8 February 2012

No kava for the multicultural festival

| johnboy
Join the conversation
39

The ABC has been worded up that kava has been banned from this year’s Multicultural Festival after the Thereapeutic Goods Administration rejected an application for an exemption.

Because too much multiculturalism would be a terrible thing at a multicultural festival.

Join the conversation

39
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

“I predict scenes of chaos, rampant crime and human misery. Possibly even complete societal collapse.”

No, according to the RA brains trust that’s down to allowing women segregated swimming sessions at a public pool.

Disposable said :

I saw on Win news tonight that there was a last minute exemption granted for Kava to be available at the Multicultural festival after all. It was a very short piece but Danielle Post said that the requirements were that the Kava was to be prepared in the traditional way.

I predict scenes of chaos, rampant crime and human misery. Possibly even complete societal collapse.

I saw on Win news tonight that there was a last minute exemption granted for Kava to be available at the Multicultural festival after all. It was a very short piece but Danielle Post said that the requirements were that the Kava was to be prepared in the traditional way.

Did anyone read the article? They are considering banning it. Nothing on the TGA website about it being banned, only restricted.

Jethro said :

It’s not illegal, but the importation of it is so limited that Polynesian communities are unable to access the amounts they require for cultural purposes.

Maybe the wowsers, above, could explain to our Islander friends that grinding up a bit of Kava root to make a very mildly sedative beverage is Bad, M’Kay, and they should instead grind up some coffeee beans to make a moderately powerful stimulant beverage instead, because that’s *not* Bad, M’Kay?

Anyway, back to cava. I really can’t see a problem with it, especially as it’s not illegal

It’s not illegal, but the importation of it is so limited that Polynesian communities are unable to access the amounts they require for cultural purposes.

As I said in an earlier post, the effects of this on their communities is actually quite negative. Since limitations on the importation of Kava have come into effect, the rate of alcohol abuse in Polynesian communities has increased substantially. This has brought with it a whole range of problems that didn’t exist before.

Also, as these communities find it more difficult to partake in their cultural practices, community elders have lost a good avenue through which they can connect with the younger generations. There is some evidence that this has also had some negative impacts in the Polynesian community.

buzz819 said :

Mate your an idiot, between this and your pro cannabis wanks you put up on here, the line is drawn in the sand, you can not drink it legally, you can not possess, grow or supply cannabis, you can not drink and drive, you can not murder people, you can not have too many persons in the one licensed premises. You don’t like the laws then buy an island and do what you want. Go back over to the Greens and focus on the big issues, like women only pools.

I fail to see how my opinions on either topic makes me an idiot. In both cases my opinions are based on a rational assessment of the evidence regarding the drugs’ effects and the impacts of government policy regarding their use.

I also fail to see why you think I should send myself into exile because of my views on these two topics. If we are going to start telling people to leave this country because of their opinions, may I suggest you move yourself to a country in which to live where freedom of speech is banned and people are punished for being critical of government policy.

Also, don’t try and support your argument by painting me as some pot-smoking idiot, or kava-loving fiend. As I stated in my comments on the cannabis threads, I don’t smoke the stuff. I have no interest in smoking the stuff. Consider me less ‘pro-cannabis’ and more ‘anti-prohibition’. Reread my comments on those threads. My opinions regarding cannabis are based on my assessment of the negative impacts prohibition has on users and society as a whole. With regards to kava, my experience with that was during a holiday in Fiji. As with cannabis, I have absolutely no desire to use the stuff now. Nonetheless, I also have no desire to prohibit people from doing something in the privacy of their own homes that has no impact on me whatsoever.

If we are going to start calling people idiots because they hold different opinions to us, I would suggest that the idiot label would be better applied to someone who uncritically accepts public policy that may in fact be quite flawed. Likewise, I would argue that the label would also apply to someone who is going to compare the private consumption of a relatively innocuous plant substance with murder.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back5:18 pm 08 Feb 12

Onceler said :

“Island of the Colorblind” by Oliver Sacks contains a very beautiful passage describing his kava experience on teh island of Pohnpei, Micronesia.

Didn’t that place get wiped out by a volcano?

Stevian said :

It is not racism. It is not intended to demonise anyone. It has nothing to do with cannabalism. It has nothing to do evil white men colonising countries.

It is a fact. And it was considered perfectly normal behaviour.

Whether it is still practised today I cannot say, but it most certainly was practised within the past 50 or so years.

I could dissect that entire comment in terms of implicit cultural imperialism or as you put it “evil white men colonising countries”. Leaving aside the question of whether it is true, or aberrent vs normative behaviour. You choose to interpret this practice refracted through the Western cultural lens. It is homoerotic behaviour and thus reprehensible?
Rape? Only from a western point of view
Within it’s own cultural context it may be considered perfectly normal if so, what of it? I’m sure some Western customs seems as bizarre and abhorrent when viewed from a different cultural perspective. Are you arrogant enough to believe the way we do things is the One True Right and Only Way?

I’m still trying to find the part where he judged anything? Can you point it out? Is it use of the word “rape” that has you in such a tizzy?

VYBerlinaV8_is_back5:08 pm 08 Feb 12

They asked for an exemption, it wasn’t granted. Is it really that big a deal?

“Island of the Colorblind” by Oliver Sacks contains a very beautiful passage describing his kava experience on teh island of Pohnpei, Micronesia. Seems it reduces anxiety without dulling the senses. I’d give it a go, given the right environment. Must get a hold of that book again.

buzz819 said :

Jethro said :

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

Kava is very very mild. I drank litres of the stuff over the course of a few hours and basically ended up with a mild level of drowsiness, akin to maybe two or three beers.

The classification of Kava is silly. There is a fair bit of evidence that Polynesian communities with limited access to Kava are turning to alcohol instead, with far worse social consequences.

Mate your an idiot, between this and your pro cannabis wanks you put up on here, the line is drawn in the sand, you can not drink it legally, you can not possess, grow or supply cannabis, you can not drink and drive, you can not murder people, you can not have too many persons in the one licensed premises. You don’t like the laws then buy an island and do what you want. Go back over to the Greens and focus on the big issues, like women only pools.

Spoilsport.

It is not racism. It is not intended to demonise anyone. It has nothing to do with cannabalism. It has nothing to do evil white men colonising countries.

It is a fact. And it was considered perfectly normal behaviour.

Whether it is still practised today I cannot say, but it most certainly was practised within the past 50 or so years.

I could dissect that entire comment in terms of implicit cultural imperialism or as you put it “evil white men colonising countries”. Leaving aside the question of whether it is true, or aberrent vs normative behaviour. You choose to interpret this practice refracted through the Western cultural lens. It is homoerotic behaviour and thus reprehensible?
Rape? Only from a western point of view
Within it’s own cultural context it may be considered perfectly normal if so, what of it? I’m sure some Western customs seems as bizarre and abhorrent when viewed from a different cultural perspective. Are you arrogant enough to believe the way we do things is the One True Right and Only Way?

Stevian said :

Baldy said :

Stevian said :

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

Agree it does. If true how the h*** did a tradition like that start????

Frankly I can’t remember the source, it’s been a long time since I studied anthropology at uni.

And no, nothing racist about it.

Just showing that because something is tradition it doesn’t mean that it is good.

Like stories of Canibalism such tales are primarily to demonise the “savage primitives” and as such are Racist. If in anyway true, they are account of abberant rather than normative behaviour. So the question stands is it just a travelers tale or is there any truth to it?

Why do people simply scream ‘racism’ whenever something they don’t like is mentioned?

It is not racism. It is not intended to demonise anyone. It has nothing to do with cannabalism. It has nothing to do evil white men colonising countries.

It is a fact. And it was considered perfectly normal behaviour.

Whether it is still practised today I cannot say, but it most certainly was practised within the past 50 or so years.

If it is a fact as you say, please provide evidince.
Otherwise I agree with the suggestion that there is a good chance that it is a myth that was developed to demonise a group of non-white, non-christian people and can therefore be claimed to be a racist statement.

Stevian said :

Like stories of Canibalism such tales are primarily to demonise the “savage primitives” and as such are Racist. If in anyway true, they are account of abberant rather than normative behaviour. So the question stands is it just a travelers tale or is there any truth to it?

What a ridiculous bit of leftist ideology you are regurgitating. I assumed it was satire on first reading.

What’s the clear evidence of cannibalism among Japanese troops in New Guinea? Racism as well?

Cannibalism in plenty of savage primitive cultures was entirely normative, contrary to your leftie delusions.

Suttee, also, was not aberrant (but definitely abhorrent).

Plenty of cultures display plenty of normative behaviours which are completely unacceptable to a civilised society.
Fact.
Not “Racism”.

It’s a combination of lack of thought and knee jerk reaction intelligence. The religion of the left states that any time any differences between races are noted, or that a person is of a race, or of another colour skin, gets mentioned, screaming “racism” is the most powerful approbation that can be issued, and saves you ever having to think about the subject or actual issue at hand.

racism or racialism
— n
1. the belief that races have distinctive cultural characteristics determined by hereditary factors and that this endows some races with an intrinsic superiority over others
2. abusive or aggressive behaviour towards members of another race on the basis of such a belief

Having done some reading today (no, I’m not claiming to be an expert), it seems the biggest issues with kava come down to overuse, or use in conjunction with other intoxicants. Used in lower levels of concentration, and treated as a social use, it appears to be no worse that alcohol in similar concentration and use patterns.

colourful sydney racing identity4:05 pm 08 Feb 12

HenryBG said :

Baldy said :

Stevian said :

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

Agree it does. If true how the h*** did a tradition like that start????

Sounds plausible – a parallel tradition seems to have developed within the Catholic Church.

Anyway, Kava is far more harmless than alcohol or tobacco. Its ban is a form of cultural discrimination against pacific islanders, just as Jethro said.
Completely hypocritical and unacceptable in this day and age.

Frankly I can’t remember the source, it’s been a long time since I studied anthropology at uni.

And no, nothing racist about it.

Just illustrating that just because something is traditional it doesn’t necessarily mean that it is good.

I was also informed about this practice while studying ANthropolgoy at ANU some years back.

Kerehona said :

chewy14 said :

In my culture it’s common to snort MDMA and dance all night.
Can we get an exemption?

Kava drinkers shouldn’t be considered as drug addicts

No. Particulaly since it isn’t illegal.

Baldy said :

Stevian said :

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

Agree it does. If true how the h*** did a tradition like that start????

Frankly I can’t remember the source, it’s been a long time since I studied anthropology at uni.

And no, nothing racist about it.

Just showing that because something is tradition it doesn’t mean that it is good.

Like stories of Canibalism such tales are primarily to demonise the “savage primitives” and as such are Racist. If in anyway true, they are account of abberant rather than normative behaviour. So the question stands is it just a travelers tale or is there any truth to it?

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

That might explain the recent increases in Catholic clergy resident in PNG.

Baldy said :

Stevian said :

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

Agree it does. If true how the h*** did a tradition like that start????

Sounds plausible – a parallel tradition seems to have developed within the Catholic Church.

Anyway, Kava is far more harmless than alcohol or tobacco. Its ban is a form of cultural discrimination against pacific islanders, just as Jethro said.
Completely hypocritical and unacceptable in this day and age.

chewy14 said :

In my culture it’s common to snort MDMA and dance all night.
Can we get an exemption?

Kava drinkers shouldn’t be considered as drug addicts

For those who didn’t know, Kava is to the Pacific Islanders the Blood of Christ.
So important that the Tongan Royalty drink it in ceremonial matters.
For Australian Islanders, Kava drinking groups or clubs are ways for the community to come together – keep, the young men off the street and learn the thousands of songs, oratory and also the art of comedy and public speaking. When the men get together they pool money for members of the community in need.
This money from every Kava club is sent back to support the homeland – plus sustains the Kava industry there.

Without blowing my own trumpet again, I filmed a kava club – http://vimeo.com/23034059
For those who think Kava should be banned you may learn something and change your opinion.

“Honest officer, smoking it is part of my culture and heritage, Rastafari, Jah rule!!!

Stevian said :

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

Agree it does. If true how the h*** did a tradition like that start????

Thoroughly Smashed said :

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In some PNG tribes it is tradition for the Big Men to initiate the young boys into the tribe by gathering them all together in a single building for a night and then raping them.

.

Got a cite for that? Sounds like Racist Bulls***

buzz819 said :

Jethro said :

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

Kava is very very mild. I drank litres of the stuff over the course of a few hours and basically ended up with a mild level of drowsiness, akin to maybe two or three beers.

The classification of Kava is silly. There is a fair bit of evidence that Polynesian communities with limited access to Kava are turning to alcohol instead, with far worse social consequences.

Mate your an idiot, between this and your pro cannabis wanks you put up on here, the line is drawn in the sand, you can not drink it legally, you can not possess, grow or supply cannabis, you can not drink and drive, you can not murder people, you can not have too many persons in the one licensed premises. You don’t like the laws then buy an island and do what you want. Go back over to the Greens and focus on the big issues, like women only pools.

yes because drinking a mild sedative that has yet to be proven to have any effect on anyone is akin to murdering someone. Meanwhile alcohol and smoking is legal. Just because something is illegal now doesn’t mean it has to be forever.

Also I don’t think drinking it is illegal, just selling teh drink at social gatherings.

Jethro said :

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

Kava is very very mild. I drank litres of the stuff over the course of a few hours and basically ended up with a mild level of drowsiness, akin to maybe two or three beers.

The classification of Kava is silly. There is a fair bit of evidence that Polynesian communities with limited access to Kava are turning to alcohol instead, with far worse social consequences.

Mate your an idiot, between this and your pro cannabis wanks you put up on here, the line is drawn in the sand, you can not drink it legally, you can not possess, grow or supply cannabis, you can not drink and drive, you can not murder people, you can not have too many persons in the one licensed premises. You don’t like the laws then buy an island and do what you want. Go back over to the Greens and focus on the big issues, like women only pools.

Duffbowl said :

Jethro said :

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

No hysteria on my part. Just wondering where the line gets drawn. Kava, like alcohol and tobacco, is regulated for public consumption in Australia.

While you can indeed drink litres of the stuff, it is dependent on the preparation. Just like making alchohol, changing the quantities used in preparation can change the final product.

The line has been drawn in the wrong place.

I see the Kava ban in a similar light to the cannabis ban, which was originally a racist reaction to its use by Mexicans and black people in America.

Jethro said :

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

No hysteria on my part. Just wondering where the line gets drawn. Kava, like alcohol and tobacco, is regulated for public consumption in Australia.

While you can indeed drink litres of the stuff, it is dependent on the preparation. Just like making alchohol, changing the quantities used in preparation can change the final product.

Quit the hysteria buzz819 and Duffbowl.

Kava is very very mild. I drank litres of the stuff over the course of a few hours and basically ended up with a mild level of drowsiness, akin to maybe two or three beers.

The classification of Kava is silly. There is a fair bit of evidence that Polynesian communities with limited access to Kava are turning to alcohol instead, with far worse social consequences.

Thoroughly Smashed11:01 am 08 Feb 12

Because tradition has always been a good reason to keep doing something.

In my culture it’s common to snort MDMA and dance all night.
Can we get an exemption?

alicerusselwallace10:44 am 08 Feb 12

This site might be of interest to folks: http://www.australiankavamovement.com.au/

Kava is an integral part of the culture of Polynesian, Micronesian and Melanesian culture – it’s an integral part of the culture of Oceania (including Australia), in fact.

I hear it’s traditional to chew on coca leaves in South America. Maybe we could ask for that?

Yes and allowing people to supply what is classed as a prescription only medicine to anyone thus giving them permission to break the law is a sooo much better alternative.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.