may not feel after a media article about local crime is posted (and lets face it, people draw their own conclusions after reading any media article), there are some RA posters (who may or may not be police) who get quite irate when anyone posts their own point of view after any legal matter is published here. Their response seems to be “you’re not a cop, so shut up”.

Rightly or wrongly, expressing a view on any criminal case is human nature. While I agree alleged crims and their alleged crimes before the courts probably shouldn’t be discussed in any great detail, there does seem to be a trend on RA where attempts are made to shut down discussion on criminal matters by anyone other than AFP members.

If an issue is posted on RA as a thread it should be open for comment and debate, otherwise what’s the point?

BerraBoy68 said :

Sorry, I’m just waiting for VG to chime in telling you you’re all children for daring to question Mr Johnston’s innocence before he is tried. Mr Johnston is innocent until found guilty in court, right?!.

Remember, until you hear it from someone who may, or may not, be a policeman (who may or may not be involved in the case), you know nothing.

Are u serious ???? Innocent until proven guilty is the cornerstone of our legal system, its got nothing to do with Police telling you so or not. Pfft. Wake up mate.

Sorry, I’m just waiting for VG to chime in telling you you’re all children for daring to question Mr Johnston’s innocence before he is tried. Mr Johnston is innocent until found guilty in court, right?!.

Remember, until you hear it from someone who may, or may not, be a policeman (who may or may not be involved in the case), you know nothing.

I’m very sorry to do this to you guys but I’ve worked for him as when he was a district officer for a motorsport fire/rescue group for 5 years and also did a lot on his computers(rebuilding them) I understand what you are all saying but he’s not been sentenced but I’m lead to believe a lot differently as I have some idea of what he is capable of so i’m sitting in the middle so to speak about it honestly until he’s sentenced I don’t know who or what to believe sorry but had to put it out there

I wonder if they found “ether” in the eight year old girls system? that would prove if he is guilty or innocent.

Mike Crowther5:38 pm 09 Nov 09

Bloody hell, is it too difficult to suspend the bloke on full pay until his trial? I know we’re in the ACT and, Human Rights Act notwithstanding, a trial could be two years away, but I think its worth it to secure kids who may ride on his bus. Of course he’s not going to grab one in transit, but a driver is still in a position to groom victims.

It’s a terrible thing to happen – and I can’t begin to imagine how it would feel it were my daughter.

That said, the message to take away from this is *not* that everyone is out to get you and that the world is a scary, threatening place, and we should all be as paranoid as possible. Once you start living like that, you’ll do almost as much psychological damage to your children as a bus-driver with ether.

p1 said :

Why the hell does a 49 year old bus driver have ether?

Maybe he builds models and such. It is completely legal as the legitimate uses outweigh the illegitimate uses. He could have used chloroform to the same effect. This does not excuse what he did though.

A lot has been made of the fact that this monster is a bus driver, when in fact what is more scary is that he was a member of a community… OUR community. God only knows how many other victims he has, and would have continued to have had in the future if this brave family had not come forth!
We live in a world that is not as safe as we would like to think, and if any good is to come of this tragic situation, let it be a warning to us all that no matter how well you think you know someone, or how safe a place you think Canberra is, there are real monsters out there, and when it comes to our kids, we can never be too careful.
My heart goes out to that precious little girl and her family…

It’s bad enough that this nutbag is driving buses at all but please tell me it wasn’t a school bus!

🙁

sepi said :

I can’t believe he’s still driving buses.

A friend told me apparently he was to go back to work today but on the condition that he does not work in the suburb where the girl lived, and apparently if he did end up at work the rest of the drivers are going to strike, the guy who told me this had had a few scotch’s though.

ChrisinTurner12:15 am 09 Nov 09

Wasn’t it only recently that ACTION were employing drivers with drink-driving convictions! Seems ACTION also could do with some clandestine monitoring of their drivers. I keep hearing of drivers who are so rough that standing passengers cannot remain upright. In the worst cases even the seated passengers would benefit from seat belts.

sepi said :

I can’t believe he’s still driving buses.

I somehow doubt he’ll be going back to work.

Why the hell does a 49 year old bus driver have ether?

I can’t believe he’s still driving buses.

sunshine said :

can’t believe he’s out on bail! oh wait – yes i can, it’s canberra

Murderers get out on bail. But then, they’re technically not murders if they are never convicted…

can’t believe he’s out on bail! oh wait – yes i can, it’s canberra

ABC News reports that the incident happened at his house, and involved an eight year old girl.

anonymous gungahlian3:09 pm 08 Nov 09

Maybe Action should have a sanity test for it’s drivers before they are employed. Last year I had a School bus driver who was a nut, I spent an extra 10 minutes walking to a public bus stop near my school every afternoon to get home so I could avoid catching a bus with a looney for a driver. Our morning driver was okay though.

I have a sneaking suspicion if it was my child another person would be getting knocked out as well, probably more than once

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.