28 February 2025

Crossbenchers are not guaranteeing anything if there's a hung parliament

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
32
Australia coat of arms

The battle for the crossbenches of Federal Parliament is intensifying. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

MPs and senators in the current make-up of the Federal Parliament’s crossbenches are not inclined to enter into formal agreements with either side of politics if the imminent election results in a hung parliament.

And according to some third-party groups aiming to influence the outcome of the election, that’s enough reason not to re-elect them or any other independents and minor parties.

Two media reports published Friday (28 February), one by the ABC and the other by Guardian Australia, reveal just how sharply the battle for power is escalating outside of the major parties.

If neither Labor nor the Coalition gain enough votes in their own right to form majority government, they will each seek to lead a minority government with the support of enough crossbench MPs to get them over the line with 76 votes in the House of Representatives.

But blanket support is not guaranteed, with the Greens and most independents in both the Reps and the Senate saying they would force negotiation with the major parties one bill at a time.

In the Lower House where government is formed, such an approach would prove extremely difficult for whichever party has a tenuous grip on the Treasury benches.

READ ALSO Coalition talks more about APS job cuts as election announcement gets closer

An investigation by the ABC shows all but two of the current 19 Lower House crossbenchers are open to forming formal agreements with whoever wins the highest number of seats.

The Greens would be open to an agreement with Labor, but not with the Coalition, but most of the others say it would be piecemeal negotiations rather than a blanket agreement.

Member for Goldstein Zoe Daniel told the ABC that such an approach would force greater accountability.

“I won’t be making any rigid deals with either of the major parties on how I will behave over the course of the parliament,” she said.

“Every piece of legislation, every policy will be treated on its merits, no matter who is in government, if I am lucky enough to be sitting on the crossbench.”

A similar sentiment was expressed by most of the current crossbenchers, with independent Andrew Wilkie – who helped Julia Gillard form a minority government – saying he had learned from his experience.

“When you have a formal agreement, even if that agreement only locks you in to supporting the government on confidence and for its budget, which ultimately was the only thing I was required to do in my deal with Julia Gillard, there’s still an unwritten understanding that you’re much closer to the government,” he said.

“They certainly pull you close. In some ways, you are kind of joining the tribe.

“It’s a very subtle sort of thing, and with the benefit of hindsight, I did lose a lot of freedom of manoeuvring back then.

“And I am quick to tell my crossbench colleagues when the agreement was torn up mid-way through my first time, I wasn’t part of any tribe.”

READ ALSO Treasurer and Treasury under fire over costing Opposition policy

The Guardian reports that third-party groups, who don’t necessarily field candidates but exert influence throughout campaigns, are preparing election material to say having more Greens and so-called Teals on the crossbench are a threat to Australia’s economic and social stability.

One flyer from the conservative group Better Australia boasts that it has influenced election outcomes in NSW and Queensland, and it is intent on ending Greens and Teal representation in the Federal Parliament.

“Better Australia is an independent grassroots initiative formed in response to widespread concerns from Australians of all walks of life,” a spokeswoman said.

“Better Australia is led by a broad coalition of Australians who believe that political representation should be based on integrity and action, not extremist or elite activism.”

Similar campaigns have been and are being organised by other groups, including one called Minority Impact Coalition.

There are currently a record number of crossbenchers in the House of Representatives – 19.

Independent influence has been on the rise for the past few elections, forcing the major parties to enter more deals over legislation, which the crossbench says has resulted in better outcomes for Australians.

Recent polling shows most of the current ones will be re-elected and that neither major party will secure enough votes to form majority government.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says Labor can and will win a majority second term.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton says if the Coalition wins far more seats than Labor but is still short of the magic 76 seats, then the crossbench should seriously consider giving him support to form government.

Join the conversation

32
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I need to know where you stand on some of these policy issues if you want my vote.

I was going to vote independant for ther first time this election but if you cant garantee where you stand i cant vote for you.

Looks like i will be voting for a major party again.

Stephen Saunders7:24 am 01 Mar 25

Here’s an idea. The woke cross-benchers could always follow the Oakeshott model. Give us a 17-minute lecture to drag out the cheap suspense, then side with Mr Albanese, because he grew up in a log cabin, and cares so very deeply about the less wealthy 75%. Not.

Or in other words, you’re (probably correctly) worried that Dutton won’t be able to make reasoned case as to why the independents following their electorates wishes should support him, so you’re going to whinge about it and say “woke” a lot.

Capital Retro3:50 pm 28 Feb 25

I would like you Chris to do a story on how you see things for Australia if Dutton wins a thumping majority.

@Capital Retro
He may not be the best journalist around, but, unlike you, I don’t think Johnson is into telling fairy tales, CR.

Capital Retro7:46 pm 28 Feb 25

I don’t care what his journalistic status is JS but it would be nice to read some non-left opinion for a change.
Also, why does he need you to think for him?

@Capital Retro
“be nice to read some non-left opinion for a change”
Such a shame your jaundiced perspective doesn’t allow you to actually absorb the contents of the article – but then again you are prone to fairy tales.

This article is about the very real possibility of independents and their potential impact on a hung parliament – no mention of their political leaning.

You however are engaging in fantasy and calling for comment on something nobody is predicting. Still you spend so much time absent from reality you may as well continue to inhabit that space.

PS I’m not thinking for Johnson just offering my opinion on the worth of perpetuating your fairy tale.

If ‘Better Australia’ group wants integrity and action rather than extremism or elite activism, they would logically oppose the LNP’s extremist views and elitist policies. They would not support tax cuts for the wealthy, public funding of private schools, bailouts for badly managed corporations but they would support helping the unemployed and underemployed get access to work. They would support public education.

They would support action against climate change and ongoing disasters that are exacerbating and costing us all in our day to day living including the cost of our food, insurance policies, our emergency services costs, our need to protect and lift up our citizens and neighbours who can no longer survive in their communities due to floods and fires.

Climate change isn’t real, and enough has been wasted on this chicken little syndrome. We could save more money by rounding up all the climate cultists and dropping them in the ocean a long way out to sea, which still hasn’t risen.

Better Australia is about as ironic as our conservatives calling themselves the “Liberal Party”. It’s Orwellian double speak and fools lap it up.

Ken M – I didn’t realise that you were a flat earther without the ability to understand the science. Sad.

Capital Retro11:07 am 01 Mar 25

If the earth isn’t flat, why do we use lasers and spirit levels?

LOL
I understand that the people saying things like “the science is settled” don’t understand science at all. Climate cultists are even more insufferable than flat earthers. You’re just not interested in even hearing anything that doesn’t fit your belief.

@Ken M
In a democratic society, even ignorant people have the right to be heard … it’s just that you seem to exercise that right more often, on matters for which you provide absolutely no supporting evidence whatsoever.

There are a multitude of peer reviewed (i.e. experts evaluating experts) studies to support the science of anthropogenic climate change. Similarly, multiple studies show that an overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that human activities are the primary driver of climate change.

As for the rising oceans? Again science assists us there, with studies similar to those refere3nced in this article:
https://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/is-sea-level-rise-exaggerated-ocean-fact-check/
from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (the first, of many, that came up in my google search), which blow your moronic claim out of the water – pun intended.

So, perhaps, instead of your parrot-like squawking that ‘climate change isn’t real’ or ‘the oceans aren’t rising’, you can point us to the evidence you have to support your denialism – such as a peer reviewed study.

In the expectation of absolutely nothing coherehent or rational on the subject from you, I’ll leave you to promote your democratic right to be ignorant.

@Capital Retro
Your comment suggests you may have been over imbibing a level of spirits, CR.

Labor also support the public funding of Private Schools. I’ve never understood the fuss about that. They don’t get anymore than Public schools and if they all closed down it would almost bankrupt the Government when they’re forced to build more schools.

Capital Retro, your comment is tangential.

Elf, in how many respects are you trying to be wrong in so few words?

JS, I just peer reviewed the studies cited by your article, and they are all wrong. Climate change is fake.

Ken M – And your qualifications are? Why anyone would believe your baseless claims I can’t imagine.

@Ken M
As expected, you reinforce your democratic right to be ignorant

Capital Retro8:16 am 02 Mar 25

Why, just cos you say so?

I have masters degrees in 2 STEM fields, psycho. I’ll wager that gives me more scientific qualifications than you and your cult mate JS combined.

Imagine scientific theory that is so infallibly true, that it needs a bunch of zealots to shout down any research that concludes anything but the approved narrative.

It’s a cult.

@Ken M
OK, if you say so.

However, it is surprising to see, that despite your professed teritary qualifications, you have continually demonstrated an inability to present evidence based arguments and/or reserach to support your position.

Do you expect your unsubstantiated pronouncements to go unchallenged, simply because you are (supposedly) “qualified” to speak on such matters?

Why would any intelligent independent give up their independence by aligning themselves with a party instead of representing their constituents on each and every issue?

They would have little to offer and virtually no power to influence much. Just look at the example of the previous Labor/Greens government in the ACT.

These ‘third party groups’ who oppose independents are seeking support for their own agendas and the status quo, rather than what’s good for Australia and Australians as a whole. Economic stability & certainty is the status quo and that’s not good for our future or that of our children, let alone for those who are currently being left behind.

We need to shake things up to improve our society instead of supporting its continuing deterioration via vested interests.

Better Australia sound like an astroturf initiative led by a broad coalition of corporate interests.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.