Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Building inclusive
connected communities

Support Freedom in Iran

BenL 17 June 2009 26

Since Friday’s election millions of Iranians have risked their lives to fight for democracy and freedom. Let’s show them that they are not alone. Come and show your support for human rights and freedom of expression in Iran.

Gather on the lawns of Parliament house this Thursday June 18 at 5pm for a candlelight vigil in support of the people of Iran.

PLEASE WEAR GREEN TO THE VIGIL.

RSVP on facebook and invite your friends.
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=45759939980

How else can you help?
– Wear green in support of Iran.
– Join this group http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=97222527126

Contact Ben on 0404 206 781 for more information.

Tags

What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
26 Responses to Support Freedom in Iran
Filter
Order
Jim Jones Jim Jones 11:12 am 19 Jun 09

jakez said :

Firstly, I don’t think Ahemenidejad is legitimate simply because he won some election. There are millions of Iranians who did not vote for him, do not support him, and I believe they have a right to self determination.

As much as I’m no great fan of Ahmenidejad, that statement could be made about *all* democratically elected political leaders.

jakez jakez 10:38 am 19 Jun 09

I’m not convinced Ahmenidejad lost either however I think that point is rather moot.

Firstly, I don’t think Ahemenidejad is legitimate simply because he won some election. There are millions of Iranians who did not vote for him, do not support him, and I believe they have a right to self determination.

Secondly, putting aside my anarchist ways. Considering the constitutional arrangements of Iran, any election is far from a legitimate expression of democratic will.

Thirdly, the election is just a catalyst for a broader movement that combines a wide range of ‘reformist’ beliefs ranging from simply liking Mousavi’s brand of tyranny better to radical calls for an end to the Ayatollah’s regime and a complete opening of Iran as a secular and pro-western nation-state (which is what Iran should be, except that whole Shah thing made people cranky).

p1 p1 12:55 pm 18 Jun 09

So far this page alone has eleven links of outside websites on the subject. So this page is actually not a bad place to learn more*, even if it is supposedly a Canberra specific blag.

* – I make no judgements or assumptions about the accuracy or balance of that information.

peterh peterh 12:23 pm 18 Jun 09

Skidbladnir said :

You use an explicitly “online forum for News and Views in the Canberra (ACT) Region” to find information and form an opinion on domestic political issues in Iran?
Seriously?

considering the opinions that are presented here, and the wealth of information that seems to come with the commenters and the links that they provide, yes, skid, I do. I also find out about the broader canberra perception of events overseas through our own involvement, be it a rally, protest or other event that canberrans attend. I don’t read the crimes, I don’t watch the news. I have no idea what is going on in the rest of the world. I rely on the riotact to provide me with information as it comes to hand, that I feel is relevant to me, from a canberra perspective.

Skidbladnir Skidbladnir 11:25 am 18 Jun 09

You use an explicitly “online forum for News and Views in the Canberra (ACT) Region” to find information and form an opinion on domestic political issues in Iran?
Seriously?

peterh peterh 11:07 am 18 Jun 09

johnboy said :

I’m talking about a consistent pattern, not just this one comment Luther. Any further discussion is best sent via email as it’s offtopic.

All,
I used this site to try and understand the situation, as I was unaware of the events unfolding in Iran. In reflection, if I was able to attend the vigil, I would. To have a crackdown in a country that was being touted as the new islamic republic of the magnitude that we are seeing here will lead to revolution instead of evolution for the regime. The removal of access to the internet, fighting in the university campuses, expulsion of foreigners for the beginning of the cleansing of the country, these are all steps taken by other nations which have led to civil unrest, fighting and the deaths of innocents. The Iranian people are not averse to the Islamic republic, they just don’t believe that their vote was counted, or recorded as per their wishes as individuals in the voting system. This is something that I would protest against. If the election was allowed to run its course as an independent event, with no input from the government or the militia, the results may have been different. I have spoken at length to a friend who is iranian, his insight and the links / information posted on the RiotACT allowed me to be able to form an opinion.

Brandi Brandi 9:32 am 18 Jun 09

(Not to mention corrupt Indonesian elections…)

Brandi Brandi 9:31 am 18 Jun 09

Robert Fisk seems to find plenty of opportunity to report freely within Iran, and he says that the police and the military in Tehran are handling protests and counter-protests with surprising moderation (at least, anecdotally):

http://search.abc.net.au/search/click.cgi?url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/17/2600571.htm&rank=3

So far events don’t seem significantly worse than the mass protests in Jakarta a few years ago. Yet despite the vile transgressions of Indonesian military elements we haven’t made a pariah state of them – that would be inconvenient.

Beserk Keyboard Warrior Beserk Keyboard Warrior 8:20 am 18 Jun 09

These type of rallies are pointless and only serve to make the people involved feel good about themselves without having to actually go to any real effort. Like the Australian Government will wave their magic wand and go “there you go, fixed”.

In my opinion giving your local Salvo ten bucks would do more good for the world than 5000 Arts students linking hands raising “awareness”.

I’m sure it impresses other left leaning public servants at dinner parties when you can ramble on about worldly issues that you actually know very little about, like Iranian politics for example.

My point is, if you really want to do something positive, choose something where you can actually make a difference rather than wasting money printing t-shirts that’ll make good dipstick rags.

nathan nathan 6:07 am 18 Jun 09

…Peter was simply saying that due to his limited understanding of Iranian politics that he couldn’t demonstrate in this cause, and probably not for the opposing side either. This is his opinion…

Fence sitting is, by definition, the absence of an opinion. By his own admission, he doesn’t know enough about the topic to be able to form one.

nathan nathan 5:54 am 18 Jun 09

Re the Washington Post poll: here are the details from the company who conducted the poll. Note that in response to the question, “If the Presidential elections were held today, who would you vote for?”, of 1001 respondents, (76 + 151 + 274) = 501 = 50% would not commit to a candidate.

Not sure about you, but if I lived under a more totalitarian regime than ours, and someone called me out of the blue asking my political preference, I may be reluctant to indicate my support for the opposition. Indeed, I may even run with “I’ll TOTALLY vote for the incumbent!”.

I’m sure the company’s credentials are impeccable; I’m not certain that the Iranian pollees would be convinced.

gannet gannet 8:42 pm 17 Jun 09

Another way to support is here: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/iran_vote_truth/?cl=255174668&v=3505

As for the suggestion that it was ‘legitimate’ : http://www.juancole.com/2009/06/stealing-iranian-election.html

johnboy johnboy 7:15 pm 17 Jun 09

I’m talking about a consistent pattern, not just this one comment Luther. Any further discussion is best sent via email as it’s offtopic.

luther_bendross luther_bendross 6:56 pm 17 Jun 09

Hang on John, I feel it necessary here to defend Peterh’s comment. I think (and please, anyone feel free to dispute this here) that Peter was simply saying that due to his limited understanding of Iranian politics that he couldn’t demonstrate in this cause, and probably not for the opposing side either. This is his opinion, and if this site is not based predominantly on opinion then I’ll eat my Akubra. I think here that his ‘opinion’ is your ‘posting for the sake of it’.

For a thread that should be based on the discussion of free speech (an enigma within a riddle within a religious country), your response to him didn’t seem to promote this.

And with that, I shall get off my soap box.

BerraBoy68 BerraBoy68 6:26 pm 17 Jun 09

A few weeks ago, my wife invited one of her work colleagues and her husband over for dinner. They have been in Australia for only about 6 months having arrived her from Iran. I wasn’t sure what to expect, but it certainly wasn’t to quite taken with two very nice western oriented people that love democracy, sport, drink alcohol (and did so in their own country), hate oppression, hate religious intolerance (!) etc. What’s more they said they could not longer live under such an oppressive regime and that everybody they know in Iran feels the same way.

I’ll be there, JB. Not because it might change things in Iran in a hurry, but because I know for a fact that the Iranian nationals here will let their friends and family in Iran know that they are not all tarred with the same brush and that they do have support, as limited in effect as it might be.

Moral support or a butterfly flapping its wings? Most likely the former but I hope for the latter…

johnboy johnboy 6:25 pm 17 Jun 09

Unless the NY Times’ Roger Cohen is outright lying he’s documented a first hand account of voter fraud:

    He was from the Interior Ministry. He showed his ID card. He said he’d worked there 30 years. He said he hadn’t been allowed in; nor had most other employees. He said the votes never got counted. He said numbers just got affixed to each candidate.

.

And Peterh, for the very last time, if you have no knowledge of an issue (by your own admission) please refrain from commenting for the sake of it.

Thumper Thumper 6:16 pm 17 Jun 09

The word democracy means something different in Iran than it does here.

That’s how it is.

Woody is correct.

peterh peterh 6:09 pm 17 Jun 09

when freedom of expression is challenged here, I will protest. I don’t know enough about the iranian voting system to give an educated view.

Woody Mann-Caruso Woody Mann-Caruso 5:19 pm 17 Jun 09

(Seriously, though, this is a better analysis.)

Woody Mann-Caruso Woody Mann-Caruso 5:04 pm 17 Jun 09

Not keen. There is every likelihood that Ahmadinejad legitimately won the presidency.

Ya reckon?

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site