Construction of prison’s 80-bed reintegration centre in doubt

Dominic Giannini 23 March 2021 7
Exterior of Alexander Maconochie Centre.

The planned construction of an 80-bed reintegration centre adjacent to the Alexander Maconochie Centre appears to be in doubt. Photo: File.

The Government’s restorative justice centrepiece from the 2019-2020 budget is in doubt after being put on hold.

The 80-bed minimum security reintegration centre had an allocation of $35 million to build and staff the facility and provide prisoner programs.

The project formed part of the ACT Justice and Community Safety Directorate’s plan to reduce recidivism rates in the ACT by 25 per cent by 2025 through developing and implementing programs focused on rehabilitation and reintegration.

But some prisoners at the Alexander Maconochie Centre (AMC) have been told that ACT Minister for Corrections Mick Gentleman does not want to proceed with the planned construction, and the project has been put on ice, Region Media understands.

Minister Gentleman told Region Media he is “considering options to best meet the needs of detainees and staff” when asked if the program is being scrapped.

The project, which was to be built adjacent to the prison, includes an expansion and modification of existing buildings, five new two-storey buildings, which include a new entry and administration building, and fencing.

It is opposed by the Prison Officers’ Union, which is concerned about overcrowding at AMC.

Construction was originally expected to begin on the cottage-style facility by mid-2020 and completed by 2022. A development application was lodged in July 2020, but no tender went out.

Despite the delays, Minister Gentleman said the centre remains funded in the ACT Budget.

Shadow Corrections Minister Elizabeth Kikkert called on the Government to be more transparent about what their plans are for the centre.

“If funding remains in the budget, but there is no current tender the government needs to come clean and tell Canberrans what their plan is and what options they are considering,” she said.

“We now have a government that can’t handle adequate staff training on their own, a transitional release centre that has been described as a joke by the people it is meant to serve and a reintegration centre that has been put on ice.”


READ MORE: Centre to help prisoners reintegrate in society failing, a ‘running joke’, AMC detainees say


The transitional release centre (TRC), which the Reintegration Centre is intended to expand, was originally constructed in 2009 with 20 beds, but complaints have been raised recently about its limiting eligibility criteria.

Nine male and three female detainees used the transitional release program to transition out of custody and back into the community in 2019-2020. There were 539 releases of detainees on remand and 336 releases of sentenced detainees in the same period.

Only male detainees are housed in the TRC, while female detainees complete the program from their usual cells.

ACT Corrective Services told Region Media in January 2021 it was investigating the effectiveness of the TRC to increase access.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
7 Responses to Construction of prison’s 80-bed reintegration centre in doubt
jwinston jwinston 1:51 pm 30 Mar 21

Inca Serrated – I know it sounds crazy but the prison guards union is there for the prison guards, not prisoners.

    Inca Serrated Inca Serrated 9:36 pm 19 Apr 21

    But aren’t prison guards supposed to be the facilitators of rehabilitation? Don’t they like to call themselves correctional officers? Why would they oppose something that improves rehabilitation and community safety? It makes no sense…

Travissi Gilbert Travissi Gilbert 9:56 pm 29 Mar 21

A reintegration centre does sound a bit Maoist

Richard Willcoxson Richard Willcoxson 8:44 pm 26 Mar 21

So the centre is in doubt based on rumours from the prisoners themselves?

Inca Serrated Inca Serrated 6:35 pm 26 Mar 21

A prison officer's union opposing a rehabilitative endeavour? Why is this not surprising?

consumeradvocatecanberra consumeradvocatecanberra 4:33 pm 26 Mar 21

Chrisin-you are right. This government are spending on folly projects and not doing what it is supposed to. Yet we keep[ on electing them, in part because of an ineffective Liberal party. Keep speaking out far and wide. We need more folk to speak. 50% voted for the tram, and similar not. However, if they knew the facts it would be 80% against the tram and 20% for. Trams don’t guarantee patronage. Quick, minimal stops, direct routes going where travellers want to go will get the Big Tick and it can be buses, trackless trams, tram bus or even tram, and depends on the scarce budget.

ChrisinTurner ChrisinTurner 3:26 pm 26 Mar 21

But we got a tram.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site