26 August 2008

Are we having trouble with the new toilet signs?

| johnboy
Join the conversation
22

Smaggle Style is having a royal rant about the state of the toilet signage in new bars:

    They were a weird mass of glittery swirls and I couldn’t not find any indication of sex on either of them. I must have stood there for two whole minutes until finally one of the impossibly cute waiters tapped the correct door and said ‘This one love, can you see the F?’ I smiled politely and walked through the door but in my head I was screaming ‘No I can’t the see the F! I’ll give you an F! Your trendy mullet sucks and your door signs are redundant!’. I actually went back to have a second go and I stared at the mofo like it was a magic eye picture and I still couldn’t get it.

Anyone else having this trouble? Want to name other culprits? (With no pretensions to be the ABC feel free to name names)

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
dragonflygal10:48 pm 27 Aug 08

fnaah said :

The “biological” symbols (actually, they’re astronomical, based on the symbols for Mars and Venus) used to confuse me until I mentally associated the male one as sort of representing an erection and the female one sort of representing “x marks the spot”.

Go on, laugh.

I used to go to Cube a bit, and they had these signs – I used the same method to remember which was which – unti I realised that it didn’t matter anyway as all sorts used both anyway ;o)

Your mission, should you choose to accept it ….

I agree, this story needs illustrations.

Monster of the Deep12:44 pm 27 Aug 08

Somebody want to sneak a pic of one of these signs next time with their phone? I’m curious.

A very narrow escape Dan.

Yeah for a moment there I thought I was in a B grade American college T+A movie and thougth about peeking over the door for a hot lesbian scene.

Then i remembered I was at the lighthouse so that dispelled anyhopes of that 🙁

This is where an acute sense of smell comes in handy: a faint wiff of stale urine always leads me directly to the male toilet. 😉

A very narrow escape Dan.

If a queue had formed you could have been in there all night.

And then at closing you’d have had to explain to the bouncer just what it was you were doing in there.

I once in a sober state entered the wrong toilets at Lighthouse (Dont laugh I was there for my best mates sisters 21st)

I panicked and just went straight for a stall and sat down.

I then had to count how many times the door opened and closed before I could skulk back out.

I then proceeded to tell all my friends what happened and had a gaffaw.

The “biological” symbols (actually, they’re astronomical, based on the symbols for Mars and Venus) used to confuse me until I mentally associated the male one as sort of representing an erection and the female one sort of representing “x marks the spot”.

Go on, laugh.

Knightsbridge’s signs can be a bit difficult to identify – they use some form of shadow figures on ‘funky 70’s background colours’. To know which door to use, you need to identify the subtle differences where the shadow figures ‘bulge out’.

Yup, had the moment of confusion in King O’Malleys.

Irish pubs making claims of Gaelic authenticity are infinitely worse at this.

The word for man is “Fir”, so they put a big “F” on the door, and and put tiny pictures of men somewhere near the handle.
The word for woman is “Mná”, so they put a big “M” on the door, and put a tiny pictures of women somewhere near the handle.

Hilarity ensues.

Like hovercraft?

Off topic: Why do women hover? Is it like do they miss? Maybe we should hand them out “Pee-mates” or “She pees” (google it) and then we could just have uni-sex toilets and get rid of those silly social norms and signs.

I sometimes have trouble even with normal signs.

I once got changed in the men’s room on board a chartered Sydney Harbour cruise ship. The bemused crew member who discovered me asked, ‘What did you think those were?’ pointing to the little porcelain doo-hickeys. ‘I really had no idea,’ I replied naively and somewhat embarrassedly.

Well, blimmin’ ‘eck, the signage couldn’t have been that good!!

“Ridiculously ambivalent toilet signs”.

I could be wrong, but I think the word the original poster on the Hava Rant site was after was “ambiguous”. I don’t know that the signs themselves can possess or express any emotions of their own. Happy to be corrected…

I’ll admit to having the same problem as her in PJs.

I solved it by stepping back and waiting a sec to see who was going where.

I’m hoping one day it’ll lead me to one of those fabled back room parties.

Holden Caulfield10:34 pm 26 Aug 08

I was wondering where Todd Carney got to.

Vic Bitterman10:21 pm 26 Aug 08

Aeek said :

Does the Ambassador still have the “Mullet” vs “Short back and Sides” as the options?

Such options would fail miserably, when one examines typical female clientele at Tilleys.

Does the Ambassador still have the “Mullet” vs “Short back and Sides” as the options?

Its not a sailboat, its a schooner….stupid head.

No wait it was the other way around

Oh yeah, I see it – it’s a sail boat.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.