10 September 2024

Around 3000 farmers expected at Parliament House to protest against policies that 'decimate agriculture'

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
23
Protesters in front of Parliament House

A group named Keep the Sheep arrived at Parliament House a day before the protest rally. Photos: Rick Wilson MP/Facebook.

Up to 3000 farmers are expected to converge on Parliament House on Tuesday (10 September) to protest against the ban on live-sheep exports by sea, proposed restrictions on working visa arrangements, government purchases of irrigation water and other policies said to be hurting the agricultural sector in Australia.

Motorists are advised that a convoy of trucks and smaller vehicles will enter Canberra early in the morning via the Barton and Federal Highways, and transit between Parliament House and EPIC throughout the day.

Peak body, the National Farmers’ Federation (NFF), is organising the rally.

“The continual march of bad ideas we are facing will decimate agriculture and rural communities,” NFF president David Jochinke said.

“If you care about the ability to have communities living beyond the tram tracks of our major cities, you’ve got to care about agriculture.”

Mr Jochinke said the Federal Government’s decision to ban live-sheep exports by sea by 2028 was indicative of how the sector had been treated.

“The industry was asked to tidy its act up, it was told that it must invest in better processes and procedures,” he said.

”It’s done that. It’s the only traceable, auditable system in the world for live-sheep export from paddock to slaughter … but it’s still to be banned. What industry isn’t on the chopping block if it does what the government asks but the ultimate outcome is it still gets deleted?”

READ ALSO NDIS group homes cost $350,000 per person each year and should be phased out, says Grattan Institute

Advocacy group Southern Riverina Irrigators will be organising a bus to leave from Deniliquin in NSW as early as 2:30 am on Tuesday to reach the protest on time.

This group is primarily protesting against government buybacks of irrigation water, which it says will decimate agriculture in the Murray Darling Basin.

A truck rally of other groups of farmers will start at Goulburn at 6:30 am and Yass at 7 am before coming together to drive down the main street of Canberra and past Parliament House.

At 11 am, a rally on the lawn outside Parliament will hear several speeches.

group protesting with signs

The rally will bring together several grievances against government policy.

All major party leaders have been invited to address the crowd. Nationals leader David Littleproud has confirmed he will take up the opportunity, but the NFF boss is still waiting to hear back from the Labor and Liberal parties to find out whether a representative will attend.

READ ALSO Government adjusts tree protection laws following feedback

Mr Jochinke said there was also concern about the Federal Government taking away the 88-day working holiday visa, which gives temporary foreign workers the ability to extend their visa if they spend 88 days working in a regional area.

“Our concern is that … all people applying for a working holiday visa would not have the incentive to work for 88 days in a regional area to extend their visa to a second or third year … that will absolutely decimate both agriculture and service industries in regional areas,” he said.

“Their argument is it’s a potential avenue for exploitation; our argument is why can’t you help police the requirements better, educate employments and make it easier for compliance … instead of saying it’s bad and we are just getting rid of it?

“This rally is a statement for politicians to be put on notice that agriculture has to be consulted on policies that impact on agriculture.”

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Labor and the Greens couldn’t care less about anyone outside the inner cities. They are destroying country towns with their policies.

Which policies (in brief) are the most damaging?

Katrina Love2:16 pm 10 Sep 24

Ooops – you added an extra zero. Photos from the event and reliable intel puts the crowd at between 200 and 300.

No one hates farmers – they grow our food and fibre – for me, fruit, vegetables, pulses, legumes, beans, nuts, seeds, cotton and hemp. I buy locally and if I can’t buy locally, I buy Tasmanian, and if I can’t buy Tasmanian I buy Australian, and ONLY if I can’t buy Australian, e.g. coconut cream, I buy a product not grown in Australia.

Live export has little to do with farmers – they have no control over what happens to these sheep once they leave the farm gate, and I am disgusted that most of them have now SEEN what happens to them, and all of them know that sheep who would have at least been stunned here are being sent thousands of kilometres and for weeks at sea to have their throats cut whilst fully conscious.

Industry reckons they’ve fixed everything because they have reduced the mortality rate (if they COULD fix it, why DIDN’T they fix it years ago?). Still, low mortality does not equal low morbidity and good animal welfare.

Heat stress is still observed on over 60% of voyages (with sheep and Independent Observers (IOs) aboard and in every month of the year; 80% of IO reports refer to sheep dying from inanition (starvation), and ASEL breaches were observed on 75% of voyages, including

● poor quality feed including mouldy feed
● dirty drinking water
● withholding feed
● withholding water
● non-compliant fleece length
● insufficient space
● incompetent, incomplete or absent euthanasia
● incorrect storage of medications
● lambing (late-stage pregnant ewes should not have been loaded)
● sheep dying or needing to be euthanised for shearing cut infections (injured sheep should not have been loaded)
● sheep dying or needing to be euthanised for dog bite wounds (injured sheep should not have been loaded and all dogs working with sheep must be muzzled).

Live sheep exports by sea is responsible for a net animal welfare loss, and any “farmer” who says they care about their animals should be opposing it as well.

bev hutchinson5:48 pm 10 Sep 24

Clearly Katrina you have been mislead on so many fronts.
1. I was at the rally today and we’ll in excess of a thousand there
2. Sheep and other livestock on ships are extremely well cared for by competent staff and vets.
3. Food and water are never withheld from animals.
4. Sheep that have an open would would never be allowed on a ship.
5. Medication stored incorrectly? Don’t you think a ship would have a fridge.
6. Australia delivers an excellent product and is well respected.
Your rant is 100% fantasy and incorrect. I’m very confident that you have zero experience or knowledge of livestock or farming in general. I expect that you are a typical halfwit that would starve to death if not for farmers. We farmers look after our stock and your attempt to mislead simply didn’t work because your hate is palpable but your ignorance consumes you.

Tylical activist lies, but 300 is still 10 times the size of any of your protests. 🤣

There is abundant evidence to support Katrina Love’s assertions. It’s nothing to do with hate. While dwelling upon the hate word, just have a look at the hate directed to individuals who do not live in rural areas from those who do. Urban life is now the majority in Australia and globally – so you are vilifying more than half the population.

LOL
So it’s fine for city people to make decisions apparently based on total ignorance for rural Australia, but not ok to “vilify” the city people for their ignorance.

Get off it.

@bev hutchinson
So you track every shipment of livestock you sell for overseas export do you?

Katrina Love12:39 pm 26 Sep 24

I’m pretty sure she doesn’t, but I do and have done so for 11 years. I have also read every Independent Observer’s report – all 241 of them – I doubt Bev has, but still, she knows better than I.

Katrina Love12:49 pm 26 Sep 24

I haven’t been misled at all – this is all my own data from industry and Dept of Agriculture (DAFF) – specifically, the Independent Observer reports from 2018 to current.

Evidently it is you who have been misled, swallowing hook, line, and sinker, the spin fed to you by industry:
“The trade is well regulated” – well there ARE regulations, but they are worthless if they are ignored without repercussions.
“We have dramatically reduced the mortality rate” – they have, but A/ that begs the question, if they COULD reduce it, why didn’t they reduce it years or decades ago? and B/ mortality does not equate to reduced morbidity or good welfare.

You can read the Independent Observer reports fro yourself, but I did a detailed analysis of them in 2022, and all the dot points above come directly from them, so yes:

* feed and water IS withheld sometimes
* sheep with open wounds ARE loaded (hence my additional comment of the fact that they should NOT be loaded – this is why irt is an ASEL breach)
* the ships DO have fridges but it was observed that in some instances, medications were NOT stored in them
* there is a MAXIMUM of one vet per voyage, and they are are not on all live animal export voyages out of Australia, though bar one, there has been a vet on all voyages to the Middle East, as is required

Every one of those dot points is 100% correct and verifiable and I would suggest you should probably not comment on that you evidently have no understanding of.

Don’t take away our ability to access effective quasi slave labour under working visas, rather you should spend more money forcing us to do the right thing, which suggests they already know that many don’t do that.

Don’t take away our ability to live export animals, even though a better, more humane manner exists.

Don’t take away our water, that we use to grow water hungry crops not suited at all to the climate – even though you’ll pay us a small fortune for it, and it isn’t mandatory.

Interesting themes amongst all of this after all.

Leanne Behrend11:55 am 10 Sep 24

Let all those protesting the ban be squeezed into packed trucks and ships under same conditions as animals face and see if they still think it’s right
#endlivetransportnow

you do realise that people to accompany the animals on the ships don’t you… vets and regulatory staff stock managers ect are all on the ship also…

Of course not, Milo. These hashtag weirdos are kooky activists who have no idea what actually goes on outside their CBD vegan cafè. They believe what they are told by kooky activist organisations. A large portion of kooky activists seem to believe every farmer in the country is just walking round paddocks being cruel to livestock all day. 🤣

The majority of us who support animal welfare are nothing like your portrayal.

It’s as if Labor and the Greens think that crops are grown in the rear of the supermarket and farmers don’t matter

The only people that wish to continue this cruel and abhorrent trade are those who profit from it. #keeptheban #endliveexportforever #banallliveexportnow

I don’t profit from it, and I think live export shohld continue, and we should ignore kooky activists when making economic decisions.

Nick Stevens9:47 am 10 Sep 24

Are you saying people who care about animal welfare are kooky?

weather we wish for it to continue or not the fact is it WILL continue, if we don’t do the exporting somewhere else will so why not keep it in our hands where we have some regulatory oversight of the process rather than hand it off to another country that don’t have the regulatory oversight that we do. If animal welfare was truly your goal you wold be campaigning for Aus to have more live export.

And there are others who would say to ignore you. That’s just as valid. Who are you to disenfranchise people?

Kooks should be disenfranchised.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.