Can we just knock off the whole feed-in cap business? Asks Shane.

johnboy 14 July 2011 3

The Greens’ Shane Rattenbury has responded to this morning’s shock ending of the solar feed in tariff scheme

The unexpected overnight re-closure of the feed in tariff scheme has highlighted the need to remove the cap on the scheme according to ACT Greens Energy spokesperson Shane Rattenbury.

“No-one anticipated this cap would be reached in just over 48 hours,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“The good news is that this represents a phenomenal private investment in solar in the ACT, and even more installed capacity for clean energy.

“However, once again we have reached an artificial cap. This situation should never have arisen, and the Greens argued against the imposition of a cap. Feed in tariffs are designed to work by reducing the tariff to manage uptake. The prospect of a deadline is what is driving these unsustainable rushes.

“The recent Greens legislation could only ever play the role of a paramedic arriving on the scene trying to keep a patient alive. Labor and Liberal created this car crash by putting the cap in place.

“We need to recognise the medium to long term value the FIT is creating. These FIT contracts are a fixed price for 20 years at 30c per kilowatt hour.

“Electricity prices have risen more than 50% since 2005/6 and if that continues, we will be paying 30c for grid electricity within 10 years. That will make the fixed price contracts for solar look like a great deal, and will help insulate the Canberra community against further price increases.

“The long term price insulation could be even greater. The demand at 30c for the FIT suggests we could wind the tariff down even further, getting more fixed price contracts at even lower prices.”

Shane also notes that while large scale solar in the ACT is still stuck in the briar patch of scoping studies we now have 30mw of small scale solar.

What's Your Opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
3 Responses to Can we just knock off the whole feed-in cap business? Asks Shane.
molongloid molongloid 11:56 pm 14 Jul 11

TVStar said :

Hang on. Shouldn’t this say “remove the scheme”?

Saying “keep the scheme but remove the cap” because supposedly we’ll be glad years from now when they’re locked in at supplying the grid at 30c when utilities are free to supply at >30c.

I-filed I-filed 6:48 pm 14 Jul 11

I gather from Katie Gallagher on radio this morning that she cunningly mixed micro and medium sized for the purpose of the cap and Gosh! business took it up to the cap in two days, along with some friends & insiders, before householders who don’t have the benefit of inside communication channels missed out. SEriously weasel affair.

TVStar TVStar 5:17 pm 14 Jul 11

Hang on. Shouldn’t this say “remove the scheme”?

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site