Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Expert strata, facilities & building management services

Planning Minister seeks bright ideas from afar

By Paul Costigan - 11 February 2016 5

Haig-ParkP1010970

On a recent visit to Wollongong I observed the notices for and then read about the consultations for a major project: Wollongong – A City for People. Being a frequent visitor to this wonderful coastal city, I have some understanding of the urban issues facing that city’s local council.

There is a very common unresolved issue that so many cities, including Wollongong, are grappling with – unsuccessfully. Namely – what to do when the central area is dominated by a big box mall that has sucked the life out of the formerly busy shopping streets?

Canberra’s Civic area has the same problem and like Wollongong (and so many others) it has yet to work out a solution of how to breathe life back into the commercial areas adjacent to the mall.

As in Wollongong and Canberra – we have seen a host of experts arrive to drop a swag of ideas and then depart leaving the government to produce documents with loads of pretty pictures. Over time that is what we end up with – loads of pretty pictures. But we still have nothing to address the issues around these largely abandoned open spaces.

Part of the problem here in Canberra is that we seem to be approaching such redevelopments in an ad hoc fashion. While there are the coming major projects along Northbourne, and several others around the city and in other areas of the city, this government (and I mean all parties involved) has not even come close to suggesting what should happen with Civic.

Instead the electorate is being bombarded with distractions and numerous other projects that somehow need to be addressed urgently and take priority over the future of Civic.

We now see that the ACT Planning Minister and a cohort of consultants and business people are about to head off overseas to see if they can pick up even more ideas.

I applaud the initiatives to look outside our own borders, but do wonder if anyone involved thinks that more ideas will assist this city at this crucial time of its maturity as an international city.

Mice-Men-P1120744

Canberra has had decades of planning bureaucrats and consultants putting forth their latest fashionable and imported ideas about urban development, urban villages, transport, housing etc.

There has been a long history of experts being flown in to put their case for their favoured approach to urban issues. There has also been a practice of importing expensive architectural consultants to deliver on such projects.

All the imported concepts sound wonderful and were very successful (most likely) in the places that initiated them. But Canberra is not Seattle, it is not Tucson, it is not Copenhagen and it is not (insert any other city that is currently in fashion).

After all those years of conferences attended by our planning bureaucrats, after all the parliamentary overseas study trips, after all the incoming experts and the mountains of glossy documents produced by the various agencies, what have we achieved – besides mountains of glossy brochures that feature the same set of images as used in so many reports for other cities?

One would have thought that with all those decades of new ideas and new approaches, that by now Canberra itself would have developed its own case studies that should by now be proud models that could be exported for others to think about.

With so much investment – where are the wonderful results!

Where is the unique Canberra urban style, the local architecture and landscape designs that the rest of the world should be flocking here to see?

P1110491

I am not against the Minister going overseas to look around and to talk to others about their success stories. Definitely not!

Do I think anything will come from the business people and consultants accompanying him? Yes – unfortunately we will now be bombarded with even more arguments for their pet development projects.

Here are a couple of alternative thoughts on what is needed – and what is wrong with the present overseas tour as planned.

demolish-01This city needs the government to invest in local consultants and to insist that local expertise becomes more independent of government (and the developers). They need to be encouraged to bring forth innovations – to get creative again – to base everything on good design and real sustainability ( not green wash) – rather than more of the same based on what the development and property lobby seek in order to maintain their levels of profit.

The city should by now have an abundance of innovation and design relevant to Canberra in architectural, environmental and landscape design. We don’t.

The government needs to invest in local expertise for the long term so that urban models are developed in a ‘Canberra style’ – not just another pastiche of the current fashionable out-of-the box imported bland box styles.

We need to build the capacity of our local expertise to deliver local projects. Let us dream of the day when local project ideas are being poached for use elsewhere.

Most importantly what is missing from the Minister’s announcement is any mention that he is going forth into the world to seek out models of best practice in community engagement.

It is time for local governments, including the ACT Government, to drop their resource wasting bad practices in how they deal with their own residents.

It is time that the ACT Minister for Planning and his government stopped thinking that they are doing things for the residents but instead learn to work with the residents to bring about all the complexities of change that come with a maturing city such as Canberra.

If we were talking about an overseas study tour to look at successful community engagement models and the resultant urban successes, then that would be worth the investment of taxpayers’ money!

Over to you Minister.

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
5 Responses to
Planning Minister seeks bright ideas from afar
1
jamesblake2908 12:10 pm
11 Feb 16
#

I would suggest that the ACT Government’s City to Lake Plan is their chosen solution to the issue of dead streets in Civic.

http://www.lda.act.gov.au/citytothelake/

From what I can ascertain, the purpose is to shift the ‘demographic centre’ of Civic away from the Canberra Centre, where most of the social and entertainment is located. At the moment, you have a massive gaping hole in the middle of our city that only contains carparking and some service buildings, creating a massive divide between the east and the west of the city.

Filling this gap, as well as linking the CBD to the lake better will provide the opportunity to centre more entertainment and social elements away from the Canberra Centre and create a more pedestrian friendly city centre. I’m definitely hoping this could be the solution to the dead streets of Civic

2
wildturkeycanoe 2:59 pm
11 Feb 16
#

What we really need is a heap of very expensive art sculptures that vaguely resemble some local botany or fauna. That will bring a rush of people to the city, so much so that we need more trams, more highrise buildings and more coffee shops to cater for the masses. That’s the CBR way, confident, bold and ridiculous.

3
rubaiyat 9:58 am
12 Feb 16
#

What we really need is some performance art. Some of the locals trying to get out of their cars and never quite managing it.

But I imagine the tourists really come here to see the worlds oldest unchanged town plan. Canberra being exactly the way it is, fully formed and perfect since before recorded history.

4
miz 7:54 am
14 Feb 16
#

rubaiyat said :

What we really need is some performance art. Some of the locals trying to get out of their cars and never quite managing it.

But I imagine the tourists really come here to see the worlds oldest unchanged town plan. Canberra being exactly the way it is, fully formed and perfect since before recorded history.

Ignoring the sarkiness of Rubaiyat’s post, in fact I think people do visit to see pre-self-govt Canberra, and most people who end up staying do so because of the benefits of pre-self-govt planning and suburbia. Unfortunately most post-self-govt changes have been either actively or neglectfully detrimental to what residents like about Canberra.

5
Nilrem 9:41 am
15 Feb 16
#

That big box mall is planning to expand across Bunda street. They already own the block. Can’t they be required to redevelop the block in a way that prevents the expansion of the mall, and retains street-level shopping, with the shops on the outside? All we need is another block of Civic turned into concrete walls.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au

Search across the site