19 December 2024

Brace for disruption: Light rail construction to start in February

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
92
light rail

An aerial view of what light rail Stage 2A will look like when completed in 2028. Image: ACT Government.

Construction of light rail Stage 2A to Commonwealth Park will start in early February, bringing traffic and pedestrian disruptions to City West.

Infrastructure Canberra says that as the project to create a level intersection at London Circuit and Commonwealth Avenue is entering its final stages, Canberra Metro is preparing to begin work on the 1.7 km extension along London Circuit west and Commonwealth Avenue.

From early February, fencing will go up around London Circuit west, between Northbourne Avenue and Edinburgh Avenue, and the street will be cleared of features such as bike racks, water fountains, park benches, light poles and public art.

READ ALSO Low-density housing slump: Here’s what ACT Government should do, says HIA

A number of trees along London Circuit west and Commonwealth Avenue will be removed, but more than twice as many new mature trees will be planted.

In-ground utilities will also be removed and relocated.

Site establishment will be done under the Parkes Way bridge to aid future works, and utilities work will be undertaken south of the lake at King Edward Terrace.

Sections of London Circuit west will be closed to motorists and on-road cyclists between Northbourne Avenue and Edinburgh Avenue. Parts of London Circuit will be re-opened as they are completed to maintain local access through the area.

Customers and suppliers will still be able to access businesses along London Circuit, and signs will be erected to assist them, visitors and residents.

Managing this will be a challenge for the project, but the government believes lessons from the Stage 1 build, when businesses were disrupted and lost trade, have been learned.

Motorists and cyclists will still be able to enter Knowles Place north and Odgers Lane, and pedestrian and wheelchair users will still be able to move along and across London Circuit.

Next month, a new construction compound will be established on the corner of London Circuit and Constitution Avenue in the current City Hill car park. It will join those already established at Acton Waterfront and City West.

In February, another compound will be established on Flynn Drive West, in the cloverleaf next to Albert Hall.

The light rail extension from Alinga Street will include three new stops at Edinburgh Avenue, City South and Commonwealth Park.

The project will not have overhead wires like Stage 1 from Gungahlin to the City as the light rail vehicles will be fitted with batteries.

Sections of the tracks will sit on a green bed and a new bridge will be built across Parkes Way.

There will also be two new sets of traffic lights on London Circuit at West Row and University Avenue.

READ ALSO Sustainability is no longer just a competitive edge – it’s a crucial part of life for every business

The $577 million project is expected to be completed in 2028. It will provide city-goers with greater access to City West, the ANU, New Acton, Commonwealth Park and Lake Burley Griffin, including the Acton Waterfront, where a new public park and housing will be built.

The ACT and Federal Governments are jointly funding it, with the Commonwealth contributing $344 million overall.

Infrastructure Canberra says more details on traffic movements and construction staging will be available early in the new year.

To stay updated, visit Built For CBR.

Join the conversation

92
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Frank Ensence5:21 pm 23 Dec 24

Unfortunately the light rail debacle is irretrievable and it’s the ratepayers left holding the can.

Or enjoying a century worth of return on investment

Capital Retro10:21 am 24 Dec 24

You sound like Klaus Schwab from the WEF, PlainView.
“You will have nothing but you will be happy”

Plainview,
when the economic assessments show a cost benefit ratio of less than 1, not much “return on investment” occurring.

what is the return on investment. It will never return a profit. no public transport system does. instead it will leave us in more and more debt and rates will increase to pay back debt.

……debt and rates and rents.

HiddenDragon8:40 pm 22 Dec 24

For the present and the foreseeable future, light rail for Canberra is essentially a faith-based initiative – it does not need to pass any sort of plausible cost-benefit analysis because it is about far more important tenets of the progressive belief system, including the virtues of publicly financed collectivism (vs the wanton sinfulness of privately owned individualism), environmentalist virtue signalling and the countless blessings of urban densification.

To the extent that the last few ACT elections have been about light rail, they have been re-runs of religious debates and controversies of much earlier times, with the notable irony of our local troop of studiously secular progressive politicians and their cheer squad deploying the tactics and some of the language of those times – setting up commitment to light rail as a test of faith and persecuting opponents and sceptics as deniers and heretics.

Suffering and sacrifice as proof and price of belief and piety is an element of many faith systems – it appeals to something within – so the disruptions announced above, and all that will follow in coming years in the long march to Woden, will actually be reassuring for light rail true believers as evidence that the eventual reward will surely be worth the many travails along the way.

For long-suffering Civic businesses which rely on discretionary spending by more than just the captive Civic demographic it will be a very testing time – with no great hope at the end of it all.

For the same price as light rail to Woden you could buy each family in town a brand new tesla.

Perhaps you could buy each family a Tesla, but that wouldn’t include the road space to drive them on or the parking at the other end. Our major roads in central Canberra are becoming increasingly congested as the population increases along with residential and workplace densities. We need a public transport right of way, like stage 1 of the light rail, along each major corridor. The right of way could also be a dedicated busway with a strengthened roadway for heavy articulated buses and user friendly stops and pedestrian connections, and signal priority. But as a busway becomes more sophisticated, the capital cost gets closer to light rail, while the operating cost of buses is always higher. For the north-south spine, between Gungahlin and Woden, light rail will be well over halfway there once stage 2A to Commonwealth Park is completed. It doesn’t make sense to change modes at this point. By all means make the case for busways for the remaining corridors, though by then I suspect the light rail will have bolted

Frank Ensence5:43 pm 23 Dec 24

Canberra’s millstone is irretrievable, and sadly, it’s the ratepayers left holding the can (again).

Don’t foget that to make the tram “viable” they will have to cancel the current Rapid Service. Otherwise thousands would never use the new tram.
Current Rapid Service from Woden to the City is 12 minutes travel time (mostly in a dedicated bus lane).
Proposed Tram travel time from Woden to the City is 26 minutes.
Why would you use the Tram if there is an electric bus service that takes less than half the time?

Since I retired a few years ago, I rarely go into Civic. A real dog’s breakfast for getting around. Plenty of other places to go to in the Satellite Towns of Canberra.

ChrisinTurner11:41 am 21 Dec 24

At about $1mil per metre, stage 2A must be the most expensive light rail route in the world.

Frank Ensence5:42 pm 23 Dec 24

Canberra’s millstone is irretrievable, and sadly, it’s the ratepayers left holding the can (again).

Is this meant to be a parody post. No you won’t have to change trams between Braddon and Commonwealth Park. The rails will remain standard gauge, while the trams will start relying on their batteries when the overhead wire ends. The trams recharge while running on the wired sections. Given fhis, we can assume the rest of your post is either a further attempt at a joke or just nonsense.

Phil Creaser5:51 pm 20 Dec 24

There is already considerable disruption with earthworks prior to the actual light rail track. Terrible project thanks to an incompetent Government who are continuing to waste taxpayers money.

Leon Arundell1:37 pm 20 Dec 24

Buses ceased to operate between Gungahlin and Civic when light rail started operating along that route. Will buses continue to operate between Civic and Commonwealth Park after light rail stage 2a starts operating?

There are 10 bus routes currently crossing Commonwealth Avenue bridge from the City and further North. None of the plans seem to allow for what would be a major interchange in Commonwealth Avenue. Further, requiring bus passengers for these services arriving/departing in the City to transfer to Light Rail for the short hop between Commonwealth Park and the City then change again, seems a step too far, even for Transport Canberra. So, in short, I think the buses can be expected to keep operating between the City and Commonwealth Park.

It seems to me that transfers at Commonwealth Park would mainly be for passengers too/from City West and points S of the Lake.

Implied in your question (and previous comments) is a continuing resentment to change, and the Light Rail. Perhaps its time to regard Light Rail as a fait accompli. Flogging a lost cause is energy sapping.

We need people to continue raising their concerns. Otherwise we may end up with a second white elephant travelling all the way to Woden.
You do realise that to catch the rail from Braddon to Commonwealth park you will have to change trams. Amazing but true. The rails / electricity supply don’t match.
Also.
If they continue to Woden, the Rapid Bus service (11 minutes) will be cancelled and replaced with light rail (26 minutes). Red Rapid from Gungahlin was cancelled.
All the bus services between the City and Woden that wind around through the adjacent suburbs will be cancelled as well. Every resident will be forced to catch a feeder bus back to Woden before transferring onto the rail. This happened throughout Gungahlin. Every suburb had a bus that wound through suburbs between The Marketplace and the City. All were cancelled and replaced with feeder buses taking us backwards (Palmerston, Franklin, Harrison, Crace, Gungahlin) before offloading the passengers who then walked 200m to board the light rail.
My commute to work used to be 22 minutes. Now it is 38 minutes. Only cost $1 Billion. I know of two people that stopped using public transport and bought a small car.
Don’t forget the additional traffic lights. Four extras along the route to the City when we were promised none.
How many traffic lights will they install along Adelaide Ave to allow passengers to safely cross the three lanes of traffic? Four? Five? Six?

It will be a fait acompli unless concerned citizens speak up. The people who catch public transport should be listened to. Not the multitude of Canberrans who say they want light rail but never catch public transport and probably never will.

“Implied in your question (and previous comments) is a continuing resentment to change, and the Light Rail. Perhaps its time to regard Light Rail as a fait accompli. Flogging a lost cause is energy sapping.”

When the evidence shows Light Rail is not viable in Canberra at present, why would you not continue to oppose it?

It’s not a resentment to change, it’s arguing against wasteful spending when far more efficient options are available to enhance public transport across the city, instead of one small component of it each decade.

And that more efficient option may well involve future upgrades to higher capacity modes like rail (light and heavy) when/if they are actually needed, which clearly isn’t now.

Even in your own comment you recognise the foolishness of completing Stage 2A independently when it achieves pretty much nothing from a transport perspective, with buses to continue on the same route.

Is this meant to be a parody post. No you won’t have to change trams between Braddon and Commonwealth Park. The rails won’t change from standard gauge, while the trams will start relying on their batteries when the overhead wire ends. The trams recharge while running on the wired sections. Given fhis, we can assume the rest of your post is either a further attempt at a joke or just nonsense.

No, I don’t realise the stage 1 and stage 1a are operationally incompatible. To claim that is just nonsense.
5 additional light rail vehicles (of the same make) have been purchased with 4 already here and one in service. The principal difference is that stage 2a includes wire free running, requiring the vehicles to have an on-board power source. The 5 are equipped for that. Their introduction into service is to enable the first 14 light rail vehicles to be progressively stood down for retrofitting with on-board power sources, thus providing an integrated homogeneous fleet suited to both stages 1 and 2a. For that matter, also stage 2b.
Repeating, it is time to accept stages 1 and 1a as a fait accompli.

We should build light rail on Mars to improve the commute times. Same logic.

What is your problem Leon Arundell or is it just you as an anti-rail proponent being given the opportunity to have another whinge? What reasoning would there be for buses to be operating along the light rail route from Gungahlin to Civic? The light rail frees up buses which used to clog the route and currently operate between Gungahlin and Belconnen via Kaleen, Giralang and McKellar.

As for bus services between Civic and Woden during the Commonwealth Park construction work, I would imagine they will be diverted as they currently are for the London Circuit phase. Maybe down Kings Avenue, onto King Edward and Queen Victoria Terraces diverting onto Commonwealth Avenue and then Woden as would seem logical.

My God do you naysayers against light rail ever stop whingeing!

Jack D,
Logically pointing out the flaws in the decision to move forward on an infrastructure project is the opposite of whinging, which more aptly describes your fact free comments on the issue.

Leon is pointing out the reduction in actual public transport options and the inefficiency of completing Stage 2A independently.

But of course if only he could see the “vision” just like you, the actual evidence wouldn’t matter.

There’s no changing of trams from Braddon to Commonwealth park. True. The power source changes from overhead wires to battery.

I stand corrected Dando. I didn’t realise the trams would recharge and operate on batteries. I guess thats what comes from “guessing” about the future operation. Apologies.
However evrything else I wrote has actually already happened.
Four extra traffic lights along the route. Fact
Cancelled Red Rapid service. Fact
Cancelled routes through the adjacent suburbs. Fact
Commute times nearly doubled. Fact
People buying small vehicles to avoid trams. Fact.

I stand corrected Roger. I didn’t realise the trams would recharge and operate on batteries. I guess thats what comes from “guessing” about the future operation. Apologies.
However evrything else I wrote has actually already happened.
Four extra traffic lights along the route. Fact
Cancelled Red Rapid service. Fact
Cancelled routes through the adjacent suburbs. Fact
Commute times nearly doubled. Fact
People buying small vehicles to avoid trams. Fact.

Grosby, perhaps you should find out a bit more about light rail before commenting with such certainty. Mixed-power operation using over-head power and batteries is well-established in Europe, and in Australia the Parramatta light rail that has just begun carrying passengers is powered in this way.
On your other ‘facts’:
– Four extra traffic lights along the route – if true, that’s fine by me if it gives priority to the trams and allows cross traffic and pedestrians to cross more easily.
– Cancelled Red Rapid service – of course, just as happens in other cities (see Sydney Metro). I don’t think public transport authorities should continue running alternative systems just to satisfy neoliberal obsessions about competition.
– Cancelled routes through adjacent suburbs – again this makes sense, provided there are well-timed connections outside peak periods (when the light rail isn’t running every 5-6 minutes).
– Commute times nearly doubled – evidence for this please. For those near the light rail, commute times have been cut, as light rail is faster and more reliable than buses stuck in traffic on Northbourne. For others, connections may need to be improved.
– People buying small vehicles to avoid trams – good for buyers, good for those they share the roads with, and good for the planet.

Capital Retro8:29 pm 23 Dec 24

You should understand Mark_Dando that Canberra has trams not light rail, the latter being terminology to describe a mass transit system in dedicated transport corridor not mixing with any other mode which doesn’t exist on Canberra.
The trams are part of the “urban renewal” concept which has developed in Canberra. We still have buses which is our public transport but even they won’t be able to operate efficiently when 80% of Canberrans are living in apartments with no car parking available and vehicle roads not being able to even deal with emergency services.
Just like in Europe!

Sadly Mark, these responses usually come from,
a) people who don’t catch public transport (I do)
b) people who live close to the light rail corridor (I don’t)
c) people who don’t live in Gungahlin.

Before they cancelled the bus services through the suburbs I timed my journey from Palmerston to Dickson. The clock started the moment I stepped on to the bus. Time 22 minutes.
After the buses were cancelled I timed the same journey. The clock started the moment I stepped on to the feeder service (that took me backwards to The Marketplace).Time 38 minutes. Fact.
The return journey took even longer because I had to wait an additional 12 minutes for the feeder service.

Are you aware that only 8% of Gungahlin residents live within 400m of the rail route? Lets presume that another 7% are prepared to walk up to a kilometer to the rail corridor.
That means 85% of Gungahlin residents are, at best, traveling the same amount of time to work or almost certainly worse off.
Not a problem for anybody that fits in to categories a, b or c

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.