Yarralumla kick ensured NCA kept Curtin community in the dark

Ian Bushnell 16 May 2020 23
Curtin horse paddock

Two years left: this Curtin scene will be a thing of the past when work starts on the new diplomatic estate. Photo: File.

The National Capital Authority must have learned a valuable lesson from its abortive attempt to carve out a new diplomatic estate in Yarralumla eight years ago – don’t frighten the horses, or more recently their owners.

In 2012, the burghers of Yarralumla weren’t about to quietly let the NCA put embassies on Stirling Park, even if it was Commonwealth land.

They kicked up such a stink that a federal parliamentary inquiry ensued and the NCA backed off.

Fast forward to 2020, and a blindsided ACT Equestrian Association and the Curtin community are fuming at the horse paddock fait accompli engineered by the NCA and a seemingly reluctant but in the end compliant ACT Government.

The NCA had been working with the ACT Government for at least three years on getting the land supply it needed for new embassies, and the 30 hectare North Curtin Horse paddock was always in the frame.

But while there had been speculation about Curtin, neither party was going to let the public in on what the NCA had long decided on.

Despite the Commonwealth having the whip hand in negotiations, the NCA did not want another community backlash over the loss of a great swathe of green space complicating matters.

NCA CEO Sally Barnes

NCA CEO Barnes: consultation would have been pointless.

NCA CEO Sally Barnes says it would have been disingenuous to consult with the community because it was not for turning on the matter.

That’s easy to say after the deal was done but surely the community had a right to know what was coming.

What occurred, in the end, was a power play, first with the ACT Government over West Basin and then the unsuspecting paddock users and the Curtin community.

If the NCA had been totally indifferent to the community’s views it would have announced its intentions and executed the land grab, without worrying about the ACT Government’s or anyone else’s concerns, as it legitimately can under The Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988.

But that would probably not have been a good look.

The NCA can point to the outcome of that 2013 parliamentary inquiry to justify its land grab. It recommended that the NCA develop a long-term strategy for the allocation of land to diplomatic missions in the ACT.

But it also said the NCA should manage impacts on local residents. The horse and Curtin folk must feel rightly managed.

Other recommendations included a tougher stand on diplomatic leases, resuming land not built on within three years; medium and high-density options for housing chanceries; policies to allow the subdivision of existing sites within the diplomatic estate; and a policy framework that allows more extensive use of residential and commercial properties to house chanceries, along the lines adopted in Washington DC.

The Yarralumla residents said at the time that greenfield land in Molonglo could be used but that’s way too peripheral.

The NCA appears to have focused on obtaining a single, large piece of land in a prestigious, convenient area that can be developed long-term into a manageable and secure enclave.

Ms Barnes has thrown a bone to the mob, saying the design could include ways to retain the site’s best natural aspects and provide some sort of access for the community.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr, colourful as ever and with a longer memory than most, called the whole situation Groundhog Day, with the same arguments as 2012 being rolled out, although too late to make a difference.

North Curtin Horse Paddocks

The North Curtin Horse Paddocks and the portion declared National Land in pink.

Knowing the extent of Commonwealth power, the ACT needed to salvage what it could, especially the eastern strip of the horse paddock, already identified for infill development along the Light Rail Stage 2 corridor, something that will require Commonwealth approval.

Not to mention its plans for West Basin, over which the ACT was being held to ransom, according to Mr Barr. Also included was a two-year transition period for agistees.

The Chief Minister was quick to say there was no deal, no agreement. The NCA did what it was always going to do.

He is right to point out the limited room in which the ACT could manoeuvre considering the Commonwealth’s clear power but Mr Barr is also being disingenuous if he expects the community to absolve him of any blame.

What the saga shows is that the NCA plays a long game.

It also reveals that as the ACT grows into a city-state in its own right, memories and knowledge dims about its reason for being and, as Ms Barnes would have us remember, its imperative to serve the national interest.

For her, that clearly meant pursuing land to house foreign missions as part of Australia’s obligations to the international community.

In a bigger, busy Canberra where its citizens are more detached from its history and have less and less time to devote to keeping tabs on their patch, this is a painful wake-up call about what can happen.

In time, there will be 30 hectares less green space. That puts an even higher premium on what’s left.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
23 Responses to Yarralumla kick ensured NCA kept Curtin community in the dark
vyt_vilkaitis vyt_vilkaitis 3:13 pm 21 May 20

Surely the plan for light rail needs to consider the adjoining population density?
We dont need to replace buses for that part of the journey.
We do need light rail to the airport though……

russianafroman russianafroman 5:48 pm 19 May 20

I’d rather a diplomatic estate than a pile of high-rise monstrosities. At the very least, we rest assured knowing that it’s a lot harder for greedy developers and politicians to rezone a low-rise built-up area, than it is a flat piece of land.

HiddenDragon HiddenDragon 8:39 pm 18 May 20

“It also reveals that as the ACT grows into a city-state in its own right, memories and knowledge dims about its reason for being….”

It’s also about the fiscal reality that the ACT Government is heavily reliant on property-related revenues to fund the responsibilities given to it with self-government, plus those added in the following years, under various “cost sharing” deals with the Commonwealth government. Similar pressures are faced by other jurisdictions, but it’s more pronounced here because the revenue base is so narrow.

As time rolls on, the ACT government is looking more like some of the settlement and development outfits which ran in colonial-era Australia – they sometimes had other functions, including what we would now regard as “welfare”, but were primarily about revenue and population growth, with all else subordinate to that.

    Capital Retro Capital Retro 10:00 am 19 May 20

    Pity we don’t have any mineral extraction industries in the ACT – the royalty revenue would help relieve the burden on the ratepayers. It would also create jobs in the private sector.

    I think the only viable export industry the ACT has is the recycling industry. The closest thing we will ever have to extraction is the latent plan to set up a giant furnace to produce electricity and the garbage at the MLRMC would be mined to feed it.

Acton Acton 4:28 pm 18 May 20

There are two models of consultation in the ACT.
The ACT Government consults with the community and then ignores them.
The NCA won’t consult with the community because the community will have different ideas.
This is democracy ACT style.

    chewy14 chewy14 10:51 pm 18 May 20

    Why do you think that developing this area (and West Basin) isn’t exactly what the community wants?

    You need to separate the “community” from a few noisy whingers.

    Acton Acton 2:48 pm 19 May 20

    Why do you think that developing this area is what the community wants?
    ‘Noisy whingers’ are detested by property developers and real estate agents because they stick up for the community.
    ‘Noisy whingers’ have always been in the forefront of battles to preserve our heritage.
    Do you really want more infill of bland boxy apartments lining our roads?
    Try seeing the beauty that surrounds us. Try developing an appreciation for trees, birds, walking trails and natural vistas. It does our souls good.

    chewy14 chewy14 6:27 pm 19 May 20

    Acton,
    Because they’ve been discussed as development areas for more than a decade by this government.

    Who has won every election in that time?

    They clearly have enjoyed wide and long lasting support from the community to implement their development strategies whether you or I personally agree with them.

    “Do you really want more infill of bland boxy apartments lining our roads?”

    I don’t want bland anything, but yes, I would much prefer high density infill on major transport corridors than the alternative of urban sprawl which destroys far more of that natural beauty you talk about.

    If you truly wanted to enjoy the natural beauty more, you would support these types of developments.

    And if you’re truly honest with yourself, you’d look at this area and see that it isn’t actually part of the natural beauty that should be protected, it’s an under utilised piece of central land that is currently set aside for use by mostly privileged and well off horse owners.

    Well sorry, horse agistment areas should be located on the fringes of the city.

    You know, the same places where you expect all the poor and young people to go live, so you can prevent them from enjoying the same type of amenity that you enjoy.

    russianafroman russianafroman 5:46 pm 19 May 20

    Well articulated and persuasive argument.

Martin Budden Martin Budden 3:05 pm 18 May 20

Have a look at the paddocks on Google Maps Satellite View and count the horses. There are 11 horses down in the south-east corner and none at all across all the rest of the area.

    Vicki Carn Vicki Carn 7:09 pm 18 May 20

    Martin Budden probably because the horses are rotated through the paddocks in order for the paddocks to regenerate...... horses do not stay in the one paddock all year, the usual rotation is between 3 or 4 paddocks

    Tim Cole Tim Cole 7:27 pm 18 May 20

    Martin Budden they were hiding under the trees during the satellite pass. #RespectTheirPrivacy

    Martin Budden Martin Budden 9:25 pm 18 May 20

    Vicki Carn thank you, that explains why only one of the four paddocks had horses in it.

    Total number of horses using four paddocks: only 11

    Anna Bruce Anna Bruce 12:37 am 19 May 20

    Yes, because one satellite pass on Google maps represents the total usage and horse count for every day of the year 🙄.

    Saz Hearn Saz Hearn 6:55 am 19 May 20

    Martin Budden it's called responsible land management.

    Vicki Carn Vicki Carn 7:39 am 19 May 20

    Martin Budden during drought the paddocks are managed so as not to permanently damage them - so numbers of horse are often dropped - and no new horses are accepted - plus horses need a certain amount of acreage per head for welfare reasons - so it’s a balancing act

    Martin Budden Martin Budden 8:45 am 19 May 20

    Anna, Saz, Vicki, yes you are all correct and yes I understand all that. It's still a huge amount of valuable city-center land for very few horses. Canberra exists for a reason and that reason is to be the nation's capital, it is not meant to be a farm.

    Vicki Carn Vicki Carn 8:50 am 19 May 20

    Martin Budden but Canberra is the ‘Bush capital’ ..... hard to see us being that with all green inner areas being consumed for housing or other developments - do we really want our city to be just like Sydney and Melbourne? I sure don’t 😀

    Saz Hearn Saz Hearn 8:51 am 19 May 20

    Martin Budden it was a farm. And part of Canberra's charm is that its the bush capital - or it was. The amount of thoughtless development is obscene and has changed the city beyond recognition and not for the better. The underhand lack of public consultation by the NCA because they knew exactly what the public would say is deplorable.

    Oh and where are the horse owners supposed to put their horses?? Other government paddocks are ages away and don't let more horses in... because of land management and prevention of overgrazing.... The embassies could stay in Yarralumla.

    Tracie Campbell Tracie Campbell 10:10 am 19 May 20

    Martin Budden - so are people meant to sell off their horses, who are like members of our family, so others can build more useless infrastructure???

    Catherine Ford Catherine Ford 4:40 pm 19 May 20

    Saz Hearn go get 'em girl!

Penelope Davie Penelope Davie 8:05 am 18 May 20

But the public are allowed to have opinions about developement.

    Shane Jasprizza Shane Jasprizza 9:02 am 18 May 20

    If they want your opinion, they will give it to you.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site