2 November 2022

More public servants asking for reviews of promotion decisions

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
Carton depicting favouritism

More public servants are asking for merit reviews and 12 promotion decisions were overturned. Photo: File.

Almost 1000 Commonwealth public servants asked for official reviews of workplace decisions affecting their employment in the last financial year.

Most applicants were seeking reviews of adverse promotion decisions made against them.

The Merit Protection Commissioner’s annual report for 2021-22 was recently tabled in the Federal Parliament, showing its reviews under the Review of Action Scheme.

Across the Australian Public Service, 996 employees sought merits reviews over the 12-month period, a rise from 746 the previous year.

In total, 323 merits reviews were conducted.

Merit reviews are for decisions that affect APS employment, such as promotion or workplace decisions.

Of the 996 applicants, only 130 covered a range of workplace decisions other than promotion decisions.

The top four agencies with staff asking for merit reviews of promotion decisions were Services Australia, the ATO, Home Affairs and the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Merit Protection Commissioner Linda Waugh said her office was proud to independently support an APS underpinned by merit, integrity, accountability and transparency.

“In addition to meeting these core objectives, my office also discovered the [Review of Actions] scheme can detect unintentional issues with the application of the merit principle,” Ms Waugh said.

“This often applied in newly designed selection processes that involved artificial intelligence (AI) and automated technologies. This led to several recruitment decisions being overturned by the MPC.

“As a result, the MPC sponsored an APS graduate project to design guidance for APS agencies to use AI and automated technologies selection assessment tools that follow the merit principle.”

READ ALSO More staff for Services Australia to deal with natural disaster relief

The annual report highlights the key achievements for the last financial year, which include increased engagement from the MPC with key stakeholders, and delivering more resources to both employees and agencies. This was achieved by providing more training and information sessions and enhancing the commission’s website content.

The MPC appears to have effectively managed the challenge of a surge in applications for promotion review applications.

The report shows it met its deadlines in more than 80 per cent of workplace decision reviews and 83 per cent of reviews of promotion decisions.

“One important review function that saw increased utility in 2021–22 was for promotion reviews,” Ms Waugh writes in the foreword to her report.

“Limited to promotions up to APS 6 level, this function allows an APS employee to seek an independent merits review of a promotion they applied for and missed out on.

“It can only be exercised when another APS employee won the role, and the review is solely to assess who had the most merit for the advertised job.

“This type of review was designed to assure staff and senior leaders that merit forms the basis of APS promotions and to prevent nepotism and cronyism.”

During 2021-22, the MPC discovered that the scheme could also detect unintentional issues with applying the merit principle in newly designed selection processes.

The Commissioner pointed out that this led to a number of recruitment decisions being overturned.

“In 2021-22, Promotion Review Committees overturned 4.46 per cent of promotion decisions reviewed,” she said.

“This was significantly higher than the 0.66 per cent in the preceding year. Overall, 12 promotion decisions were overturned.”

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
William Newby6:59 pm 02 Nov 22

The process is a complete crock!
Most applications these days are supported by a cover letter addressing key criteria, most of these letters are written or co-written by a consultant at $1,600/hr (thanks tax payers), and from this stack of basically identical applications you grant a select lucky few a 30min interview where you past three years work means nothing at all, your entire career and potential promotion comes down to a 30min interview where you must talk in an almost code type language using as many buz words as possible, but being ever so careful not to use plain English that is easy to follow.
Then three months later you are advised you were unsuccessful because you didn’t elaborate on XYZ.
Wait another three years, get an interview, cover XYZ in great detail and then be told you were unsuccessful because you need more ABC?!?

The process is a complete joke, everyone knows it, know one does anything about it. Merrit has nothing to do with it, the entire process is highly subjective.

In all seriousness meeting basic key criteria, and then entering a raffle would be a more genuine process!

Pretty self straight forward once you understand what the panel is looking for. Just combine the ILS with the STAR method sign posting with the buzz words to make it easy for the person reviewing your application. In the interview have some dot points, and the ILS in front of you. If you notice yourself waffling pull yourself back to answering the question. If the panel isn’t writing anything down, your not saying anything of substance. If your capable to do the job don’t need a ‘$1,600/hr consultant’. If the panel is quality they see through those form letters any way.

Promotion is similar to smokng marijuana, the harder you suck the higher you get. Having a good sponsor also helps.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.