23 November 2018

Canberra supports legalising cannabis says local Labor MLA while health expert believes legalisation could nip problems in the bud

| Lachlan Roberts
Join the conversation

Under the bill, Canberrans possessing up to 50g of cannabis or growing four cannabis plants would no longer be committing a criminal offence. File photo.

ACT Labor MLA Michael Pettersson says his bill to legalise cannabis for personal use is gathering “overwhelming” support from the community, while a local health expert believes the legalising of cannabis could have a positive effect.

Mr Pettersson will introduce a bill to legalise cannabis for personal use during the next sitting week which would mean Canberrans possessing up to 50g of cannabis or growing four cannabis plants would no longer be committing a criminal offence.

The Labor MLA said the sale of cannabis and cannabis-related products would remain illegal but his Drugs of Dependence (Personal Cannabis Use) Amendment Bill 2018 will remove cannabis as a prohibited substance in the Drugs of Dependence Act 1989.

Mr Pettersson said recent Government research has shown widespread support for cannabis legalisation – with 54 per cent of Canberrans supporting the legalisation of cannabis for personal use with only 27 per cent of Canberrans opposed.

“This shows that Canberrans are overwhelmingly in favour of sensible changes to our drug laws like legalising small amounts of cannabis for personal use,” he said. “Cannabis legalisation is not a radical idea. I don’t think anyone should have their life ruined with a criminal conviction for using small amounts of cannabis.

“I think our current drug laws don’t make a lot of sense. I think it’s time we take a long, hard look at whether or not our drug laws are having the effect we want them to have and if they’re not we should have the courage to change them.

“I think Canberra is ready for a sensible conversation about our cannabis laws.”

Mr Pettersson believes there is a lot of evidence that shows cannabis is actually safer than more socially-accepted drugs such as alcohol and tobacco.

“If you look at the total disease burden on our health care system, nine per cent is caused by tobacco and 0.1 per cent is caused by cannabis,” he said. “If you look at the short-term effects of these substances, our hospitals are filled on the weekends with alcohol-fuelled violence while it is rare to see cannabis-related violence.”

Mr Pettersson believes his proposed bill does not affect Federal drug trafficking laws and will not create a marketplace for growing and cultivating large quantities of cannabis for commercial sale. He said the model is a step forward from decriminalisation that is currently in place in the ACT.

The possession of under 25 grams of cannabis for recreational use has been decriminalised in the ACT since 1992 through the Simple Cannabis Offence Notice (SCON) scheme and the limit was later increased to 50 grams.

Dr David Caldicott, the clinical lead at the ANU’s Australian Medicinal Cannabis Observatory, said a regulated market of cannabis could limit availability to underage consumers and could undermine the illicit drug market in the ACT.

Dr Caldicott said the legalising of cannabis could have a flow-on effect into the illicit drug market and organised crime. He said there is no proof that a regulated market would lead to more consumption of cannabis.

“From a public health perspective, there are merits to an argument of a regulated market. It is likely to be met by howls of abuse from more conservative commentators who probably don’t understand the policy implications,” he said.

“The likelihood is that overall it will reduce the harm from drugs. Very few people would argue that increased availability of cannabis would make the city a healthier environment but it is entirely possible that regulating the environment will make cannabis less available.

“If it is good, responsible and forcible legislation, then it might be beneficial to the local population.”

Dr Caldicott said legalising cannabis would keep young people out of the criminal justice system for behaviour the community believes should not be punished so severely.

“Whatever reduces the numbers of foolish young people, who are notorious for making poor lifestyle choices, from destroying their entire lives for what is essentially a trivial crime is a good thing,” he said.

“I think that the most important thing to come out of this a fairly sophisticated conversation that needs to be had.”

Do you think the personal use of cannabis should be legalised? Let us know your thoughts or concerns in the comments below.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
justin heywood2:51 pm 26 Nov 18

Contrary to the opinion expressed by some commenters, there IS a link between cannabis use and psychosis (as always on the internet, if you want the truth, look it up on reputable websites)

Most sensible people recognise there’s nothing wrong with the occasional joint, but then most people would also know some heavy users from their youth who have gone on to schizophrenia and other disorders.

But if legalising cannabis use results in better control of its use, I’m all for it.

Capital Retro10:08 am 26 Nov 18

It will give new meaning to the acronym CBR.

It will now stand for Cannabis, Booze & Rainbows.

Disgraceful suggestion from people who should know better.

A pollie who reckons that public support for X should lead govt to do X… ok, let’s take a quick poll on support for halving rates and doubling public transport? Is the ALP gunna go do that?

And a medical health professional advocating rolling out an experimental approach supporting widespread drug consumption… whilst Australia is in the midst of a mental health crisis (yeah, lets shovel drugs out into the community, given the clear relationship between cannabis and psychosis).

Gee, if only there was somewhere that HAD rolled out legal(ish) cannabis, so we could see what health effects the community suffered from… like spikes in low birth weight infants (then doomed to a lifetime of health/crime/career disadvantage), jumps in psychosis, crime increases. Like the USA:

Birth weight: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180423125052.htm

Psychosis: http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/substance-use-disorder/cannabis-induced-psychosis-review

Crime: http://www.sonomawest.com/cloverdale_reveille/opinion/columns/cannabis-country-marijuana-madness-and-some-sanity-too/article_350a52cc-32b7-11e8-86d4-9fac15c0ef33.html

Great sources, why don’t you just chuck a betoota article up there to compliment the rest of your information?

justin heywood11:14 am 29 Nov 18

His sources look OK.

Of course McManus, if you’ve got better sources showing no effect, just post them.

I’m not a medical scientist, so I’ll go with the consensus of what the majority of the studies say, rather than cherry-pick stuff that suits my ideological bias, (just like the climate change deniers do.)

Thus it appears that Cannabis is not relatively harmless to society, as it boosters claim.

Legalising cannabis will see an increase in it’s use, particularly and most dangerously by drivers. Cannabis slows attentiveness and reaction times. Drivers under the influence of legalised cannabis increase the risk of road trauma, many will consume it as they drive.

Last Christmas ACT Policing announced some 30% of drivers they stopped for RBT or other traffic offences were under the influence of an illicit substance. Would Pettersson and Caldicot be prepared to accept their share of the blame were cannabis to be shown to be a greater influence in road trauma?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.