Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Buying off the plan?
View our developments

Dräger follies see alleged drink driver walked free

By johnboy 13 May 2010 33

From the Magistrate’s Court comes the intriguing tale of how Matthew Jon Windle hired a good lawyer to get off a drink driving charge.

It started with a red light run from Cooyong Street onto Northbourne in front of police. It followed a predictable path of slurred speech, reeking of alcohol, and some difficulty standing.

Then it all started to go wrong:

An analysis was subsequently carried out by Constable Dzido and the Drager Alcotest 7110 Mark V breath analysing instrument recorded that the defendant had a reading of 0.221 grams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood. A Section 41 Certificate (Exhibit A) was tendered without objection save Mr Pappas had raised, quite properly, very early in the proceedings that the defendant contested two facts:
(a) the Drager Alcotest 7110 Mark V was not an approved instrument; and,
(b) that Constable Dzido was not an approved operator.

It seems that the “a” in Drager has an umlaut. Because we are L33t we can write it like this: “Dräger”

But whomever drafted the Notifiable Instrument N12004-134 and shoved it under Bill Wood’s nose for signing was not L33t at all, and left out the umlauts.

Magistrate Cush in the end decided that this was being silly buggers, and who needs umlauts anyway. But then another case reared it’s head.

Carlos Gonzalez had a go at chucking out N12004-134 on the basis that it only approved the Drager as a screening device and not an analysis device. Something which so alarmed the ACT Government they put out a new instrument the same day the oversight was raised.

The instrument also cited the wrong section of the Act from which it is derived.

Magistrate Cush decided these problems too were silly buggers.

But the matter of Constable Dzido not being approved as an operator a year and a half after he had completed the appropriate course was something the Magistrate could not overlook and so the repeat offending Matthew Windle with a reading of 0.221gm is still on our streets.

It’s a hell of a way to run a Territory.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
33 Responses to
Dräger follies see alleged drink driver walked free
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Queen_of_the_Bun 1:28 pm 14 Jan 14

carnardly said :

This gem has done it again – hit and run an old lollypop lady while he was texting.

Given his no prior convictions – cough… (albeit on a technicality) and his good character he got off fairly lightly i reckon.

6 months in the big house and no licence for a few years.

He should’ve been off the road well before this though.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/man-jailed-for-running-into-lollipop-lady-while-using-phone-20131202-2yljl.html

And now look what’s ahppened to the lollipop lady – poor woman.
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/lollipop-lady-witnessed-husband-die-in-oakleigh-crash-20140114-30rov.html

CraigT 8:22 pm 04 Dec 13

Who cares if the law is too poorly written to result in a convixtion in what is otherwise an open and shut case?
Far more importantly, we have homosexual marriage!!!!

Ben_Dover 6:51 pm 04 Dec 13

Blen_Carmichael said :

Incidentally, don’t think there’s too much gnashing of teeth at the police station over the result. They’re probably shrugging their shoulders and saying “what goes around comes around.”

Yes, this oaf came around again..


Ms Parsons, 62, sustained a broken pelvis, broken ribs and tissue damage

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/man-jailed-for-running-into-lollipop-lady-while-using-phone-20131202-2yljl.html

I hope he gets royally reamed while in jail.

Blen_Carmichael 6:10 pm 04 Dec 13

Fair dinkum, I’m the first to have a shot at defence lawyers for not playing by the rules, but this backlash is unwarranted. Yes, by all means nod the head if you did the crime and feel you that you must atone by pleading guilty – you will get points for doing so. But if you there’s a loophole in there and you want to give it a run, do so. It keeps the coppers on their toes, and that’s not a bad thing.

Incidentally, don’t think there’s too much gnashing of teeth at the police station over the result. They’re probably shrugging their shoulders and saying “what goes around comes around.”

carnardly 5:36 pm 04 Dec 13

Ben – I remember one who advertises his phone number as something like 1800-drinkdrive but have no idea who it is.

but why should someone try to get off? They did the crime, let em do the time – maybe just maybe next time they might think of us poor innocents before they get behind the wheel 3/4 pished…

peitab 1:55 pm 04 Dec 13

The bad guys aren’t the lawyers or the bureaucrats (although they didn’t help); it’s the guy who committed the crime the first place, and then didn’t have the guts to stand up and say “I did wrong, I’ll accept the consequences”.

Ben_Dover 1:17 pm 04 Dec 13

Wasn’t there a lawyer who used to boast about his getting a drunk driver off due to the missing umlat?

I hope he gets hit and run by a drunkard too.

carnardly 12:15 pm 04 Dec 13

This gem has done it again – hit and run an old lollypop lady while he was texting.

Given his no prior convictions – cough… (albeit on a technicality) and his good character he got off fairly lightly i reckon.

6 months in the big house and no licence for a few years.

He should’ve been off the road well before this though.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/man-jailed-for-running-into-lollipop-lady-while-using-phone-20131202-2yljl.html

Misseur Bernard 8:42 pm 16 May 10

I agree with Misseur Radar, this fellow Pappas obviously has the talent to be appointed to the highest court in your land. In my home country of France he would go to the very top, and in the United States I’m sure he would make Supreme Court nominee – if it weren’t for his appalling haircuts

Radar 5:06 pm 15 May 10

Pork Hunt said:

“I can’t wait for the howls of derision if and when Pappas is appointed an ACT Magistrate…”

I think Pappas is too good for that – surely he should be Chief Justice?

Tooks 11:03 am 15 May 10

Thankfully, this ‘man’ was pulled over when he was. Who knows what might’ve happened if he kept going through the next red traffic light.

I only hope this grub learned a lesson – other than the fact expensive lawyers can get you off on a technicality.

bd84 9:43 pm 14 May 10

The law should not be taking into account administrative errors in making judgements, there are too many cases thrown out for such stupid reasons.

It was sensible to throw out the spelling mistake argument, but if the law worked correctly, the court should not be taking into account a procedural error in filing a document, rather that the officer had been fully and properly trained in the use of the device, therefore making his use of the device proper. The only excuse that should be accepted is if the officer was not properly trained or if the system was misused.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site