Libs call on Stanhope to lead poverty taskforce

Ian Bushnell 1 September 2020 4
Former ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope

Former ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope: will he take on the role? File photo.

The ACT’s main political parties have to gone to war over how to handle poverty in the national capital, with the Canberra Liberals calling on former Labor Chief Minister Jon Stanhope to head its proposed poverty taskforce and Chief Minister Andrew Barr ridiculing the proposal and attacking his opponents’ four-year rates freeze.

Opposition Leader Alistair Coe said he had written to Mr Stanhope asking that he consider leading the taskforce under a Liberal Government but he was still waiting for a reply.

“Given Mr Stanhope’s extensive experience in government and strong links to the community, he is well placed to select members of the team and lead the task group’s strategy,” Mr Coe said.

“Mr Stanhope is widely respected and his commitment to social justice is well known.”

Mr Stanhope is also a trenchant critic of the Barr Government, but his views have been dismissed by the incumbent Chief Minister as out of touch.

Comment was sought from Mr Stanhope.

Mr Coe said the taskforce, which the ACT Council of Social Services has backed, was needed because poverty in Canberra was hidden and a comprehensive strategy was required to deal with its causes and symptoms.

But Mr Barr says the answer is already clear from the Commonwealth’s raising of the Newstart rate for its JobSeeker program during the pandemic.

”We don’t need a taskforce, we need action, and we know exactly what the actions are to raise people’s incomes,” he said.

”That’s what’s needed, not another commission of inquiry that will spend years coming to exactly the same conclusion.”

Mr Coe says poverty is not as obvious or visible in Canberra as other cities, but according to ACTCOSS there are 37,000 people and 6000 children in low-income households and 26,000 living below the poverty line in the ACT.

He says the taskforce would work with the community sector, government, businesses and other stakeholders and develop recommendations for responding to the growing challenge.

Mr Coe said Labor and the increasing cost of living had made Canberra unaffordable for many.

He says the latest rental affordability report from Anglicare, which shows that there are no properties in the ACT someone on income support could afford to rent, reinforced the need for a taskforce.

Mr Barr countered that new research from the ANU showed that the increased income supports during the pandemic had lifted significantly more Canberrans out of poverty and housing stress.

He said it was the single most effective measure to reduce poverty over the past six months and, when combined with the ACT’s concessions, had resulted in the most significant reduction in poverty in modern Australian history.

But he feared for those low-income people if the Commonwealth decided to scale back JobSeeker payments at the end of the month.

”The issue is income support, and living on $40 a day is not possible. That’s why the rate has to rise,” he said.

Mr Barr said the ACT did what it could but he laid the blame for poverty at the Commonwealth’s feet as it was responsible for the Newstart rate.

Canberra Liberals leader Alistair Coe says Labor either doesn’t know how to address poverty or is negligent. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

But Mr Coe said after 19 years in power Labor did not know how to address poverty in the ACT.

”If they do, then they are being negligent because they are not putting in place strategies that were working,” he said.

He would not say whether he backed raising the level of Newstart payments, preferring to focus on expenses in the ACT such as housing, particularly for the working poor who do not qualify for public housing.

Mr Barr also questioned the Liberals’ priorities for making their rates freeze central to their election campaign.

“Those [low-income] people are supported through public housing, free public education, free public health and through the range of other community services that the ACT government funds and what does Alistair Coe want to do? He wants to cut the resources of government to help those people,” he said.

Mr Barr said Mr Coe had not clarified how he would pay for the rate freeze, which he said would benefit the richest Canberrans.

”His stated position is to collect less revenue and we know where that revenue mostly comes from – it’s high-income earners, the top 20 per cent, the richest Canberrans, and it’s that money that is then redirected to support the poorest Canberrans.

”So you cannot be serious about a response to poverty if your objective is to deliver tax cuts amongst the richest Canberrans.”

Mr Coe again would not spell out how his rates freeze would work or whether he would do the same for business but said retaining more households and businesses in the ACT instead of losing them across the border would boost growth.

He was unable to supply actual data to support his claims that significant numbers were leaving the ACT due to high costs.

ACTCOSS CEO Dr Emma Campbell agreed that poverty was masked in Canberra and said any inquiry must conduct a full analysis to understand Canberra’s demographic changes, increasing complexity of needs and the changed Canberra geography that has led to gaps in service provision for many vulnerable people.

The leaders will do battle over social policy tomorrow when ACTCOSS will host the first Election Leaders Forum at Hotel Realm, which will be steamed online.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
4 Responses to Libs call on Stanhope to lead poverty taskforce
Filter
Order
Acton Acton 7:00 am 02 Sep 20

Smart move but better still if Jon Stanhope could be persuaded by a desperate electorate to reenter politics and save Canberra from another four long miserable years of Barr. Stanhope would win a seat either as an independent, or leading Labor, or even in with the Liberals. Stranger things have happened.

sps179 sps179 6:37 am 02 Sep 20

Oh please, Jon, make my day. Keep giving satire a hiding. No question, ACT Libs want to cure poverty. Blessed with 100% hindsight on urban budgets and urban transits, no question, you’re their man.

HiddenDragon HiddenDragon 7:12 pm 01 Sep 20

”The issue is income support, and living on $40 a day is not possible. That’s why the rate has to rise,” he said.

Mr Barr said the ACT did what it could but he laid the blame for poverty at the Commonwealth’s feet as it was responsible for the Newstart rate.”

Which completely ignores the issue of the working poor (including self-employed and small business people), as well as people living on other Commonwealth benefits which have no prospect of being increased beyond periodic indexation.

There’s two sides to a ledger – what comes in and what goes out. State and Territory governments can’t do much about incomes for people not on their payrolls, but they have more influence than they sometimes like to admit over living costs – much more, in fact.

    chewy14 chewy14 1:20 pm 02 Sep 20

    I’m unsure how you think the local ACT government can greatly impact the living costs of residents compared to other wider economic factors?

    Whilst they could definitely be far more efficient, it’s not like they are a major drain on the finances of the working poor or other welfare recipients.

    The government only receives around 35% of its revenue from its own taxation base. The rest comes from GST, federal grants etc.

    Of that amount, ~25% comes from payroll tax, which are only paid by larger businesses. The threshold is $2million per annum, so not your working poor businessperson or welfare recipient.

    Another ~30% comes from residential rates and stamp duties, with the vast majority of those funds being paid by wealthier people.

    Commercial rates and stamp duties are another ~15% and also very progressive by definition in who’s paying them.

    Land tax is another 7.5% and paid by investors, who are also almost by definition not poor.

    Car rego and other levies add a bit more but mostly go straight back into service delivery in those areas.

    So how exactly do you think the local government can markedly reduce the costs of living on poorer working people when they already don’t pay much towards the government coffers as it is?

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site