4 September 2024

High Court challenge to CFMEU administration

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
3
High Court of Australia

The CFMEU old guard has mounted a High Court challenge over their removal. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Sacked CFMEU bosses have taken their plight to the High Court, lodging a challenge to the union’s forced administration, saying it is unconstitutional.

But the Federal Government, which rushed through laws to force the construction arm of all branches of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union into administration, has dismissed the challenge as an expected move.

Action against the union followed media reports alleging bullying, intimidation and criminal behaviour by some CFMEU officials.

A number of Labor governments acted swiftly to suspend the party’s affiliation with the construction division of the union and to expel some members.

The union’s former Victorian secretary, John Setka, stepped down from the role in July. He was expelled from the Labor Party in 2019.

All branches of the union were forced into administration late last month (August) at the direction of Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus, who appointed Melbourne lawyer Mark Irving as the union’s administrator.

READ ALSO CPSU reform group attacks Labor over CFMEU administration

“I have decided it is in the public interest, having regard to the parliament’s intention in enacting the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, to place the Construction and General Division of the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union and all of its branches – including the WA and ACT branches – into administration,” the Attorney-General said.

“I have determined a written scheme of administration, and the general manager of the Fair Work Commission has appointed Mr Mark Irving KC as the administrator. I have also contacted Mr Irving to notify him of his appointment.

“The scheme of administration of the Construction and General Division of the CFMEU takes effect immediately.

“I have made this decision under section 323B of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009, having been authorised to do so by the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations [Murray Watt].”

The action sparked protest rallies in the tens of thousands around the country expressing support for the CFMEU’s rank-and-file membership.

On Tuesday (3 September), former CFMEU national president Jade Ingham announced that a High Court challenge had been filed and that a crowdfunding campaign had been launched to help fund it.

“The most important people in this are the members of the CFMEU whose voices have been excluded,” he said.

“Members are furious about their union being taken away from them. Their union has been stolen from them.

“This is active treachery and class warfare against the working class in this country from the state and federal governments.

“Union bashing never worked for the Tories, so why did Labor think it would work for them? CFMEU members will have their voices heard.”

READ ALSO Awards finalist breaks through ‘boys club’ to help build better future for women in construction

Speaking from Brisbane, Mr Ingham said numerous other unions have already pledged financial support.

“There is significant money that’s pouring in, and not just money, but support as well,” he said.

“They understand that this is not just about the CFMEU unit.

“This is a very dangerous precedent to set, and what the Labor Party have done is given a blueprint to the conservatives of this country to attack trade unions.”

The challenge was lodged by the CFMEU’s former Queensland secretary, Michael Ravbar, with Sydney silk Bret Walker SC to head a team of barristers on the case.

But Anthony Albanese, who, while still opposition leader, had Mr Setka kicked out of the Labor Party, says the challenge was expected.

“Surprise, surprise. John Setka took our entire national executive to court over him being expelled from the Labor Party,” the Prime Minister said.

“That’s fully expected. We will stand by our position and the government’s position will be defended.”

When announcing the legislation to force an administrator in the union, Mr Watt said the bill was designed to withstand a legal challenge from the bosses who were stood down.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
William Teach8:42 pm 04 Sep 24

So far they haven’t published solid evidence of actual crimes other than organising unprotected industrial action (and even the Libs couldn’t find enough to charge them in their inquiry). For the ALP that’s already under pressure from the left and can’t move right because of the threat of more teals filling that space, prosecuting the CFMEU’s leadership for unprotected industrial action would be a serious own goal: if they lose they look stupid and vindictive, if they win it will mark the complete victory of the DLP and CSSM over the ACTU/ALP part of the labour movement and might encourage other radical unions to affiliate to the greens or a new left party.

Start charging the people involved in criminal activity that caused the whole issue then, and watch the rodents scurry off.

William Teach8:31 pm 04 Sep 24

The Libs didn’t manage to find any evidence they could use for a prosecution when they had their Royal Commission, and there’s a lot of dodgy associations and accusations people won’t put their name to but the only specific offences there’s decent (published) evidence of relates to unprotected industrial action

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.