19 April 2023

Home Affairs broke the law in obeying ministerial instructions over visas, High Court rules

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
Home affairs.

By asking the Department of Home Affairs not to refer certain visa applications to him, then-Minister Peter Dutton was wrongly delegating power to the department. Photo: Google.

The High Court has issued the Department of Home Affairs a wake-up call over its use of the so-called ‘God powers’ Peter Dutton exploited, allowing ministerial intervention in the issue of non-citizen visas.

In a ruling last week (12 April), the court found the department had flouted the Migration Act by overstepping executive power at the direction of Mr Dutton.

As immigration minister in 2016, Mr Dutton issued guidelines on how ministerial intervention should be managed.

Within those guidelines was the direction that departmental officers should weed out what they considered non-viable applications for ministerial intervention before they reached the minister.

The guidelines were followed by the department, apparently without questioning whether they fell within the law.

The problem is the Act states that these specific ministerial powers cannot be delegated.

READ ALSO Inquiry into National Mental Health Commission, CEO stood aside

The powers are non-reviewable, non-compellable and non-delegable – thus the ‘God powers’ title – and are only to be used in the public or national interest.

In an appeal hearing of the Davis v Minister for Immigration case, the High Court found that by asking the department not to refer certain applications to him, the minister was wrongly delegating the power.

But the department was nonetheless compliant with Mr Dutton’s directions.

“The 2016 ministerial instructions relevantly instructed departmental officers not to refer a request to exercise the power conferred by s 351 of the Act to a minister in any case which departmental officers assessed not to ‘have unique or exceptional circumstances’,” the court stated.

“Each departmental decision not to refer turned on the departmental officer assessing the case in relation to which the request was made not to meet that criterion for referral.”

In other words, Mr Dutton had instructed the department to do what the law says only he as minister could do – and the department did it.

“The court found that the broad criterion of ‘unique or exceptional circumstances’ in the ministerial instructions required, in effect, a departmental officer to evaluate the public interest and make a decision entrusted exclusively to the minister,” the High Court states.

“For that reason, the ministerial instructions exceeded the limitation imposed by s 351(3) on the executive power of the Commonwealth.

“The decisions made in purported compliance with the ministerial instructions were therefore unlawful.”

READ ALSO Wong shows her mettle, and not just on Keating

This rarely used provision for ministerial intervention in cases where visas are refused or cancelled reached notoriety after Mr Dutton reversed visa cancellations for two young tourists planning to work as au pair in 2015, one of them for his former Queensland police colleagues.

That same year he intervened in another au pair case after then AFL CEO Gillon McLachlan raised the issue on behalf of a relative.

The powers were subsequently used last year by the Albanese government to grant the Murugappan family of Biloela in regional Queensland permanent residence.

Mr Dutton’s 2016 guidelines replaced those put in place in 2009 by Labor’s former immigration minister Chris Evans.

Whether the earlier guidelines breached the limits of executive power is now being investigated by the department, which is seeking legal advice.

READ ALSO Witness J sentence decision finally released, but secrecy remains due to numerous redactions

The ruling has possible implications for many other ministerial decisions beyond the use of s 351, taken by both Coalition and Labor governments.

Immigration Minister Andrew Giles has described the decision as “very substantial” and one that is being taken seriously by the current government.

“We will be carefully considering the decision, taking advice on it and responding having done so,” Mr Giles said.

“That’s the responsible course of action. It’s the only course of action.”

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

So the government department is in trouble for being efficent with tax payer monies?

Surely as the minster he could just blindly decline any list of applicants without reviewing them.

Surely the ‘god’ power is a ‘god’ power. There is no actual requirement to find anything of interest at all before declining. If they followed the rules the department would just over the records and say to the minster, i don’t believe these will pass. The minster would be thanks for the time, and declare that none of them pass and still be within the rules.

However, what was done is just eliminate the tick box step for inefficency?

Maybe if this is an issue we should review the requiments for the god power, and make it a bit more defined as what is pass fail.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.