Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Excellence in Public Sector consulting

Closure of car park at National Library

By peterw 23 July 2012 93

Hi all,

The National Capital Authority has given notice that the dirt car park situated between the National Library and the Lake will be permanently closed (except for special events) from Friday next week. Parking in this area will henceforth become even tighter…

From the National Library website:

Changes to car parking
Posted on: 23rd July 2012

The National Capital Authority will commence restoring the Patrick White Lawns, adjacent to the National Library in August 2012. The area will close at 5 pm on Friday 3 August and will no longer be available for car parking except for temporary use during special events.

The Patrick White Lawns commemorate the 1973 Australian of the Year and the first Australian to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. The restoration of the area is listed as a high priority in the Parliament House Vista Heritage Management Plan.

Visit www.natcap.gov.au for further information.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
93 Responses to
Closure of car park at National Library
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
5
Geeko 1:26 pm 06 Sep 12

The heat has been turned up on the lack of parking, but so far only more smoke and no flames or light.
The 666 radio interview this week highlights the fact that the issue is largely within the control of the NCA if they choose to act- rather than continue to defer to committees, or reviews, or studies.

The realities are
there is plenty of car parking in the zone – a largely empty mutli story carpark is located in barton
the workers there elect to park near questacon for free and walk over, other civic workers park and walk over the bridge. Tourists with young children and prams and now knoweldge of our poor public transport system are displaced. The institutions in parkes are for the nation to experience, the visitors deserve to be furious, and are. Just wait until we try to put a few more 100,000 tourist in next year for the centenary.

To rub real insult into the self serving actions of the NCA and friends, they have stated they will turn car parks in the national library over to short term free 3 hr parking. Strange that the NCA headquarters are DIRECTLY opposite those car parks, making it a dream for their staff to pick up car parks when they drift into work, walk over and swap cars at lunch time..

Is the lack of action also anything to do with the central departments of finance and treasury having an agreement in place with there staff to provide free care parking under their certified agreements. So if the car parks become pay parking those agencies will have to pay for the car parks and the fringe benefits…. HOW do the ACT public servants in civic feel about that ???? worth an ask for you next negotiation… its tax office approved ( well for their staff …… naaah naaah ne nahh nah….)

its about time the shiny bums stopped serving themselves and started serving the public.

Jethro 11:41 pm 27 Jul 12

c_c said :

Canberra is *not* New York, London or Melbourne

Try typing on RiotACT with an iPhone sometime, really something that needs to be improved with the next site revision.

Or a phone operating on Android.

I have a feeling it is the phones though, not this site specifically.

I have trouble creating any form of bulk text on my phone.

c_c 6:46 pm 27 Jul 12

Canberra is *not* New York, London or Melbourne

Try typing on RiotACT with an iPhone sometime, really something that needs to be improved with the next site revision.

Antagonist 6:16 pm 27 Jul 12

c_c said :

Only a retard would keep comparing Canberra to cities with populations in the millions.

Canberra is *note* New York, London or Melbourne.

You do see the irony here, don’t you?

damien haas 5:27 pm 27 Jul 12

The senior bureaucrat in the CT article I referenced was whining about tourists not being able to park. I pointed out that there are alternatives to parking and driving.

I apologise for using the term retard as an insult. I hope I have not offended anyone.

Canberra has national institutions, promoted nationally as cultural treasures for all to share and visit. You are being deliberately obtuse in ignoring this.

In most cities tourists use public transport to visit these types of attractions, i really cant see how i could explain this any more clearly. im sorry if your extensive research shows that public transport must deliver all people to 200 metres of their destination or it isnt practical, its not a statistic I’m familiar with.

c_c 4:00 pm 27 Jul 12

damien haas said :

When you visit New York, London or Melbourne – do you drive to the main tourist attractions ?

I recall a combination of walking, subway, tram and ferry.

Only a retard would ignore the obvious solutions.

Higher population density, larger economy, true 24hr public transport.

Only a retard would keep comparing Canberra to cities with populations in the millions.

Canberra is note New York, London or Melbourne.

davo101 3:14 pm 27 Jul 12

damien haas said :

When you visit New York, London or Melbourne – do you drive to the main tourist attractions ?

Let’s see. Cities where I didn’t drive to tourist attractions:
Manhattan (population density 27 000/km^2)
London (population density 5200/km^2)

Where I did:
Melbourne (population density 1600/km^2)
Canberra (population density 1100/km^2)

damien haas said :

Only a retard would ignore the obvious solutions.

Yeap, in this town it’s known as a bus.

pajs 2:38 pm 27 Jul 12

One of my jobs is in the Parliamentary Triangle. I used to think paid parking was a bad idea for here, as we did not have the equivalent services of a town centre (post office, shops, more childcare etc). But the more I got into taking the bus from where I live (northside) to and from work, trying out different route options to shave off trip time, the more I think I should change my mind. I now think that paid parking would be a good thing here, as it would free up parking spaces for commuters who needed to fit in the child-care run or for tourists to get to the attractions. I’d be out of pocket for those days when I need to drive, but think the benefits outweigh the extra cost.

devils_advocate 2:20 pm 27 Jul 12

carnardly said :

The carpark at Treasury often has spots available up until 9.30 am.

That is within walking distances to most places within the Parly Triangle for healty people.

But maybe people don’t want to walk more than 200 metres.

Are you sure those aren’t the SES spots? the regular spots fill up by 9 at the latest.

On the other occasions when the dirt carpark has been closed (filling the potholes etc) the questacon carpark has been filled by 9:15.

davo101 1:55 pm 27 Jul 12

carnardly said :

But maybe people don’t want to walk more than 200 metres.

The rule of thumb for transport planning is that people won’t walk further than 400m for bus or LRT or 800m for heavy rail. Which would explain the whining about a lack of public transport in the Triangle when then are many routes going past on Commonwealth Ave (it’s just too far to walk).

damien haas 1:49 pm 27 Jul 12

When you visit New York, London or Melbourne – do you drive to the main tourist attractions ?

I recall a combination of walking, subway, tram and ferry.

Only a retard would ignore the obvious solutions.

carnardly 11:37 am 27 Jul 12

The carpark at Treasury often has spots available up until 9.30 am. That is within walking distances to most places within the Parly Triangle for healty people. But maybe people don’t want to walk more than 200 metres.

5

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site