Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Lifestyle

Part of the Canberra community
for over 30 years

Wake up Zed?

By johnboy - 6 September 2013 19

On the one hand encouraging shameless media tart (and KAP candidate for an ACT Senate seat) Stephen Bailey seems like an ill-advised move.

On the other hand it is rather catchy.

Here’s what he had to say about his latest YouTube offering.

Even Tony Abbott is frustrated by the Canberra Liberals – Wake up Zed

Since April I have been encouraging Zed Seselja to represent the people of the ACT beyond that of his record of the past five years. I have put forth numerous statements, and have hoped with sincerity that Seselja would truly stand up for the people of the ACT. I and the vast majority of Canberrans have been underwhelmed and disenchanted. The last day of the election represents Seselja’s final chance to wake from his five-year slumber.

This video illustrates five years of unproductive slumber that doesn’t only frustrate me and his opponents, but also frustrates many Liberals – including Tony Abbott.

It’s well known that Tony Abbott preferred and endorsed Gary Humphries – who wasn’t as lazy as Zed. It’s also well-known that Seselja’s colleagues found him lazy and unproductive to work with.

I trust that you and your children will enjoy this video about the Canberra Liberals, Tony Abbott and Zed Seselja.

Sincerely,

Steven Bailey

We remain eagerly in anticipation of Zed’s Candidate Questionnaire.

Just in case you didn’t haul in the point Steven’s also done a Zed impersonation:

screenshot

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
19 Responses to
Wake up Zed?
mikten 7:50 pm 08 Sep 13

It is often said that politics is the refuge of those who cannot achieve in other fields. They don’t achieve there either other than to occupy a seat that could have been occupied by someone who could have made a meaninful contribution.
I know that Gary Humphries was not the ACT Senator in 1996, he was ACT Attorney General, but I do remember accusing fingers being pointed at him for not speaking out against and even supporting Howard’s mass sackings that put Canberra into deep- recession. http://workers.labor.net.au/233/print_index.html
” The excitement machine raised eyebrows in the nation’s capital when he threw his insubstantial weight behind Peter Costello’s claim that the best thing that ever happened to Canberra was the Liberal Government sacking 17,000 of its citizens.
No doubt they are far better off now that they no longer have to bother about paying a mortgage, collecting a pay packet or contributing to their country.”

LSWCHP 6:19 pm 08 Sep 13

CraigT said :

caf said :

One thing we can certainly say is that Zed has repeated his dubious result from the 2008 ACT elections of taking the Liberals backwards at an election in which Labor also went backwards.

I’m wondering if anybody here can explain the inner workings of the libs in terms of –
– Who chose Zed
– How Zed was chosen
– Why Zed was chosen

Some things are beyond the ken of mere mortals who don’t belong to political parties, and that last question is one of them. Why indeed?

The only thing that I can recall about Zed’s entire political career in the ACT is that he has had problems with running his office. Questions about timesheets, and use of government money for party purposes.

Apart from that, what has the guy done? Seriously, is there anybody out there who can enlighten me as to what Mr Seselja has achieved during his time in politics?

johnboy 5:51 pm 08 Sep 13

Margaret Reid Was The Act Senator In 1996

mikten 3:43 pm 08 Sep 13

And of course Zed, if elected to the Senate, will just roll over and let Tony Abbott tickle his tummy while thousands of Canberran public servants fall foul of sackings by “natural attrition”, just like Gary Humphries did in ’96. Not a word of protest will be heard.
Natural attrition is when you voluntarily leave your job with a department by resigning, retiring or death. Natural Attrition under the Libs will be your department leaving you. What could be more natural.

CraigT 1:51 pm 08 Sep 13

caf said :

One thing we can certainly say is that Zed has repeated his dubious result from the 2008 ACT elections of taking the Liberals backwards at an election in which Labor also went backwards.

I’m wondering if anybody here can explain the inner workings of the libs in terms of –
– Who chose Zed
– How Zed was chosen
– Why Zed was chosen

Deref 10:59 am 08 Sep 13

A shaft of gold when all about is darkness.

caf 10:15 am 08 Sep 13

IrishPete said :

Holden Caulfield said :

Sadly it looks like he’s going to have the last laugh.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2013/results/senate/act/

Loved the video.

The joke may be spreading, because the online CT article today http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/seselja-in-tight-contest-with-sheikh-for-second-seat-20130907-2td1e.html says “Mr Seselja was not available for comment”. What IS he doing? Is it the Liberal “small-target” approach?

But you might be jumping the gun with the ABC analysis. It shows Seselja elected largely based on the final allocation of Animal Justice party preferences. So that means the ABC is assuming that AJP voters have voted above the line. It won’t take many to have voted below the line, preferencing Greens over Liberals, for the ABC count to be wrong. Same goes for some of the earlier preference allocations, but they’re less easy to guess about.

IP

Ultimately the only preferences Zed is receiving in the indicative count are Animal Justice Party, Rise Up Australia and one third of the Stable Population Party. The rest are going to Simon.

While you’re right that there is bound to be quite a bit of leakage benefitting Simon from below-the-line AJP voters, there’s also likely to be some leakage the other way from below-the-line PUP and KAP voters benefitting Zed. We won’t know the result until the data-entry of below-the-line ballots is done. It will be close, but I suspect Zed has squeaked in, and it will be principally due to preferences from the AJP group voting ticket.

One thing we can certainly say is that Zed has repeated his dubious result from the 2008 ACT elections of taking the Liberals backwards at an election in which Labor also went backwards.

IrishPete 6:31 am 08 Sep 13

Holden Caulfield said :

Sadly it looks like he’s going to have the last laugh.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2013/results/senate/act/

Loved the video.

The joke may be spreading, because the online CT article today http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/seselja-in-tight-contest-with-sheikh-for-second-seat-20130907-2td1e.html says “Mr Seselja was not available for comment”. What IS he doing? Is it the Liberal “small-target” approach?

But you might be jumping the gun with the ABC analysis. It shows Seselja elected largely based on the final allocation of Animal Justice party preferences. So that means the ABC is assuming that AJP voters have voted above the line. It won’t take many to have voted below the line, preferencing Greens over Liberals, for the ABC count to be wrong. Same goes for some of the earlier preference allocations, but they’re less easy to guess about.

IP

Holden Caulfield 11:10 pm 07 Sep 13

Sadly it looks like he’s going to have the last laugh.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2013/results/senate/act/

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 4:07 pm 07 Sep 13

Lol

poetix 12:30 pm 06 Sep 13

Thank God this will all be over soon.

housebound 11:21 am 06 Sep 13

Catchy. Very catchy. Funny too.

Beau Locks 10:30 am 06 Sep 13

Gold.

Gungahlin Al 9:55 am 06 Sep 13

Well done. Cracked me up.
And that freeze frame looks like Vicki is chewing on Jeremy’s arm…

Holden Caulfield 9:09 am 06 Sep 13

Won’t somebody think of his children!

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site