Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Canberra's experts selling valuables
150,000+ buyers nationally

Rally for Same Sex Civil Unions – Sat 2nd Feb, 1pm

By simbo 30 January 2008 75

(from a press release)

Join us on February 2nd, 1pm, outside the ACT Legislative Assembly to rally for same sex civil unions. This is a peaceful protest to stand up for the original version of the Civil Unions Bill that allows for official ceremonies. We support the ACT Legislative Assembly’s efforts in discarding archaic prejudiced norms that are not representative of our community. We urge Federal Labor to reject party room pressure and take the ethical vantage point agreed upon by 60% of the Australian population.

In 2008 let’s get the gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex community the most basic of rights.

Let’s get our civil unions.

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
75 Responses to
Rally for Same Sex Civil Unions – Sat 2nd Feb, 1pm
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
simbo 9:24 pm 04 Feb 08

Maelinar, they still have parents, brothers and sisters. All of whom can, and do, contest away.

I understand you’re deeply ensconsed in nappies and parenting, but other famililial relationships matter just as much.

Mælinar 10:40 am 04 Feb 08

I would hazard to imply that people in truly homosexual relationships wouldn’t really have contestable wills would they ?

Wife and Children = contest. A true to form homo isn’t going to have that problem unless they have been in a period of denial, notwithstanding they will then have an obligation to look after their ‘mistakes’.

Like it or not, it’s the same with multiple-marriage and children no matter what your sexuality is.

Thumper 10:18 am 04 Feb 08

What about people who can now only remember what sex was like.


Ari 9:53 am 04 Feb 08

What about people who’s sexual organs are located on their foreheads?

Errr … headrosexual?

Crikey 9:01 am 04 Feb 08

They say only around 100 people attended. WOW, so much community interest. Considering there would be a few thousand plus gays in Canberra – they aren’t even interested.

Deadmandrinking 11:25 pm 02 Feb 08

I agree Simbo. Marriage exists in many different cultures in many different forms. As far as the law goes, it’s merely a kind of economic bond between two people and to let that be determined by the morality of the churches would not be doing well on the keeping churches and the state separate front.

Crikey 2:09 pm 01 Feb 08

Troy may have a conflict of interest?

Skidbladnir 12:46 pm 01 Feb 08

I still think someone should draw out Troy on the topic.
(I am not particularly passionate about the cause, so call dibs on not making any phone calls and staying at home if the weather doesn’t suit me)

Crikey 12:23 pm 01 Feb 08

Barr will be there rooting for them!

simbo 8:40 pm 31 Jan 08

Yep, fair enough. Which is why divorce should always be available as well. But … well, it’s very easy to throw things away, and anything that makes you give it a second look is worth it in my book…

Sands 8:10 pm 31 Jan 08

But what happens if you made a mistake simbo and you end up being utterly, utterly miserable. Do you feel compelled to stay in a loveless marriage?

Don’t get me wrong, I get all warm and fuzzy by the concept, but just challenge it as I get older. It might make you try a bit harder and I’m all for that but it shouldn’t mean that you HAVE to stay with that one person forever – especially if you don’t love them and you could be happy with someone else.

simbo 8:03 pm 31 Jan 08

It also relates to being able to make hospital visits (the actively hostile parents of a patient can make sure that their child’s same-sex partner can’t visit them, no matter how long the relationship), as well as a number of other rights (one story I was told had a man being denied the right to find out what was happening to his partner’s dog by his vet).

To me, marriage is an english language word that means what happens when two people who love each other come together in front of friends, family and a celebrant or friendly priests (yes, there are many religious people who DO support same-sex unions – some of them in positions of power). So I’d be happy with the word marriage.

Strange as it may seem (and possibly because I am still single) I think it’s not a bad thing for people to decide to share the rest of their lives together, forsaking all others, in good times and bad. And I don’t really give a flying hoot whether they happen to be same sex or opposite sex.

People were getting married well before Christianity came along. Pagans, Buddists, the ancient Romans, Greeks… whatever. Just because some weddings take place in churches doesn’t mean they control it. Just because some people drink wine in a church doesn’t mean that churches have control over the distribution of red wine, either…

Danman 5:55 pm 31 Jan 08

That should be Homosexual and defacto partners folks 🙂

Sorry 🙂

Danman 5:54 pm 31 Jan 08

Will and superannuation and all that crap aside, Partners still do not have enduring power of attorney by default. What this means is that if they are unaware and have not applied for enduring power of attorney they can not make decisions in regards to when to turn of life support, what drugs to administer and any medical decisions where they subject is in no physical or mental state to make those decisions themselves..

howdy 5:28 pm 31 Jan 08

Also, the under superannuation legislation the definition of ‘dependent’ may include same sex couples however once the money goes to the estate another set of rules applies – hence why you are best seeing a lawyer re your estate, not your superfund advisors…

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | | |

Search across the site