Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

ELK tells the pokies where to go

By johnboy 27 March 2013 33

pokies

Local street art legend ELK has been given a free kick by the makers of poker machines Aristocrat entertainment.

And he’s duly dispatched them through the posts.

Hope he didn’t need the $9,500.

(you can click through the image for a zoomable version)

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
33 Responses to
ELK tells the pokies where to go
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Masquara 5:02 pm 29 Mar 13

poetix said :

Masquara said :

johnboy said :

Gentleman I’m just going to call this particular spat quits.

ELK is by any definition a legitimate artist and is not required to justify his entire life history.

Agreed – and you only have to look outside IGA Lyneham and see the work that has gone into livening up a massive wall, to see the value of street art.

That was done at the Party at the Shops. So Masquara is praising a Centenary event! Who’d have thunk it?

As to ELK, I like the way he makes me see very familiar buildings differently each time he creates new images. Makes you wake up!

I have no quibble with good Centenary events, Poetix.

poetix 3:06 pm 29 Mar 13

Masquara said :

johnboy said :

Gentleman I’m just going to call this particular spat quits.

ELK is by any definition a legitimate artist and is not required to justify his entire life history.

Agreed – and you only have to look outside IGA Lyneham and see the work that has gone into livening up a massive wall, to see the value of street art.

That was done at the Party at the Shops. So Masquara is praising a Centenary event! Who’d have thunk it?

As to ELK, I like the way he makes me see very familiar buildings differently each time he creates new images. Makes you wake up!

Masquara 12:36 pm 29 Mar 13

johnboy said :

Gentleman I’m just going to call this particular spat quits.

ELK is by any definition a legitimate artist and is not required to justify his entire life history.

Agreed – and you only have to look outside IGA Lyneham and see the work that has gone into livening up a massive wall, to see the value of street art.

E.L.K 11:45 am 29 Mar 13

bigfeet said :

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

So basically the story is this:

“Local vandal is concerned about the community…when it suits him”

Vandal? I’ve got a piece in the National Portrait Gallery, dickhead.

So? That doesn’t mean that you haven’t vandalised or defaced public property.

Isn’t this your work? Did you get permission to deface this sign? I’m sure there are countless other examples.

http://the-riotact.com/monkey-jesus-street-art/57064

Thats actually one of my stickers, that I give away for free on my facebook page, to people that like me, at my own expense. I didn’t put that sticker on that sign, but feel free to take it off if your offended by this horrible display of vandalism.

Fine, I am quite willing to retract if you can honestly say that you have never done any of your art on public or private property without the consent of the owner. If you have…ever…no matter how good it is…it is still vandalism.

I have enough respect and commonsense not to paint on private property without permission, public property on the otherhand is merely a canvas to share my artwork with the wider public, which the majority of appreciate and encourage (except for a few trolls that are still living in the dark ages)

    johnboy 11:49 am 29 Mar 13

    Gentleman I’m just going to call this particular spat quits.

    ELK is by any definition a legitimate artist and is not required to justify his entire life history.

bigfeet 11:23 am 29 Mar 13

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

So basically the story is this:

“Local vandal is concerned about the community…when it suits him”

Vandal? I’ve got a piece in the National Portrait Gallery, dickhead.

So? That doesn’t mean that you haven’t vandalised or defaced public property.

Isn’t this your work? Did you get permission to deface this sign? I’m sure there are countless other examples.

http://the-riotact.com/monkey-jesus-street-art/57064

Thats actually one of my stickers, that I give away for free on my facebook page, to people that like me, at my own expense. I didn’t put that sticker on that sign, but feel free to take it off if your offended by this horrible display of vandalism.

Fine, I am quite willing to retract if you can honestly say that you have never done any of your art on public or private property without the consent of the owner. If you have…ever…no matter how good it is…it is still vandalism.

E.L.K 10:59 am 29 Mar 13

bigfeet said :

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

So basically the story is this:

“Local vandal is concerned about the community…when it suits him”

Vandal? I’ve got a piece in the National Portrait Gallery, dickhead.

So? That doesn’t mean that you haven’t vandalised or defaced public property.

Isn’t this your work? Did you get permission to deface this sign? I’m sure there are countless other examples.

http://the-riotact.com/monkey-jesus-street-art/57064

Thats actually one of my stickers, that I give away for free on my facebook page, to people that like me, at my own expense. I didn’t put that sticker on that sign, but feel free to take it off if your offended by this horrible display of vandalism.

bearlikesbeer 10:01 am 29 Mar 13

Was Luke the person who decided to share this email with the world? Or was it Janice?

bigfeet 9:20 am 29 Mar 13

E.L.K said :

bigfeet said :

So basically the story is this:

“Local vandal is concerned about the community…when it suits him”

Vandal? I’ve got a piece in the National Portrait Gallery, dickhead.

So? That doesn’t mean that you haven’t vandalised or defaced public property.

Isn’t this your work? Did you get permission to deface this sign? I’m sure there are countless other examples.

http://the-riotact.com/monkey-jesus-street-art/57064

Ko. 9:11 am 29 Mar 13

Mr Evil said :

So, someone who spends their time (occasionally?) defacing public property with their idea of ‘street art’ goes and tells a representative of a large company that legally provides licenced gaming machines to pubs and clubs (which in turn donate a large amount of their gaming money to a number of worthwhile charities) that they should be ashamed of themselves, and to also take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror?

Mmm, interesting………..

hah. yep. The Pokies companies are the moral entity in this debate.

E.L.K 11:49 pm 28 Mar 13

RadioVK said :

ELK, While I agree with your sentiments on poker machines entirely, there was no need to attack the sender of the email personally. All you have done is to make yourself look a little childish.

Saying “no, I’m not interested, and for these reasons” would have been far more grown up.

The best advice I can give you is go home tonight and take a very good look in the mirror…

In my defence, that was not an attack. It may have been highly patronising, but not rude.

E.L.K 11:47 pm 28 Mar 13

Mr Evil said :

So, someone who spends their time (occasionally?) defacing public property with their idea of ‘street art’ goes and tells a representative of a large company that legally provides licenced gaming machines to pubs and clubs (which in turn donate a large amount of their gaming money to a number of worthwhile charities) that they should be ashamed of themselves, and to also take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror?

Mmm, interesting………..

Defacing public property? do your homework, dickhead.

E.L.K 11:46 pm 28 Mar 13

bigfeet said :

So basically the story is this:

“Local vandal is concerned about the community…when it suits him”

Vandal? I’ve got a piece in the National Portrait Gallery, dickhead.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site