Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Excellence in Public Sector consulting

Man cleared of assaulting security guard

By aa 29 October 2007 5

According to this article on the ABC new’s website, the charges were dropped due to “inconsistencies in the evidence of all of the prosecution witnesses and doubted Connors was the correct defendant.”.

Video survalence and witnesses both said it was the person who did [was accused of doing perhaps? – ed] it.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
5 Responses to
Man cleared of assaulting security guard
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
aa 3:32 pm 29 Oct 07

The reason for the charges being dropped was apparently because the police to a while before questioning whitnesses. The video shows him hitting him, but wasn’t clear enough to show the glass.

el ......VNBerlinaV8 3:00 pm 29 Oct 07

Given the lack of detail in the original posting:

Police alleged Andrew John Connors, 28, attacked the off duty guard with a glass in December last year.

The security guard was rendered blind in one eye.

Magistrate Shane Madden said there were significant inconsistencies in the evidence of all of the prosecution witnesses and doubted Connors was the correct defendant.

Speaking of glassings, what the fsck is wrong with people? A young gent I know suffered an unprovoked attack with a stein glass on his way out of Octoberfest (smashed over head than stabbed around the eye and face area) – he required plastic surgery in the following days.

jono1 11:39 am 29 Oct 07

I’m sorry, I don’t mean to be a pedantic grammar nazi…Well, OK, maybe I do.

new’s?? This is a new low.

Heavs 11:22 am 29 Oct 07

Op is wrong. Video evidence showed nothing.

RandomGit 9:14 am 29 Oct 07

You’ll have to source the info in the last sentence in order for it to hold any weight with us kangaroos.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | | |

Search across the site