Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Chamberlains - complete legal services for business

Boy pleads guilty to driving car in hit-and-run incident

By Samuel Gordon-Stewart - 21 August 2005 17

I couldn’t think of a title so I broorwed the one from the ABC Story

A 14-year-old boy has pleaded guilty to driving the car that struck a woman at Civic bus interchange last month.

The family of 21-year-old Clea Rose has released a statement saying she has severe and irreversible brain damage.

Ms Rose has been unconscious since the accident on July 30.

Her family has thanked the community, hospital and ambulance staff for their support.

The teen will be sentenced next month.

I suppose it is inappropriate for one reason or another to comment on what sentence he should receive, so what would be an appropriate penaly for this sort of crime in general?

UPDATED: ABC Online is now reporting that Clea has passed away.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
17 Responses to
Boy pleads guilty to driving car in hit-and-run incident
bulldog 1:30 pm 22 Aug 05

He should have ‘Murderer’ tattooed on his forehead and spend the rest of his life as a phlegm recepticle in Garema Place. On days off he gets beaten with big fuckin’ sticks.

In all seriousness though, my thoughts are with the Rose family at this time. Words cannot descirbe the pain.

Thumper 1:05 pm 22 Aug 05

Sleepy weasel,

Hung, drawn and quartered outside the Assembly building.

That would be effective.

Special G 10:56 am 22 Aug 05

I like it.

Growling Ferret 10:23 am 22 Aug 05

The kid behind the wheel of the stolen car was running away from the cops at high speed in a shared vehicle/pedestrian zone. In short, he did the equivalent of discharging a gun in a public area – a car is a dangerous weapon under these circumstances. The kid deserves nothing short of a murder charge…

As a penalty, maybe a public hanging in Garema Place might be enough of a deterrant to other kiddies. And it would add ‘vibrancy’ to the centre of the city as 10,000 blood lusting Canberrans came out to watch…

Thumper 8:27 am 22 Aug 05

Watch Breaker Morant. They applied rule 303 to the Boers….

johnboy 11:27 pm 21 Aug 05

Rule of the gun Kerces?

Kerces 10:32 pm 21 Aug 05

Lucky I refreshed and read gingermick’s comments. Otherwise I was all prepared to complain that I’d battled all the way through that damn article and was still no closer to understanding rule 303.
K

Samuel Gordon-Stewar 10:29 pm 21 Aug 05

Seems fair to me, and cheaper.

gingermick 10:00 pm 21 Aug 05

Thanks jb. You just pipped me at the post.

gingermick 9:58 pm 21 Aug 05

Sorry. .303 inches was the calibre of the Lee Enfield rifle.

“Rule 303” was the one quoted by Breaker Morant in his dealings with pesky Boer farmers.

There is no appeal once applied.

johnboy 9:54 pm 21 Aug 05

Watch Breaker Morant.

Rule 303.

Samuel Gordon-Stewar 8:46 pm 21 Aug 05

Phew, I’m not the only one who doesn’t have a clue what gingermick is talking about.

Kerces 6:54 pm 21 Aug 05

Penalty 303? explanation?
K

sk8erboi 3:42 pm 21 Aug 05

He should be the spokesperson in an ad campaign informing young people about driving responsibly.

gingermick 1:36 pm 21 Aug 05

Penalty 303.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site