Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Quality childcare in a
welcoming & supportive environment

Teaching Australian History in Schools

By Glimmertwins 11 October 2007 90 is reporting that students should not be forced to learn Prime Minister John Howard’s version of Australian history according to the the NSW and ACT governments.

Mr Howard will launch the federal government’s guide to Australian history at Moorebank High School in Sydney’s west today, which will make it mandatory for all year 9 and 10 students to study the subject.

Federal Education Minister Julie Bishop said the compulsory teaching of Australian history would be a condition of the federal-state schools 2009-2012 funding agreement.

“The states have already said, and they said it at the time of the Australian history summit, that they agreed with the Commonwealth Government’s position, they agreed with the Howard Government that the teaching of Australian history should be compulsory in Years nine and 10, and taught in a sequential way throughout primary school and secondary school,” she said.

But NSW and the ACT governments have accused the Federal Government of bullying and political interference.

ACT Education Minister Andrew Barr said the Federal Government’s move was similar to its threat to impose the HSC on the ACT.

He said history was already taught in ACT schools.

“It is this same old bullying approach, where if you don’t do exactly what we want, well, we will cut your funding,” he said on ABC radio.

“What we are effectively being asked to adopt here is … John Howard’s version of Australian history.

“To suggest that, as the Prime Minister has, that if the states and territories do not adopt the Prime Minister’s guide to the teaching of Australian history that funding will be cut … that’s a significant level of political interference into what’s being taught in our schools.”

NSW Education Minister John Della Bosca said Australian history had already been compulsory for all year nine and 10 students in the state since 1999.

“John Howard is at least eight years behind the times,” Mr Della Bosca said today.

“John Howard has lost any ability to work co-operatively.

“He makes these tired threats to cut funding, but he’s essentially copying the rigorous NSW curriculum and trying to impose it across the country.”

[Ed. I noticed that CT had a bit of coverage on this issue today as well. Its been a while since i did history but i seem to vaguely recall learning something about australian history during it.]

What’s Your opinion?

Please login to post your comments, or connect with
90 Responses to
Teaching Australian History in Schools
Showing only Website comments
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Senator Gaz 12:34 pm 16 Oct 07

Deadmandrinking 5:09 pm 12 Oct 07

Lets just invade NZ. We’re running short of patriots, apparently.

astrojax 4:53 pm 12 Oct 07

the main game is surely afl – the cats won the flag this year and THAT constitutes australianism better’n everything else, innit??

and australia does need a new flag – i rekkun a big pink one with noice yellow spots at each corner. never mistake us again…

Deadmandrinking 3:35 pm 12 Oct 07

Oh okay. Thanks thumper. That’s how you got your degree.
Now…was that a social issue?

And yes boomacat, I agree, very much so.

Ralph 3:31 pm 12 Oct 07

Read through again, never anywhere did I say “If you don’t love it, leave”.

You’re getting all confused with what Deadman is saying.

boomacat 3:24 pm 12 Oct 07

Nice, “if you don’t love it leave” comment Ralph, also know as “if you don’t agree with Ralph, you don’t love your country”.

A true patriot has the courage to dissent no matter how unpopular that may be. And if you think supporting the war in Iraq is in Australia’s interests, think again. The vast majority of Australians oppose Australia’s participation in that war.

I don’t like the flag. I think it is outdated. I do not want to represent my nation using the British colony standard (which looks just like all those other empire flags, NZ etc).

I would rather a flag that represents Australia now and what we hope for in the future.

Thumper 3:23 pm 12 Oct 07

“And I kind of think Gough might have brought them home”


He abolished national service. Australian troops were withdrawn before he held office as the PM

Deadmandrinking 3:20 pm 12 Oct 07

I’ll be at the CIT teachers homes pretty damn soon, don’t you worry, mate.

Ralph 3:16 pm 12 Oct 07

Loony alert.

Deadmandrinking 3:08 pm 12 Oct 07

What? Were Maolin and Stalin kicking out the rascist pricks? When?
And I kind of think Gough might have brought them home. It was an election promise, wasn’t it?


Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | | |

Search across the site