Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Avani Terraces - Greenway
Life is looking up

Stanhope’s defiant stand grows

By Kerces - 18 October 2005 23

Jon Stanhope’s latest on the terror laws is that he’s ordered the ACT Parliamentary Counsel to draft our own version of the Federal Government’s counter-terrorism laws.

He wants to ensure whatever laws are eventually passed in the ACT comply with his baby the Human Rights Act, passed last year. This could mean the ACT ends up with different counter-terrorism laws to the rest of the country.

John Howard’s also changed somewhat on his stance on the importance of the draft. Originally he said what Mr Stanhope had put on his website was only a draft and that changes had been made since then. Now he’s saying the changes that have been made are only “cosmetic” — implying the draft legislation is reasonably close to what the actual legislation will be.

The Sydney Morning Herald is commenting on the state of agitation Mr Stanhope’s move has put the Federal Government in. They were counting on having very tight control over the passage of this legislation and basically he’s blown this to bits. Now they might actually have to let their backbench and the Senate have a good look at the legislation before pushing it through.

Readers of both the CT and the SMH have got plenty to say on the matter (as do, I’m sure, many other people but those are the two I picked).

The Canberra Liberal Party had a fun day yesterday pulling out their books of insults again and calling Mr Stanhope a spoilt child and ego-driven. Brendan Smyth has come up with a whole list of what he calls “hotheaded lapses in judgement” by Mr Stanhope (you can read my views on the childishness of all politicians here).

The Chief Minister faces a censure motion in the Assembly today over the whole affair, but no doubt the Labor majority will overturn that.

And finally, Geoff Pryor thinks Mr Stanhope’s stolen the wheel from under the PM’s nose.

UPDATE A couple of Murdoch press reactions below.

Piers Akerman says Stanhope’s being irresponsible and immature.

SHOWING once again he is not the best man to have on your side in a firestorm, ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope, on whose watch Canberra burnt two summers ago, has abandoned all ethical and security considerations in an attempt to undermine the Federal Government’s proposed anti-terrorism legislation.

The Australian’s editorial is running with the line that this shouldn’t be turned into a civil liberties debate because there is a real threat and so the laws are necessary.

UPDATED: [ED – Murdoch henchman catspaw and fat sack of crap, Piers Akerman, does a lovely roundup of the Chief Minister’s greatest hits before running off the rails and hysterically announcing that, locked as we are in global conflict with “terror”, all measures are necessary. — WHOOPS Umm, yes Kerces had that one under control.]

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
23 Responses to
Stanhope’s defiant stand grows
Mr Evil 8:32 am 19 Oct 05

Re-education by “Rule 303”?

Thumper 7:46 am 19 Oct 05

Ah…

Isn’t that re-education, such as in Cambodia, NV, North Korea.

terubo 8:57 pm 18 Oct 05

No, just ‘education of the masses’.

Mr Evil 5:02 pm 18 Oct 05

I think that’d be called a purge – Revolutionaries love those!

kimba 4:42 pm 18 Oct 05

There are already plenty of “bogans” and “dickwits” already living in the ACT. So there would be a chance of sedition from within!

terubo 3:46 pm 18 Oct 05

Come to think of it, it is a little like Cuba and the exclsuion zone, isn’t it? The little pimple that for so long has irritated Uncle Sam…
Viva Cuba! Viva RepublicACT! Viva Che! Viva Fidel! Viva Stancastro…er, Stancastrope!!
(I always drop my ‘aitches’).

Thumper 2:59 pm 18 Oct 05

hehe

Fair comment!

terubo 2:44 pm 18 Oct 05

All the more reason for our exclusion, Thumper. Besides, I like the idea of an ‘exclusion zone’ around the ACT…keeps dickwits, Waratahs and various bogans OUT.
Viva la RepublicACT!

Thumper 2:13 pm 18 Oct 05

Although this comment in Ackermans essay echoes what I said previously;

“it would be perfectly understandable should colleagues in the state and federal governments exclude him from future confidential talks and briefings”

And that is a worry given that we are a small, insignificant little blip on the Australian political, social, geographical and economic radar.

Thumper 1:47 pm 18 Oct 05

Piers is a little too right wing for me….

but I’ll give it a read later…..

kimba 1:17 pm 18 Oct 05

I was very amused by Piers Akerman’s article on our Nero in today’s Telegraph.

Indi 12:15 pm 18 Oct 05

The CM was obviously never a boy scout – ‘be prepared son, that’s my motto’

Mr Evil 11:55 am 18 Oct 05

Can we para-drop Stanhope into Bagdhad so he can join his fellow revolutionaries?

Thumper 11:29 am 18 Oct 05

The Comrade is becoming quite the little revolutionary isn’t he.

How quaint….

terubo 10:29 am 18 Oct 05

Nice work, Kerces. Wonder what the Murdoch press is saying.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site