26 March 2025

Coalition votes against Labor's budget tax cuts

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
81
Hon Peter Dutton MP

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton says Labor’s tax cuts are a hoax. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The Coalition has voted against the budget’s tax cuts, which the government introduced with legislation to parliament Wednesday morning (26 March) in a bid to force the Opposition’s hand.

Introducing the tax cuts bill immediately after delivering the budget was an unusual move on Labor’s part – a tactic revealing just how poised Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is to call the election.

Opposing tax cuts is also unexpected from the Coalition.

But Peter Dutton described the extra tax cuts of up to $268 in the first year and $536 the next as a “hoax” and promised a better offer in his budget reply speech on Thursday night.

Labor’s bill cuts the 16 per cent tax rate to 15 per cent next year and 14 per cent after that, and will cost the budget $17.1 billion over four years.

READ ALSO Tax cuts for all in a Federal Budget that ignites election race

The Opposition Leader has gone against usual conventions and dismissed the proposed cuts.

“What’s obvious here is that a 70 cent a day tax cut in 15 months’ time is just not going to help families today who are really suffering,” Mr Dutton said.

“Labor’s created not just an economic crisis, not just a housing crisis, but a crisis of confidence, and there are a lot of people across the country who are working harder than ever before and they just know that this government’s budget has made it even harder for them to pay their bills.

“There’s nothing structural around the energy system, of trying to address grocery price problems that people are experiencing every day in their own budgets, and that’s the missed opportunity of this budget.”

Nevertheless, Labor’s tax cut bill passed in the House of Representatives (91 to 55) and is expected to pass in the Senate by the end of business Wednesday evening.

A guillotine motion forces a final vote in the Senate at 10 pm, and the government has already received almost all of the support it needs from the crossbench.

Should it pass both Houses, it would mean Mr Dutton would have to legislate to undo the tax cuts if the Coalition wins the election.

READ ALSO Budget shows more public servants but mostly at the expense of consultants

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor described the budget as being one for “the next five weeks, not the next five years”.

He defended the Opposition’s decision to oppose the tax cuts.

“This is a budget for an election, not one for our country’s future prosperity,” Mr Taylor said.

“At a time when living standards have suffered the biggest collapse on record and when the security environment is the most dangerous since the Second World War, Labor’s budget has failed to deal with the economic and national security challenges our country faces.

“Labor’s cruel hoax tax changes in 2026-27 fail to restore the standard of living you have lost after three years of Labor.

“The Coalition will not support these tax changes that do nothing to address the collapse in living standards under Labor.”

Jim Chalmers, Treasurer of Australia

Treasurer Jim Chalmers says the election will be about the economy, and that’s what he wants. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

It all allowed Treasurer Jim Chalmers to use his National Press Club post-budget address on Wednesday in the Great Hall of Parliament House to point out that Mr Dutton had “backed in” Mr Taylor in a “dramatic break” from the Coalition’s approach.

“Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers,” Dr Chalmers said.

The Treasurer outlined his view that the imminent federal election will be fought on the economy.

The election will be a referendum on Medicare, he said, and a “simple choice” between Labor’s tax cuts and cost-of-living assistance and Mr Dutton.

“Above all else, it will be an election about the economy and that’s exactly what I want,” Dr Chalmers said.

With the budget delivered and the Treasurer’s press club speech done and dusted, the next thing for Labor to set an election date.

In the meantime, all eyes will be on Mr Dutton on Thursday and what he will promise during his budget reply speech.

“We’ll make a very significant announcement on Thursday night,” the Opposition Leader promised.

Join the conversation

81
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist7:40 am 28 Mar 25

We live in interesting times when traditional policies migrate from one party to another. Tax cut definitely belongs to Liberal and National and indeed opposing it was unexpected from the Coalition. While on national level Labor started picking Liberal policies, on state level Labor borrowed many policies from Greens.

Let’s remember that a major contributor in the cost of living are State taxes and red tapes. ACT leads the pack of most taxable jurisdictions.

Exorbitant tax like Land Variation Charge (LVC) introduced by Barr’s Labor or exorbitant land price adds to the cost of living of families before they enter their new house. LVC is renamed Stamp Duty mark II with the only difference that is much higher. Unfair and “efficient” Rates, Land tax and sewerage alone often exceed 20% of rent, impacting poorest tenants who can afford it least. New GP tax is yet another example of disgusting tax on poor. Green’s populist “Minimal rental standards” merely wiped out cheap rental houses in prime locations making no difference to the remaining rental stock. Changes to rental laws resulted in the record low construction activity jeopardising 30,000 new houses by 2030 while gradually reducing rental stock every day. Labor/Green infill policy result in smaller dwellings. There are many other local taxes like payroll tax, various application costs, car registration, driver’s licence costs, and many other taxes and red tapes on businesses which result in the cost of living crisis.

You neglected to mention the vacancy rate Incidental Tourist. It surely would support your argument? No?

It is good to know we can always rely on Incidental Tourist to stand up for the profits of dubious landlords by private capture of public value and exploitative denial of living standards for renters.

Where I come from one term for that is bottom-feeder.

What tax cut? Given government caused inflation is still in full force, and that nothing ever gets done about bracket creep, many of us are already paying more tax than we were before Labor was elected if we just got basic cost-of-living salary increases.

Even in the best of times, a progressive tax system with even the target 2% inflation, means continuously increasing taxes over time as a matter of course as people get salary bumps to account for CPI. That increased in salary is always at the highest tax bracket you’re in.

That’s just the result of a progressive tax system were the brackets aren’t linked to inflation. Inflation itself is also taxation by other means, as it reduces the value of money itself.

@TheSilver
“Given government caused inflation is still in full force …”
… and the factual basis for your partisan assertion?

Bracket creep has been a thing for successive governments (of both flavours) since progressive income tax was introduced in Australia – well before “Labor was elected”. No government wants to automatically index tax brackets, because it gives them a revenue boon, until eventually they defer to “pressure” and raise the related income levels.

HiddenDragon8:45 pm 26 Mar 25

“It all allowed Treasurer Jim Chalmers to use his National Press Club post-budget address on Wednesday in the Great Hall of Parliament House to point out that Mr Dutton had “backed in” Mr Taylor in a “dramatic break” from the Coalition’s approach.”

The most entertaining and encouraging aspect of today’s NPC knees up is that senior members of the gallery did not buy into this distraction and pressed Chalmers with questions of the sort which almost saw the public mask dropped.

In so many ways, this is going to be an interesting – if not at all edifying or inspiring – campaign.

GrumpyGrandpa7:54 pm 26 Mar 25

Sneaky politics by Albo to introduce legislation for tax cuts before the election, as opposed to making people re-elect the government to get the benefit. I thought it was interesting that Dutto didn’t support them.

All I can conclude is that Dutto has a tax cut that he intends to “trump” Albo with. (Sorry had to use that line). 😂.

Let’s face it, the size of Albo’s tax cut is pretty embarrassing.

The thing I’ve noticed about the budget is that a number of the promises, are temporary:

● Pub beer excise – 2 years only, but nothing for a case of beer.
● Electricity rebate – only through to December.
● Hecs – 20% reduction to existing debts, but an increase in the income threshold, before payments are required (meaning of course that student debts will rise to higher levels, before repayments start).

Of course, we await the Opposition’s response and need to be also prepared for disappointment.

Undoubtedly, as the election campaign gets under way, we’ll all be astonished at the speed that both parties will spend our money!

Tempus Viator4:12 pm 26 Mar 25

I keep hearing that the government spend is greater than the government revenue. If that is correct and we are running into long term deficit I would have thought that providing a tax cut (ie reducing revenue) is not really a ‘healthy’ position to take.

frizzyjimjim7:53 pm 26 Mar 25

How about making informed comments rather than those based on what you hear.

Labor broke a promise to deliver the Coalition’s stage 3 tax cuts so they shouldn’t expect any favours from Dutton on tax reform. Middle and high income earners pay an unfair amount of the tax burden. Expect Dutton to come out with a policy announcing serious tax reform during the election campaign making a fairer system.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.