22 July 2024

Territory tremors as Labor wavers on Senate increase

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
6
Parliament

The States send 12 senators each to Canberra on six-year terms. The ACT has only two on three-year terms for a voter roll of 315,000. Photo: DPS AUSPIC.

Reports that Federal Labor is backing away from increasing the number of senators territories can elect have angered the Canberra Liberals and ACT Greens, while Chief Minister Andrew Barr is giving his federal colleagues the benefit of the doubt.

It appears increased Senate representation may have been shelved in haggling with the Coalition over electoral reform, including political donations.

The Coalition opposes increasing the number of senators, feeling the move would devalue state representation.

But Labor could force the issue in Parliament with the support of the Greens and ACT Independent Senator David Pocock, who always supported more representation for the ACT.

Questions to Special Minister of State Don Farrell, who is handling the negotiations, have gone unanswered.

READ ALSO Report says works on historic ANU childcare centres would harm heritage value

States send 12 senators to Canberra, all on six-year terms. There has been no change to the two territory senators on three-year terms since they were first introduced in 1975.

The ACT’s senators represent 315,032 enrolled voters, the NT’s less than half that, while Tasmania has 402,871 voters.

A doubling of senators for the ACT would give the Canberra Liberals, which do not have any representation in the Parliament at all since losing its Senate seat to Senator Pocock, a greater opportunity to again represent its sizable vote.

President Nick Tyrrell called on Labor to use the numbers available to pass legislation.

“The Canberra Liberals will always stand up for the best interests of the ACT, and this includes fighting for better representation for the huge proportion of the electorate who feel unrepresented by the Labor Party which treats the Territory like a safe seat, and an independent senator whose voting pattern most closely matches Lidia Thorpe,” he said

“Labor can pass its legislation to increase the number of senators for the Territories, as enough of the crossbench supports it, so why are they wimping out?”

Another possible beneficiary, the ACT Greens, said Labor’s apparent backflip was incredibly disappointing, saying the ACT was the most underrepresented jurisdiction in Australia

“Canberrans deserve to have a Senate which represents our community’s diverse voices,” a party spokesperson said. “The Greens will continue to campaign for democratic reforms that will see a more democratic and representative Federal Parliament.”

Chief Minister Andrew Barr said there was still time for the Parliament to act, given the federal election is up to 10 months away.

“Based on our growing populations, the ACT Government is hopeful that in the Parliament’s next term a modest increase in Senate representation for the Territories will be endorsed,” he said.

READ ALSO Civil remedies for sexual violence victim-survivors part of new restorative justice research

Senator Pocock said people in the ACT had made it clear that they want the territory to have fairer representation in the Senate.

“The Territories have had the same number of senators for more than 50 years and the time for change is now,” he said.

“Our community has a huge amount to contribute to the big national debates and policy development and fairer representation in the Senate would strengthen our democracy.”

Senator Farrell has previously confirmed publicly that he was planning to introduce legislation to increase the number of senators by the end of this year but Labor may be seeking a deal on political donations.

Join the conversation

6
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

What a joke and how offensive it is that the Canberra Liberals are now complaining that the ACT’s senate representation is illegitimate after losing their only senate seat. A party that is now claiming they will always stand up for the best interests of ACT residents and demanding that the government get on with the job of increasing representation.

Where were the Liberals efforts in increasing Territory representation when they were last in government? Where were the party’s local MLA’s standing up for territory rights and lobbying the party and its senator Zed Seselja? A deeply disliked senator who prior to entering the senate, spent over a decade on a quest to become ACT chief minister but used his significant powers when becoming senator to undermine and trash territory rights.

The Liberals had ten years in government to pass legislation to increase the number of senators in the Territories, but their unpopular senator refused to listen or act in the best interests of his constituents and those he opposed, bringing a contemptuous antagonism to ACT voters. A so-called Liberal safe seat which the party took for granted. A party that persistently preselected a candidate whose deeply held conservative values did not align with our city, but those of the religious and far-right.

The party has no relevance!

HiddenDragon9:00 pm 22 Jul 24

The NT has more than a whiff of failed state to it and both territories are fiscally unsustainable under their current governance arrangements.

The federal parliament should be facing up to those inconvenient truths rather than playing political games over how many elected officials the territories have to engage in ineffectual bloviation on their behalves on Capital Hill.

We are the most unrepresented city in the country. The government’s decision not to increase representation is reprehensible and the timidity and cowardice of the Albanese government is breathtaking. Canberra and our city’s residents are used to being looked down on and snickered at but where are our local Labor representatives representing our interests now that they are in government? Elected to represent our city but wimping out when making important decisions and caving in to the opposition.

Thank goodness for David Pocock!

Everyone quoted in this article is acting out of self-interest. They just want to make it easier to get themselves elected to the Senate. There is no good case for increasing the number of ACT senators. Contrary to what the Green’s spokesperson said, the ACT is actually over represented in the senate. Based on figures from the Australian Electoral Commission to March 2024, I calculate the ACT has one senator for every 159,270 enrolled electors. The average for Australia is one senator for every 234,313 enrolled electors. NSW has one senator for every 468,245 enrolled electors.

Exactly,
We are not remotely unrepresented. The fact that Tasmania is grossly overrepresented is not an argument that the Territories need more Senators.

ACT is not sensibly over-represented in that it ranks fifth of eight States and Territories on representation by eligible population. That is hardly under-representation either.

Doubling senators to 4 would move ACT to third in representation, not a general reform when representation is still so skewed away from the three populous States who would have four or more times the electors for each senator.

If you are going to use averages and compare States then it is first necessary to agree that the ‘States House’ principal for the Senate should be modified heavily in favour of proportional representation on State boundaries with an approximately common number of electors by State[Territory]. If one were to do that then assuming the current Senatorial total of 76, ACT representation would be 1.3 senators which is to say, one.

Some people should be happy with what they have; or work out what is actual electoral reform.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.